Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / ZLR Cameras / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FZ50 noise

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Wladyslaw Wojciechowski - 12 Nov 2006 09:35 GMT
Hi.
Someone wrote that if there are noise problems
over ISO 100 one should reduce the camera's resolution
to for instance 6 mpix and the problem is over.

Is it true? If yes could somebody elaborate on this?

Thanks in advance!
Wlady
Wayne J. Cosshall - 12 Nov 2006 20:14 GMT
> Hi.
> Someone wrote that if there are noise problems
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks in advance!
> Wlady

Cześć,

It doesn't make sense to me. All that you are doing in reducing the
resolution, which since image noise is single pixel stuff, blurs the
noise and makes it less noticeable.

My noise testing of the FZ50 is here:
<http://www.dimagemaker.com/specials/cameras/camtests.php>

To me a better option, since presumably you bought an FZ50 to get the
resolution it is capable of, is to use a noise reduction filter, like
Noise Ninja, etc.

Cheers,

Wayne

Signature

Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/

Wladyslaw Wojciechowski - 12 Nov 2006 21:38 GMT
>> Hi.
>> Someone wrote that if there are noise problems
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Wayne

Hi, Wayne.
I saw your tests as well as quite a number of pictures made by other
photographers and they don't seem so bad although people make so much
noise about the noise.  ;)
And no, I haven't bought the camera yet. I only consider exchanging
C-765UZ for FZ50, but I don't know... That's why I ask more experienced
persons for their opinions.
Thanks for suggestions.
Wlady
Paul Allen - 13 Nov 2006 15:45 GMT
> I saw your tests as well as quite a number of pictures made by other
> photographers and they don't seem so bad although people make so much
> noise about the noise.  ;)

If the test images don't look so bad to you, you'll probably be happy
with the FZ50.  People make a lot of noise about it because there really
is quite a bit of visible noise when you blow high-ISO images up to 100%
on a computer screen.  Fortunately, that's not how images are normally
used.

> And no, I haven't bought the camera yet. I only consider exchanging
> C-765UZ for FZ50, but I don't know... That's why I ask more
> experienced persons for their opinions.

I upgraded my C-700UZ to an FZ30 just before the FZ50 came out and
generally love it.  It does no better in low light than the C-700
did, but it handles much better.

Paul Allen
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.