I realize this question seems a bit naive. I am not an electrical engineer,
but I understand that in the case of DRAM, you have to keep the entire
assemblage of memory chips refreshed. The SD card is presumably flash
memory, but I was unwilling to assume without knowledge that it was not
somehow necessary to light up the whole chip. If, for example, you had
erased a block of shots, and the camera was examining the file system on the
card for memory to be reused, etc. The drain might be trivial, but who
knows?
Another question might be QA. I have read somewhere that the early batches
of 2GB cards were flakey.
--Nemo
>>Does a larger memory card run the battery down faster?
>
> Only if the gears aren't aligned properly, that throws off the drive chain
> and
> the binding causes excessive power draw.
Paul Allen - 07 Dec 2005 16:01 GMT
> I realize this question seems a bit naive. I am not an electrical engineer,
> but I understand that in the case of DRAM, you have to keep the entire
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> card for memory to be reused, etc. The drain might be trivial, but who
> knows?
Yes, it is flash memory. It takes no power to maintain the stored bits.
The standby power needed to keep the embedded controller alive is
probably trivial. A quick Google query turned up data on the power
consumed by various operations, but nothing on standby power consumption
or whether it increases with the size of the array. The card's
controller takes care of managing free blocks, since it needs to
spread the wear over all the blocks in the array. The camera does not
ever examine the filesystem for blocks to be reused
I'm not an EE either, but the data available with small effort suggests
that any relationship between card capacity and power consumption is so
trivial as to be not worth worrying about. Certainly, the camera's
processor consumes much more power in monitoring its universe than
is used by an idle memory card.
Paul Allen
Nemo Oudeheis - 07 Dec 2005 19:08 GMT
Thanks for the info. "The only stupid question is the one you don't ask."
Of course, there is such a thing as a stupid person....
>> I realize this question seems a bit naive. I am not an electrical
>> engineer, but I understand that in the case of DRAM, you have to keep the
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Paul Allen
>>Does a larger memory card run the battery down faster?
>
> Only if the gears aren't aligned properly, that throws off the drive chain
> and
> the binding causes excessive power draw.
Therefore you have to lubricate the drive chain.
Jay - 24 Feb 2006 17:27 GMT
Panasonic FZ30 documentation says max SD size is 2GB. Also recommends SD
with speeds above 10MB/s which is sometimes called 66 X times speed or more
for video mode.
Jay.
measekite - 25 Feb 2006 00:14 GMT
Is that because the largest Panasonic made at the time was that size?
>Panasonic FZ30 documentation says max SD size is 2GB. Also recommends SD
>with speeds above 10MB/s which is sometimes called 66 X times speed or more
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>
Jay - 25 Feb 2006 02:28 GMT
Maybe it is because of FZ30 algorithm for creating folders and
naming/numbering the photos it writes to the SD card.
Jay.
> Is that because the largest Panasonic made at the time was that size?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>Jay.