Just make sure it's insured first.
Look at the Olympus E-1 pictures halfway down the thread. I've seen
this done myself.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1000&message=25384927
> Just make sure it's insured first.
>
> Look at the Olympus E-1 pictures halfway down the thread. I've seen
> this done myself.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1000&message=25384927
Seen what done?
Buy_Sell - 28 Oct 2007 02:21 GMT
> > Just make sure it's insured first.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Seen what done?
I believe that he is referring to the pictures of the guy washing his
camera in the sink to clean it. This seems a little bit
unconventional. I'm not sure if I would do it.
> Just make sure it's insured first.
>
> Look at the Olympus E-1 pictures halfway down the thread. I've seen
> this done myself.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1000&message=25384927
Only a moron would try this with a Canon since even the 1D series are only
weather resistant:
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&tabact=ModelFeatur
esTabAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=14999&pageno=3.
The Oly E1 is spec'd to be splashproof:
http://www.olympusamerica.com/e1/feat_durability_components.asp.
You do know the difference, right? Don't let the facts get in the way.
RichA - 28 Oct 2007 06:03 GMT
> > Just make sure it's insured first.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> You do know the difference, right? Don't let the facts get in the way.
Yes. Difference is Canon cheaped out on $5000 and $8000 cameras.
Mark B. - 28 Oct 2007 13:23 GMT
>> > Just make sure it's insured first.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Yes. Difference is Canon cheaped out on $5000 and $8000 cameras.
So those that want a splashproof camera can look somewhere else, pretty
simple really. Nowhere does Canon advertise splash- or weatherprof cameras.
Mark
>Just make sure it's insured first.
>
>Look at the Olympus E-1 pictures halfway down the thread. I've seen
>this done myself.
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1000&message=25384927
I wouldn't try it with an E-1 unless it were wrapped inside a
waterproof housing. I don't care how well it's weatherproofed, there
is no way I would shoot a naked camera under those conditions.
If I felt the urge to shoot in a sandstorm I'd drag out a disposable
or my cell phone. I suspect the quality of the images would have been
about the same as those taken by an E-1.
TR
>Just make sure it's insured first.
>
>Look at the Olympus E-1 pictures halfway down the thread. I've seen
>this done myself.
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1000&message=25384927
Rich, a simple question please..... and it deserves a simple
answer.....
What is your axe to grind with Canon? Where did it come from?
Put aside the spin and the elaborate BS about engineering and customer
concern..... What's your REAL beef? Did Canon fire you at some point
in the past? Did they fire your father? What is it that makes you hate
Canon so badly.
And if you come back with some elaborate BS about your innate goodness
and their overwhelming evilness you are getting the PLONK!!!
Aad - 28 Oct 2007 15:29 GMT
>>Just make sure it's insured first.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> And if you come back with some elaborate BS about your innate goodness
> and their overwhelming evilness you are getting the PLONK!!!
Ever heard of Don Quichote de la Mancha?
Aad
Skinner1@hotmail.com - 29 Oct 2007 12:09 GMT
>>>Just make sure it's insured first.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Ever heard of Don Quichote de la Mancha?
>Aad
Interesting annology. However, I might point out that Don Quichote de
la Mancha had honor and character.
Aad - 29 Oct 2007 15:40 GMT
>>>>Just make sure it's insured first.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Interesting annology. However, I might point out that Don Quichote de
> la Mancha had honor and character.
Oops, my mistake!
(but he did fight windmills)
TRoss - 29 Oct 2007 16:40 GMT
>>>>>Just make sure it's insured first.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>Oops, my mistake!
>(but he did fight windmills)
I think Rander is more a cross between the Red Queen from _Alice's
Adventures in Wonderland_ and the Black Knight from _Monty Python and
the Holy Grail_.
Like the Red Queen, he demands perfection, and he leaps immediately to
a conclusion (Sentence first, verdict afterwards) without any regard
to subtleties like evidence.
Like the Black Knight, he picks pointless fights that are hard to
ignore, and he keeps fighting the same pointless fight out of sheer
stubbonness. Oh, and he's a loony.
TR
▀Slack - 29 Oct 2007 02:03 GMT
>> Just make sure it's insured first.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> And if you come back with some elaborate BS about your innate goodness
> and their overwhelming evilness you are getting the PLONK!!!
Little Richie was once sodomized with a 400L 5.6. While he has since come
to enjoy
the experience, it still left a bad taste in his mouth.

Signature
Slack
RichA - 29 Oct 2007 13:24 GMT
On Oct 28, 6:44 am, Skinn...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >Just make sure it's insured first.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> What is your axe to grind with Canon? Where did it come from?
Nothing really. I think they are plagued with problems and their
owners are sheep.
Bates - 29 Oct 2007 19:34 GMT
> On Oct 28, 6:44 am, Skinn...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Nothing really. I think they are plagued with problems and their
> owners are sheep.
Baaaaaaaaaa..........
Nothing wrong with my Canon. Now my abilities as a
photographer....well, that could still use some work.
Seriously - I've owned a few Canon's in the past - first 35mm and now
digital. Never had a problem. Think they work great. Bought a Canon
digital 'cause I already had money invested in glass for my old 35 mm
(not a lot of money mind you, but still money non-the-less).
And by the way - never once have I felt the need to wash my camera.
What are you doing - taking it in the bath with you Rich?