Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sony a100 Flash problem. Need suggestions please.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LooksLikeRain - 11 Apr 2007 23:28 GMT
Hello all,

I just purchased the a100 a couple of days ago. My determining factor
was mainly that I already had a couple Minolta lenses and a flash. So
far, I am very pleased with the a100. I rarely take photographs above
ISO 800, so I don't worry about the noise. The picture quality is
phenominal. I have compared shots with the Nikon D80 and A200 as well
as the Canon Rebel XTi, and the Sony shots just look better in my
opinion. Of course, those are well lit shots under ISO 400.

Anyway, my question is this: I have a Konica Minolta Maxxum 3600HS
TTL
Shoe Mount Flash
that I am trying to use with the a100, but it seems to not be
compensating correctly regardless of the lense I use. It will
overflood the subject with light as if were using a full burst. I
have
to bounce the light off of the ceiling (pointing the flash head
vertical) and cover it with wax paper to even get the light to adjust
properly. What am I doing wrong?  Do I just need to get a new flash?
I
was hoping that I wouldn't have to go that far, but it is looking
like
I may have to if I can't get this worked out.
David Kilpatrick - 12 Apr 2007 00:06 GMT
> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> like
> I may have to if I can't get this worked out.

Is it labelled HS (D) or just 3600 HS?

Anything earlier than HS (D) will not work - it just fires on full power
and you must set your aperture manually.

If there is an error with an HS (D) gun, it is possible to have the gun
recalibrated for correct operation, by the Sony/former Minolta repair
service, and it's usually free.

David
Alan Browne - 13 Apr 2007 01:58 GMT
>> Hello all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Anything earlier than HS (D) will not work - it just fires on full power
> and you must set your aperture manually.

I thought the HS series were supposed to work as well with the digital
cameras, no?

> If there is an error with an HS (D) gun, it is possible to have the gun
> recalibrated for correct operation, by the Sony/former Minolta repair
> service, and it's usually free.
>
> David

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

David Kilpatrick - 13 Apr 2007 12:22 GMT
> I thought the HS series were supposed to work as well with the digital
> cameras, no?

No, unfortunately. Unless the gun is an HS (D) - which I actually think
all 3600 units are but I'm not quite sure - I have one web reference
only to a 3600 HS which looks like a 3500 xi - different style of gun.
The 5400 HS definitely does not work with the digital bodies, and the
5600 HS(D) is needed. But - what was the '3' series gun which went with
the 5400HS? I have a feeling it may have been a 3600HS with no 'D'. If
so, that gun would not work with digital bodies.

I do have just about every Minolta press release CD from the last ten
years but the 3500xi appears to be identically dated to the 5400HS, and
if there was a 3600HS with no D, it is later than July 1999.

David
Alan Browne - 14 Apr 2007 19:49 GMT
>> I thought the HS series were supposed to work as well with the digital
>> cameras, no?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the 5400HS? I have a feeling it may have been a 3600HS with no 'D'. If
> so, that gun would not work with digital bodies.

The "D" being the "Distance Integration" compatible flashes... got it.

> I do have just about every Minolta press release CD from the last ten
> years but the 3500xi appears to be identically dated to the 5400HS, and
> if there was a 3600HS with no D, it is later than July 1999.

I bought my 5400HS a few years after the 3500 xi, but I don't recall the
exact date.

Cheers,
Alan

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

POHB - 12 Apr 2007 13:10 GMT
> Anyway, my question is this: I have a Konica Minolta Maxxum 3600HS
> TTL
> Shoe Mount Flash
> that I am trying to use with the a100, but it seems to not be
> compensating correctly regardless of the lense I use.

Assuming the A100 is similar to the KM 5D in this respect, have you
experimented with the different ADI and TTL flash modes?  Also does it
make any difference at all if you change the flash compensation
settings on the camera?  I usually have to adjust the flash down a bit
if not bouncing it.
jonst - 12 Apr 2007 13:43 GMT
Hi,

I had a similar problem with the Flash in my Camera but I found a solution in
a tech support site which I found to be very helpfull. Here is the page for
Sony Tech Support:
http://www.fixya.com/support/sony/digital_cameras

Hope it helps

Jon
LooksLikeRain - 12 Apr 2007 15:31 GMT
> > Anyway, my question is this: I have a Konica Minolta Maxxum 3600HS
> > TTL
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> settings on the camera?  I usually have to adjust the flash down a bit
> if not bouncing it.

The flash is not an HS (D) model. It is just HS 3600. From a couple of
other postings I have read that the new Sony HVL-F36AM is just a
rebadged HS 3600. I don't know if that's true or not, but they do look
very similar on the outside. I'm by no means an expert though. There's
apparently something different though, since the HS 3600 will not work
"out-of-the-box" with the a100.

I did try stepping down the flash as far as it would go. I think -2
was the setting. I didn't change the aperture at all. Just left it in
full auto mode to test the flash. No change. I have to currently
bounce the flash (covered with wax paper) to have it work to any
degree indoors. If the subject is within 4-6 feet, I can forget it. :-
(  I guess I could try closing the aperture a bit as well.

I haven't yet experiemented with the ADI and TTL flash modes. I guess
the default is ADI? I will give that a try this weekend, and let you
know how that works. Thank you for the suggestion. ::crossing fingers::
Fred McKenzie - 14 Apr 2007 19:31 GMT
> The flash is not an HS (D) model. It is just HS 3600. From a couple of
> other postings I have read that the new Sony HVL-F36AM is just a
> rebadged HS 3600. I don't know if that's true or not, but they do look
> very similar on the outside. I'm by no means an expert though. There's
> apparently something different though, since the HS 3600 will not work
> "out-of-the-box" with the a100.

Rain-

I blindly assumed my old Minolta 5400xi flash would work, and was
surprised to have the same results as you describe.  It seems that
Minolta changed from an analog TTL exposure system to a digital one,
even before they brought out a digital body.

After the bad experience, I purchased a Minolta 5600HS-D which works
perfectly.  It is identical in appearance and specs to the Sony
HVL-F56AM.  As far as I can tell, the HVL-F36AM is the same except that
maximum light output has a GN of 36 instead of 56 Meters for ISO 100.

Your 3600HS would have the letter "D" appended to its number on the
flash, if it was compatible with the digital TTL system.

Fred
LooksLikeRain - 30 Apr 2007 15:07 GMT
> In article <1176388272.820295.199...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Fred

Thank you for your reply. I finally got around to testing all of the
suggestions mentioned in this post. I changed the menu settings on the
camera to not use the distance flash metering and instead to use the
TTL preflash. That didn't have any effect. I also tried locking the
ISO to 100, and that didn't have any effect as well. It seems my model
of the 3600 flash (which is not the "D" model) does not function with
the Sony A-100. I also tried an older 3600xi flash I had (I was using
it as a wireless slave), and it does not function as well (makes sense
if the 3600HS didn't work I guess). I guess I am off to look for the
new Sony Flash that is comparable.

Just a quick sidenote (maybe I should start a new post, please don't
bash me for this), does anyone have any good recommendations for a
good flash (under $300) for the Sony A-100.  Thanks for all of your
help and responses by the way. Even though I wasn't able to get my old
flash working. I appreciated the extra help that was offered.
LooksLikeRain - 02 May 2007 16:52 GMT
> > In article <1176388272.820295.199...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Correction: I stated that I tried a 3600xi. It was actually a 3500xi.
Sorry about that.
Alan Browne - 13 Apr 2007 01:57 GMT
> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> to bounce the light off of the ceiling (pointing the flash head
> vertical)

Best way to shoot flash in any case.

and cover it with wax paper to even get the light to adjust

Wax paper?  Hmm... the TTL would just increase in any case to
compensate.  Do you have flash comp on high?  Flash on manuan and high
power?
Jim - 03 May 2007 19:54 GMT
> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> as the Canon Rebel XTi, and the Sony shots just look better in my
> opinion. Of course, those are well lit shots under ISO 400.

As a note to all.

Flash incompatibility can  be extended to most ofther companies as
well.  The TTL flash system measured light in several ways in a film
camera, and one of those being light relected off the film  in
combination with lens focus distance, aperature, ambient light, etc.  
The TTL system in a digital camera is considerably different, as there
is no film to reflect off, so the light is measured in other ways.  The
computer that is calculating  the lfash exposure receieves different
inputs and has a much different algorithm.  Therefore flash systems
designed for film cameras will not likely work well if at all on DSLR
systems.  Note, that in the Nikon world I do use my old SB28 as slave,
as the SB800DX  is doing the actual control and just signalling the
SB28.

Signature

Jim     <jen....not....home..remvdots...@....yahoo

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.