Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Printing

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Valerie Kolbert - 30 Mar 2007 17:40 GMT
Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask what
is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the Canon
Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait for the
Pro9500.  Suggestions?
Bill KB3GUN - 30 Mar 2007 17:44 GMT
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go
> ask what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of
> buying the Canon Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or
> if I should wait for the Pro9500.  Suggestions?

I'm an Epson fan, but that's just me.
Printer usenet group:  comp.periphs.printers
Signature

Smitty
Somerset, PA

Valerie Kolbert - 30 Mar 2007 19:43 GMT
I'm sure comp.periphs.printers is a fine place to discuss printers, but I'm
really seeking the opinions (What?  These people opinionated?  ;> ) of the
local denizens that also use cameras with their printers.  FWIW, I already
own or have owned a number of so-called "Photo" printers over the past ten
years, but now I'm looking for something that is a step up from putting a
3-color photo cartridge into my OfficeJet 7410.  Hopefully something that
will print a 13x19 of sufficient quality that I could deliver it with a
wedding formal squirted onto it.  Yeah, I know, Real Professional
Photographers don't use inkjet printers that you can buy at CompUSA.  But I
also use an XTi (with EF-S lenses no less) to do real weddings.

>> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go
>> ask what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I'm an Epson fan, but that's just me.
> Printer usenet group:  comp.periphs.printers
Ron Recer - 31 Mar 2007 15:09 GMT
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask
> what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the
> Canon Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait
> for the Pro9500.  Suggestions?

I use a HP 8450 (8 inks) and a HP D7160 (6 inks) and believe they both do a
great job when using HP Priemum photo paper.  However, most people probably
think what ever printer(s) they use do good jobs or they wouldn't use them.

Try taking a photo to Comp USA, BestBuy, Circuit City or whatever your
favorite store is, along with photo paper and ask them to let you print a
sample from each printer you are considering.  Then you can choose which
ever printer you think does the best job.

Ron
Craig M - 31 Mar 2007 19:30 GMT
Here is my 2 cents worth, I use a older Photosmart 1000 by HP with great
results with photo paper, also plain paper does pretty well in it for a
quick photo print, ie...low res, also have a Epson stand alone photo printer
that does 4 by 6 prints and it is great for them, for the most part, people
that you hand them to cant tell them from the local Rx or Wal Mart photo
process, been thinking of a better photo printer for the house, since I now
have a better camera, Nikon D50.

> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask what
> is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the Canon
> Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait for the
> Pro9500.  Suggestions?
scsisys - 01 Apr 2007 01:08 GMT
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/03/22/pro_printer_titans_clash_in_vegas/

some new printers that may interest you.

> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask what
> is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the Canon
> Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait for the
> Pro9500.  Suggestions?
babaloo - 01 Apr 2007 23:56 GMT
It all depends . . .
. . .  on how serious you are about wanting to get quality results.
Are you planning to use color management? What imaging program do you use?
Are you going to use a monitor calibration device?
Valerie Kolbert - 04 Apr 2007 17:09 GMT
Of course I'll be using CM - how else do you get the picture that you want
out of a printer?

Using Lightroom for RAW processing and PSCS3 for editing.  Currently using
Huey for monitor calibration, systems are two Sony laptops of Very High
Screen Resolution and an ancient Powerbook G4.

BTW, as for color management, I just finished reading the Eddie Tapp
(Oreilly) book on CM - what a totally lovely production piece (must've used
a lot of color management to produce it) that contains totally no useful
information on how to DO color management.  It's fine to tell me what it is,
and even a bit of how it works.  But I already knew that because I used to
write printer drivers back in the 80s.  The question of what to buy and how
to do it with modern systems and software is entirely ignored by that book.

> It all depends . . .
> . . .  on how serious you are about wanting to get quality results.
> Are you planning to use color management? What imaging program do you use?
> Are you going to use a monitor calibration device?
frederick - 04 Apr 2007 22:33 GMT
> Of course I'll be using CM - how else do you get the picture that you want
> out of a printer?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> Are you planning to use color management? What imaging program do you use?
>> Are you going to use a monitor calibration device?

If colour management is critical:
(and my comments will annoy the *%$( out of Canon owners)
Thermal inkjet printers "drift" over time as the heating resistors age
on cycling millions of times.  HP recognise this by implementing "closed
loop self calibration" on printers like the B9180 and "Z" series, where
recalibration after (routine - but hopefully not too frequent) head
replacement is required, or to compensate for colour drift over time.
Epson don't have such a big problem, as Piezo heads don't age in that
manner (and no, I'm not saying that colour drift isn't possible with
Epson printers)
So what do Canon do?
I expect that the answer for critical users is that it is much more
important  for users to have equipment to make custom profiles, and do
this on a regular basis, than it is for Epson or HP users.
YMMV
tomm42 - 02 Apr 2007 14:14 GMT
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask what
> is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the Canon
> Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait for the
> Pro9500.  Suggestions?

HP B9180, except for obnoxious software, very nice prints.
Cannon iPF5000, Wonderful prints, lousy warranty, also Cannon does't
just replace DOA items, sends repair folks out. Suggested it has the
lowest ink usage aof any inkjet printer.
Those are my 2 current favorites.

Tom
J. Clarke - 02 Apr 2007 14:34 GMT
>> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go
>> ask what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of
>> buying the Canon Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or
>> if I should wait for the Pro9500.  Suggestions?
>
> HP B9180, except for obnoxious software, very nice prints.

I've been thinking about a 9180.  I'm curious--what's the problem with
the software?
Signature

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

tomm42 - 02 Apr 2007 18:13 GMT
> >> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go
> >> ask what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> to email, dial "usenet" and validate
> (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

I use the printer on a hospital own computer, the printer works fine,
but the auto update splash screen comes up every 15 minutes or so. I
have set it to every 30 days, the longest to no avail. I have to go
through IT services to get permission to delete the HP software other
than the driver and plugin, so I'm caught in between.
Again the printer results seem very nice, just my home printer the
Canon iPF5000 is spectacular and very fast.

Tom
J. Clarke - 02 Apr 2007 19:06 GMT
>>> On Mar 30, 12:40 pm, "Valerie Kolbert" <kolbe...@bellsouth.net>
>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> through IT services to get permission to delete the HP software other
> than the driver and plugin, so I'm caught in between.

That blasted autoupdate screen.  No way to turn it off?  Thanks.  I'll
wait for the 9500.  See DECPaqard shoot themselves in the foot yet
again.

> Again the printer results seem very nice, just my home printer the
> Canon iPF5000 is spectacular and very fast.
>
> Tom

Signature

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

tomm42 - 02 Apr 2007 20:08 GMT
> >>> On Mar 30, 12:40 pm, "Valerie Kolbert" <kolbe...@bellsouth.net>
> >>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> to email, dial "usenet" and validate
> (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

I'm just locked into a hospital IT system, didn't become bothersome
until after my "install" period ended (give you 5 days). Now I have to
go back, call IT explain my problem and worry that the person on the
other end of the line got up on the wrong side of the bed this
morning. If only the splash screen would do as I asked it, only come
up every 30 days.
Oh well. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend this printer.

Tom
Lug.Nut.Loose - 06 Apr 2007 02:31 GMT
>Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask what
>is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the Canon
>Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait for the
>Pro9500.  Suggestions?

I use an HP Photosmart 8750. 9 ink, 13"x19" capability with usb and
ethernet ports, card readers. Prints in B+W are great and so are color
prints. Pricey though - $500.00 US

Roy
nick c - 07 Apr 2007 23:47 GMT
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask what
> is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the Canon
> Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait for the
> Pro9500.  Suggestions?

I'm an Epson fan. Almost all my preferred color as well as black &
white photo printing is done on an Epson R1800 printer. I'm super
satisfied with what this printer can do when properly adjusted.
=(8) - 08 Apr 2007 03:04 GMT
>> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask
>> what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying
>> the Canon Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should
>> wait for the Pro9500.  Suggestions?
Epson is probably tops right now, but they are waste the most ink. They also
like to play name games with there papers which makes it hard to find what
you want from one paper purchase to another. Canon is ok, but they are not
known for prints with long lives, though they are working on it. They still
don't match Epson or HP. I have the Epson R2400, the HP PhotoSmart B9180 and
the Epson PictureMate Snap. If you just need 4x6 the snap is the way to go.
It is an awesome printer with very fast printing speeds great color and the
prints last. It is also the most affordable paper and ink wise because you
buy them in a package which puts prints at around $0.27 each. If you need
more than 4x6 I would go with the HP. It has larger ink cartridges, it
wastes a lot less ink and the prints in my opinion have much more detail.
The Epson R2400 wastes ink like they are giving the stuff away, Epson did a
horrible job naming all of the paper paths so you are never quick sure which
one the driver is referring too and I don't feel the prints are as good as
the HP. Now the HP will cost you more to replace all of the ink cartridges
but they are much larger with much more ink I get 4 to 1 in the number of
prints per cartridge when I compare the Epson R2400 to the HP, that is for
everyone one print the Epson does I can get 4 from the HP. Also, the HP is a
much better made printer and it has a real paper tray and not a slot in the
back with no cover so dust can get down in it. Also, the Epson tends to clog
up if you don't use it at least once a week the HP todate hasn't clogged
once.

=(8)
Steve Dell - 08 Apr 2007 23:54 GMT
Check out either the Epson 1400 or R1800.

I have the latter and am very pleased with it.

> Well, there doesn't seem to be a rec.photo.printing where I can go ask
> what is everyone's favorite inkjet for photos.  I'm thinking of buying the
> Canon Pixma Pro9000 but wondering if the HP is better or if I should wait
> for the Pro9500.  Suggestions?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.