Hi,
I have finally decided to plunge for a 350D. What is the best CF card to
buy for this camera? I am kinda deciding betweeen the following:
1. Sandisk Ultra II 1GB
2. Sandisk Extreme III 1GB
3. Lexar 80X 1Gb
Is it worth going for the fast but expensive card? I have heard that the
350D doesn't utilize the full writing speed of the Lexar, what about
the Sandisk Extreme III?
Thanks
CJ
G.T. - 17 Mar 2005 18:13 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 2. Sandisk Extreme III 1GB
> 3. Lexar 80X 1Gb
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-6133
I went with #1 above. It was quick to find and relatively cheap.
Greg
Randall Ainsworth - 17 Mar 2005 23:54 GMT
> 1. Sandisk Ultra II 1GB
> 2. Sandisk Extreme III 1GB
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 350D doesn't utilize the full writing speed of the Lexar, what about
> the Sandisk Extreme III?
I'd vote Lexar. I use them exclusively and they are the best. You can
get a slower and smaller one, you know.
David H. Lipman - 18 Mar 2005 00:18 GMT
From: "Randall Ainsworth" <rag@nospam.techline.com>
| I'd vote Lexar. I use them exclusively and they are the best. You can
| get a slower and smaller one, you know.
SanDisk is the OEM of all memory cards for Canon.
Therefore, Canon is of the opinion that SanDisk is the best. ;-)

Signature
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
Paige Miller - 18 Mar 2005 21:32 GMT
> From: "Randall Ainsworth" <rag@nospam.techline.com>
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> SanDisk is the OEM of all memory cards for Canon.
> Therefore, Canon is of the opinion that SanDisk is the best. ;-)
There are a number of ways that a memory card can be considered
"best". Did Canon decide it was "best" based upon quality, or "best"
based upon some volume pricing discount, or "best" because of
something else?

Signature
Paige Miller
pmiller5@rochester.rr.com
http://paiges-page.net
It's nothing until I call it -- Bill Klem, NL Umpire
If you get the choice to sit it out or dance,
I hope you dance -- Lee Ann Womack
David H. Lipman - 18 Mar 2005 22:33 GMT
From: "Paige Miller" <pmiller5NOSPAM@rochester.rr.com>
| There are a number of ways that a memory card can be considered
| "best". Did Canon decide it was "best" based upon quality, or "best"
| based upon some volume pricing discount, or "best" because of
| something else?
That's true.
But it doesn't change the fact that SanDisk is the preferred OEM memory vendor for Canon.

Signature
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
G.T. - 18 Mar 2005 00:26 GMT
I switched from Lexar to Sandisk after reading the benchmarks and I'm
glad I switched.
Vern - 22 Mar 2005 06:08 GMT
I started with Lexar and have had 3 card failures over the last 5 years with
them. Replaced them with Sandisk and had no more problems.
>> 1. Sandisk Ultra II 1GB
>> 2. Sandisk Extreme III 1GB
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'd vote Lexar. I use them exclusively and they are the best. You can
> get a slower and smaller one, you know.
Jim Redelfs - 18 Mar 2005 00:01 GMT
> I have finally decided to plunge for a 350D. What is the best CF card to
> buy for this camera? I am kinda deciding betweeen the following:
>
> 1. Sandisk Ultra II 1GB
> 2. Sandisk Extreme III 1GB
> 3. Lexar 80X 1Gb
I purchased the SanDisk Ultra II 1GB for my 20D.
Considering your intended camera has the same, new(er) image processor, I
expect you would benefit from the same CF card.
When it comes to read/write performance, 9MB/sec write and 10MB/sec read is
something I can understand. I have yet to read a explanation/translation of
40x, 60x, 80x, etc. It's meaningless to me.
:)
JR
David H. Lipman - 18 Mar 2005 00:26 GMT
From: "Jim Redelfs" <jim.redelfs@redelfs.com>
| I purchased the SanDisk Ultra II 1GB for my 20D.
|
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| :)
| JR
1x = .15MB/s
2x = .3MB/s
40x = 6MB/s
60x = 9MB/s <----- SanDisk Ultra II
80x = 12MB/s <----- Lexar
133x = 20MB/s <----- SanDisk Extreme III
HTH
BTW: I like your X-Face, did you make it ?

Signature
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
Jim Redelfs - 18 Mar 2005 02:55 GMT
> > I have yet to read a explanation/translation of
> > 40x, 60x, 80x, etc. It's meaningless to me.
> 1x = .15MB/s
> 2x = .3MB/s
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> HTH
Thanks! I hoped that would inspire someone to educate me! :)
> BTW: I like your X-Face, did you make it ?
Yes, with a little help from Photoshop Elements 2.0 and Saving Face, the
latter under Mac OS 9.x.
:)
JR