 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / February 2007lens reversal ring
Sent about four times, macro picture link, but won't post on this ng.?????????? > Sent about four times, macro picture link, but won't post on this > ng.?????????? After reading on this ng about the lens reversal ring, I bought one and tried it out. Test shot of ballpoint pen. Dave http://www.geocities.com/tonguesten@sbcglobal.net/ballpen_web.jpg >> Sent about four times, macro picture link, but won't post on this >> ng.?????????? You got it twice now. > After reading on this ng about the lens reversal ring, I bought one and > tried it out. Test shot of ballpoint pen. Dave > http://www.geocities.com/tonguesten@sbcglobal.net/ballpen_web.jpg Looks good, what lens? >>> Sent about four times, macro picture link, but won't post on this >>> ng.?????????? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Looks good, what lens? Nikon D70, Nikon 105 macro, with Nikon 50mm 1.8 reversed. For some reason the lost postings are finding there way 'in', notice the two o'clock posting following the seven O'clock postings?????? On Feb 24, 8:38 pm, Wolfgang Schmittenhammer <tonguesten@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>> Sent about four times, macro picture link, but won't post on this > >>> ng.?????????? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > For some reason the lost postings are finding there way 'in', > notice the two o'clock posting following the seven O'clock postings?????? Rather than these multilens contrivances (every element hurts contrast, sharpness) why not microlenses that don't need bellows? >On Feb 24, 8:38 pm, Wolfgang Schmittenhammer ><tonguesten@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >Rather than these multilens contrivances (every element hurts >contrast, sharpness) why not microlenses that don't need bellows? So in your opinion a simple single-element lens loses contrast and sharpness when you add more elements? PS: Microlenses??? Are you serious?  SignatureJohn Bean |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.