 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / February 2007Canon lenses are more versatile and better than Nikkors!
It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under the pressure. Had I known how good L glass is I would have never bought Nikkors. http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/glass.htm Rita > It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding > situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Rita Thanks for the chuckle! Paul B. WOW. Now I can look for old Canon lens to replace the broken leg on my chair. www.alldigital.fotopic.net > It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding > situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under > the pressure. Had I known how good L glass is I would have never bought > Nikkors. > > http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/glass.htm The white clashes. On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: > http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/glass.htm I sent the image link to a few friends of mine and got some amusing replies: "So, that's about, what? $40,000, plus the glass and the wine?" "It's obvious why they don't have nicer couches." "My first thought was "What the L"!" -alan  SignatureAlan Hoyle - alanh@unc.edu - http://www.alanhoyle.com/ "I don't want the world, I just want your half." -TMBG Get Horizontal, Play Ultimate. > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > "It's obvious why they don't have nicer couches." > "My first thought was "What the L"!" Hah! Yes, an L of a deal. This is amusing, the photo, but "Rita" has become tiresome in *his* pounding his pud over Canon products. Signaturejohn mcwilliams >> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Hah! Yes, an L of a deal. This is amusing, the photo, but "Rita" has > become tiresome in *his* pounding his pud over Canon products. As opposed to *your* continued pud-pounding over Rita's gender, John? ;-) Neil >>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > As opposed to *your* continued pud-pounding over Rita's gender, John? ;-) /Snort/ I don't like fakes. Signaturejohn mcwilliams >>>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > /Snort/ I don't like fakes. I'm curious about this: How do you know, or what makes you believe, Rita is not really a woman? Neil >>>>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I'm curious about this: How do you know, or what makes you believe, Rita is > not really a woman? I'm not going there, and I wouldn't encourage anyone else to either. And I'll not respond to any challenge that I can't prove it. No disrespect to you. SignatureJohn McWilliams >>>>>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I'll not respond to any challenge that I can't prove it. No disrespect to > you. None taken, but it all sounds very mysterious. Neil >>>>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I'm curious about this: How do you know, or what makes you believe, Rita is > not really a woman? There have been many clues. Greg Signature"All my time I spent in heaven Revelries of dance and wine Waking to the sound of laughter Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons >>>>>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:06:52 -0500, Rita ?? Berkowitz wrote: >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > There have been many clues. Such as . . . ? I'm in and out of newsgroups, often out for long periods of time. I've seen the claims made before that Rita is not a woman, and she ( ? ) has alluded to them too. But I haven't seen any of the reasons for the claims. There must be reasons for people to believe this, I know. I'm just curious as to what they are. Neil > I've seen > the claims made before that Rita is not a woman, and she ( ? ) has alluded > to them too. Is there really any reason to care? If Rita is a guy is cross-dressing -- so what. Some trannies are better women than I am. >> I've seen >> the claims made before that Rita is not a woman, and she ( ? ) has >> alluded >> to them too. > > Is there really any reason to care? Only curiosity. I don't recall having seen before an issue being made of a regular's gender like this. > I'm in and out of newsgroups, often out for long periods of time. > I've seen the claims made before that Rita is not a woman, and she ( > ? ) has alluded to them too. But I haven't seen any of the reasons > for the claims. There must be reasons for people to believe this, I > know. I'm just curious as to what they are. Don't put much effort into worrying about it, Neil. I'm not going to tell since it's more fun keeping the idiots guessing? Plus, some people have such an empty life that these little things have great significance to them. It doesn't matter to me since I know how to relieve myself, and that's all that matters to me. Rita >> I'm in and out of newsgroups, often out for long periods of time. >> I've seen the claims made before that Rita is not a woman, and she ( [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Don't put much effort into worrying about it, Neil. I worry effortlessly, Rita. :-) But this isn't worrying me at all, just has me curious. > I'm not going to tell > since it's more fun keeping the idiots guessing? And John won't tell what his reasons are for thinking you're not a woman. So I remain curious. > Plus, some people have > such an empty life that these little things have great significance to > them. > It doesn't matter to me since I know how to relieve myself, and that's all > that matters to me. And you know the answer, of course. Neil > It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding > situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under > the pressure. Had I known how good L glass is I would have never bought > Nikkors. > > http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/glass.htm <guffaw!> Note also that the bottle of wine is probably Canonnay (similar to chardonnay, but blander), though it's very hard to read the label on account of the shot not having been taken with a Nikkor. Best served with Canonbert cheese on those little crackers. Neil >> It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding >> situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > chardonnay, but blander), though it's very hard to read the label on > account of the shot not having been taken with a Nikkor. That's the softness of the infamous 16-35/2.8. Hey, it's a great lens since some people swear by it. > Best served with Canonbert cheese on those little crackers. Cheese Whiz. Rita > It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding > situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under > the pressure. Had I known how good L glass is I would have never bought > Nikkors. > > http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/glass.htm Wonderful! My D70 gave up the ghost, finally, the other day at Disney World. Probably a few too many typhoons, tropical heat, getting dropped, and general abuse. If it costs too much to fix it, now I know something I can do with it. SignatureWaddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor >>It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding >>situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Probably a few too many typhoons, tropical heat, getting dropped, and general > abuse. If it costs too much to fix it, now I know something I can do with it. I dismantled mine just for fun: <http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=Misc/photography/cameras/2006-12-02-d70 -dismantle> >> It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding >> situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > dropped, and general abuse. If it costs too much to fix it, now I > know something I can do with it. Damn! I'm sorry to hear about the D70. I hope it's an easy and cheap repair. Rita > It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding > situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under > the pressure. Had I known how good L glass is I would have never bought > Nikkors. > > http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/glass.htm Seems like I have to buy 3x 30D and 3x 500mm F4 IS L... SignatureJørn Dahl-Stamnes http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/ You know that you really should be using some of those Canon Circular Polarizers...they make great coasters in your application! > It's true! Only Canon lenses can be this versatile in such demanding > situations. I realize now that the Nikkors simply couldn't hold up under [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Rita |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.