Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / February 2007
Close Up Photos
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Paul Renfree - 07 Feb 2007 05:34 GMT I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves etc. Can I use a non-macro telephoto lens such as a Nikon 70-300 to do this, or does the telephoto lens need to have a macro setting?
What about using a close up lens that screws on to a regular lens ?
Thanks for any advice
Paul Renfree
Marc Sabatella - 07 Feb 2007 05:51 GMT >I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves >etc. Can > I use a non-macro telephoto lens such as a Nikon 70-300 to do this, > or does > the telephoto lens need to have a macro setting? A non-macro lens won't get *as* close, but might be close enough for your purposes - you'll have to try it and see.
> What about using a close up lens that screws on to a regular lens ? Definitely gets you closer. If you use a lens hood, stop *way* down, and use a tripod since the resulting shutter speeed will be slow, you can get decent results.
--------------- Marc Sabatella marc@outsideshore.com
Music, art, & educational materials Featuring "A Jazz Improvisation Primer" http://www.outsideshore.com/
Wayne J. Cosshall - 07 Feb 2007 06:03 GMT >> I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves >> etc. Can [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > and use a tripod since the resulting shutter speeed will be slow, you > can get decent results. Also provided you get quality ones from a known manufacturers rather than some of the no-name closeup filters that float around.
Another option is an extension tube or two.
Cheers,
Wayne
 Signature Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Paul Furman - 07 Feb 2007 06:17 GMT >>> I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves >>> etc. Can [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Another option is an extension tube or two. The closeup lens is the easiest to use with full metering & no fuss but some compromise in image quality, the extension tube(s) give better results but usually crippling metering & dark difficult viewfinder.
Wayne J. Cosshall - 07 Feb 2007 09:19 GMT >>>> I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves >>>> etc. Can [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > some compromise in image quality, the extension tube(s) give better > results but usually crippling metering & dark difficult viewfinder. That is true, though the coupled extension tubes I use keep all the metering working. But the darker viewfinder is a bummer.
Cheers,
Wayne
 Signature Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
J. Clarke - 07 Feb 2007 13:27 GMT >>> I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves >>> etc. Can [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >Also provided you get quality ones from a known manufacturers rather >than some of the no-name closeup filters that float around. Preferably one of the achromatic types (a set of which in a diameter suitable to go on the front of a 70-300 costs pretty close to the same as a decent macro lens). The single-element type has enough chromatic aberration to be objctionable, especially with a subject such as a spider web which properly lit has high contrast and fine lines.
>Another option is an extension tube or two. > >Cheers, > >Wayne David Ruether - 07 Feb 2007 15:13 GMT > Preferably one of the achromatic types (a set of which in a diameter > suitable to go on the front of a 70-300 costs pretty close to the same > as a decent macro lens). You can buy a single 52mm-threaded 3T (strongest) Nikkor achromat for $40 at www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=158&A=details&Q=&sku=37295&is=REG&add edTroughType=categoryNavigation I did not see the 62mm that Nikon also made (perhaps Canon still offers large achromats). You do not need a perfect fit, since a stepping ring can be used to adapt it a size up or down to fit the lens. Stopped down to f11, the results should be good, though maybe not quite up to a true macro lens.
> The single-element type has enough chromatic > aberration to be objctionable, especially with a subject such as a > spider web which properly lit has high contrast and fine lines. I think single-element close-up lenses are generally useless - though Nikon made some curved-element ones that often worked well, particularly on video cameras.
>>Another option is an extension tube or two. >> >>Cheers, >> >>Wayne These generally produce poor results with zooms, and even with some non-zooms. I would favor the achromat over the tubes, especially if you can find a strong enough one in 62, 67, or 72mm thread mount (B&H sells stepping ring adapters) - and they retain all the features of the camera and lens, unlike tubes. -- David Ruether DRuether@twcny.rr.com rpn1@cornell.edu http://www.ferrario.com/ruether
Paul Furman - 07 Feb 2007 15:37 GMT > You can buy a single 52mm-threaded 3T (strongest) Nikkor achromat for $40 at > www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=158&A=details&Q=&sku=37295&is=REG&add edTroughType=categoryNavigation > I did not see the 62mm that Nikon also made (perhaps Canon still offers large > achromats). That's a good deal if it fits your lens(es?), I paid a lot for a 77mm Canon.
> You do not need a perfect fit, since a stepping ring can be used > to adapt it a size up or down to fit the lens. Stopped down to f11, the results > should be good, though maybe not quite up to a true macro lens.
> I think single-element close-up lenses are generally useless Think of the cheap kits (several sizes that can be stacked) as training wheels, it's an easy way to learn about macro shooting, not a high performance solution. Then you can move up to a real macro lens but don't expect to make award winning images. Even a good closeup lens is not that great, it's just convenient and fun to put on various lenses.
David Ruether - 07 Feb 2007 19:20 GMT >> You can buy a single 52mm-threaded 3T (strongest) Nikkor achromat for $40 at >> www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=158&A=details&Q=&sku=37295&is=REG&add edTroughType=categoryNavigation >> I did not see the 62mm that Nikon also made (perhaps Canon still offers large >> achromats).
> That's a good deal if it fits your lens(es?), I paid a lot for a 77mm Canon. Many 70-300mm zooms have a 62 or 67mm front, which a 62mm achromat will fit (with an adapter for the 67) without vignetting. A 72mm (and probably a 67mm) achromat will fit a lens with 77mm front. Normally a smaller filter would not work, but a close-up lens will.
>> You do not need a perfect fit, since a stepping ring can be used >> to adapt it a size up or down to fit the lens. Stopped down to f11, the results >> should be good, though maybe not quite up to a true macro lens. I think single-element close-up lenses are generally useless > > Think of the cheap kits (several sizes that can be stacked) as training wheels, it's an easy way to learn about macro shooting, > not a high performance solution. Yes.
> Then you can move up to a real macro lens but don't expect to make award winning images. Even a good closeup lens is not that > great, it's just convenient and fun to put on various lenses. I disagree. I have made many critically sharp images with achromats on lenses that work very well with them, so long as the lens is stopped down to about f11. BTW, the Canon 72mm achromat worked very well with my 80-200mm f2.8 Nikkor (though it made for a clumsy macro lens - I preferred more compact lenses with achromats, and even with converters and tubes added to that - and the results were often sharper at high magnification than what I could get with "macro" lenses, which often perform well up to 1:1, but sometimes not well at 2X or 3X). -- David Ruether DRuether@twcny.rr.com rpn1@cornell.edu http://www.ferrario.com/ruether
Marc Sabatella - 08 Feb 2007 04:27 GMT > The single-element type has enough chromatic > aberration to be objctionable, especially with a subject such as a > spider web which properly lit has high contrast and fine lines. True enough, although the suggestions I gave of using a lens hood and stopping way down (f/32 if you got it) do help, I find.
>>Another option is an extension tube or two. Or using a reversed prime in front of your basic zoon as a high quality close-up lens.
--------------- Marc Sabatella marc@outsideshore.com
Music, art, & educational materials Featuring "A Jazz Improvisation Primer" http://www.outsideshore.com/
Joseph Meehan - 07 Feb 2007 13:14 GMT > I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves > etc. Can I use a non-macro telephoto lens such as a Nikon 70-300 to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Paul Renfree There are many ways of skinning that cat.
Here are a few things to consider.
A longer focal length will mean you can be further away from the subject. With living subjects like a spider on the web, this can be very handy. It can even be good for still subjects as it may allow better lighting.
The sharpest and most convenient lens is likely to be a dedicated macro lens as you will not need add-ons to get the job done. They are also designed from the beginning to focus close and usually on something flat.
Zoom lenses are a special case. They are already compromises in order to zoom. If you are also asking them to focus close, then there are more compromises that need to be made and as a result there will be some decrease in image quality. However many modern lenses are doing a very good juggling act and can produce very respectable results.
Assuming you already have that lens, I would suggest buying a +2 close-up lens (fits like a filter) for that lens and see how that does for you. You will not have a large investment and it may do everything you want.
Good Luck
 Signature Joseph Meehan
Dia 's Muire duit
Paul Furman - 07 Feb 2007 15:42 GMT > I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves etc. Can > I use a non-macro telephoto lens such as a Nikon 70-300 to do this, or does > the telephoto lens need to have a macro setting? > > What about using a close up lens that screws on to a regular lens ? Another possibility is to look for a normal to wide angle non-zoom lens designed with what Nikon calls CRC (Close Range Correction). These can be close enough for spider webs, big leaves & large fearless insects and are useful in other ways.
David Ruether - 07 Feb 2007 19:31 GMT >> I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves etc. Can >> I use a non-macro telephoto lens such as a Nikon 70-300 to do this, or does >> the telephoto lens need to have a macro setting? >> >> What about using a close up lens that screws on to a regular lens ?
> Another possibility is to look for a normal to wide angle non-zoom lens designed with what Nikon calls CRC (Close Range > Correction). These can be close enough for spider webs, big leaves & large fearless insects and are useful in other ways. For relatively large "macro" subjects, this is a good idea - but as you get close to overcome the large size of the field of the WA lenses, it is too easy to cast a shadow on the subject. The 28mm f2.8 MF *AIS* Nikkor is the longest CRC lens with really good close performance, though - but somewhat too wide for easy use except maybe for flowers. One lens does stand out for close-up shooting purposes (other than the macro lenses, which also have distance-compensation to keep performance high over an unusually wide range of focus distances), and that is the 180mm f2.8 AF Nikkor - it is really excellent even on a short tube and likely also with an achromat and/or short tele converter. -- David Ruether DRuether@twcny.rr.com rpn1@cornell.edu http://www.ferrario.com/ruether
DoN. Nichols - 08 Feb 2007 03:47 GMT According to Paul Renfree <prenfree@telusplanet.net>:
> I want to be able to take close ups of spider webs, insects, leaves etc. Can > I use a non-macro telephoto lens such as a Nikon 70-300 to do this, or does > the telephoto lens need to have a macro setting? > > What about using a close up lens that screws on to a regular lens ? Aside from the other things which have been discussed, look on eBay (or other used sources) for the 200mm f4 Medical Nikkor, which has:
1) A set of six close-up lenses which can be used singly or in combination.
2) A built in ring flash around the lens, with a built-in incandescent focusing illuminator.
For the D70, the better version of this is the later one, identifiable by:
1) Color rings let into grooves in the OD of the close-up lenses.
2) Matching colors on the barrel of the lens assembly documenting which combinations of close-up lenses give which magnification.
3) A three-pin D-shaped connector for the ring flash power. (The older one uses a four-pin round connector.)
4) A switch on the battery power supply to cut the flash power by a factor of four, so you can use the closest lens combinations without overpowering the 200 ISO minimum of the D70. (The closest combinations normally are happier with an ISO/ASA of 25. (The markings on the lens are in ASA -- because it is an older lens, after all.) I think that a D200 might work just as well with the older version.
5) The battery power supply uses eight D cells on the newer unit while the older one uses two D cells for the focus illuminator, and a rather expensive and difficult to find high voltage battery for the flash voltage. (Note that I have only seen the older battery supply documented for the older lens, not personally experienced it.) What I had for the older one was the AC power supply which has no switch for reduced flash output. There was a documented cable to produce the reduced power to the flash unit, but no clue what the series resistance should be.
You will need an adaptor to provide a PC contact for the flash from the D70's hot shoe.
Exposure is done in manual mode, and turn off the auto-ISO if you normally have it on. You set the ISO on one ring, and the magnification on another ring, and this sets the aperture for the correct exposure.
Overall, it produces excellent and even illumination of close-up shots, all the way in to a 2X magnification, and it works quite well with hand-held shots. There is no focus mechanism on the lens -- you focus by changing lens to subject distance after selecting the desired magnification by your choice of close-up lenses.
It is *supposed* to document the magnification, or a frame number, in the bottom-right corner of the frame -- but with the D70's crop factor, this does not show up at all. I won't be able to use that again until Nikon comes out with a full frame DSLR. :-)
Because this is built on the base of a 200mm lens, it does an excellent job of putting some disance between you and the subject. (This was a particular benefit in its design function, as you were unlikely to get blood from the medical use on the lens elements (or yourself).
Enjoy, DoN.
 Signature Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
|
|
|