Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Will it break the $3,000 mark?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 04 Feb 2007 21:23 GMT
I'm hoping he gets $3,600 for it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/_W0QQitemZ160080947353

Rita
AustinMN - 05 Feb 2007 04:27 GMT
> I'm hoping he gets $3,600 for it.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/_W0QQitemZ160080947353
>
> Rita

The details of the bidding history look suspicious to me...people who
only bid on this guy's auctions?

Austin
Mark² - 05 Feb 2007 05:06 GMT
>> I'm hoping he gets $3,600 for it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Austin

Hmmm...  I'm thinking maybe Rita is the seller...which would explain his
endless BS and carrying on about that lens...  ;)

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

John McWilliams - 05 Feb 2007 06:22 GMT
>>> I'm hoping he gets $3,600 for it.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Hmmm...  I'm thinking maybe Rita is the seller...which would explain his
> endless BS and carrying on about that lens...  ;)

Well, if the Foo sh*ts.....

He also brags about his knowledge of eBay. fwiw, I pray it isn't so.

Signature

john mcwilliams

G.T. - 05 Feb 2007 05:07 GMT
>> I'm hoping he gets $3,600 for it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The details of the bidding history look suspicious to me...people who
> only bid on this guy's auctions?

Yeah, Ebay is really starting to suck worse than ever.  They have no
incentive to reduce shill bidding and in fact have made it harder for a
bidder to detect shill bidding.

Greg
Signature

"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons

Brian Sullivan - 05 Feb 2007 15:06 GMT
> in fact have made it harder for a
> bidder to detect shill bidding.

In what way have they made it harder?

Signature

Brian Sullivan
Courses by Wire (http://www.coursesbywire.com)

Mark² - 05 Feb 2007 15:18 GMT
>> in fact have made it harder for a
>> bidder to detect shill bidding.
>
> In what way have they made it harder?

You can no longer see WHO has placed bids.
It now just lists them as "bidder 1" bidder 2" etc.
They used to show the actual user-name of each bidder and each bid.

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Brian Sullivan - 05 Feb 2007 15:32 GMT
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:18:35 -0800, Mark? wrote:

>>> in fact have made it harder for a
>>> bidder to detect shill bidding.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It now just lists them as "bidder 1" bidder 2" etc.
> They used to show the actual user-name of each bidder and each bid.

Knowing the actual user name is not all that useful. The only thing it
provide was a purchase history and feedback score of the individual --
nothing about the bidding history -- which is really what is needed to spot
shill bidding.

Now the detailed summary of the bidding history of each bidder available is
a lot more information (and more usable) than just the purchase history of
the bidder which was available before.

I think it is potentially "easier" with the new strategy than before to
spot shill bidding.

Signature

Brian Sullivan
Courses by Wire (http://www.coursesbywire.com)

G.T. - 05 Feb 2007 19:08 GMT
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:18:35 -0800, Mark? wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> nothing about the bidding history -- which is really what is needed to spot
> shill bidding.

Historically, yes, it is useful.  On a single auction, no, it's probably
not.

It doesn't matter because Ebay does little to stop shill bidding anyway.

> Now the detailed summary of the bidding history of each bidder available is
> a lot more information (and more usable) than just the purchase history of
> the bidder which was available before.
>
> I think it is potentially "easier" with the new strategy than before to
> spot shill bidding.

Maybe.

Greg

Signature

"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons

Rita Ä Berkowitz - 05 Feb 2007 23:43 GMT
> I think it is potentially "easier" with the new strategy than before
> to spot shill bidding.

Which is totally irrelevant anyway.  The only way to secure a great deal and
be shielded from this type of nonsense is to *ONLY* seek out newly listed
improperly prices Buy It Now auctions.  Participating in a full term
auctions breaks every terrestrial and celestial boundary of stupidity since
you will be overpaying by as much as 40%.

Rita
G.T. - 06 Feb 2007 00:09 GMT
>> I think it is potentially "easier" with the new strategy than before
>> to spot shill bidding.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> since
> you will be overpaying by as much as 40%.

Only if you don't stick to your plan or if you are bidding on a rare item.

If you pick a price and stick with it whether you win or lose then you
aren't breaking boundaries of stupidity.  When I'm buying bicycle or camera
parts I pick my price, do my last second bid, if I win, I come out ahead, if
I lose, then I haven't really lost anything.  Before the $4 part that I just
won I bid on a pair of wheels that I needed asap, I searched for the lowest
Buy-it-now prices available along with several online bike shops, set my
last minute bid at 15% under those prices, and ended up with the wheels for
28% off the lowest price I had seen.  In this case if there was a shill
bidder I paid more than I would have without the shill but I still
significantly beat discount retail prices.

If you're bidding on a rare item, or any item for which you can't figure out
a reasonable price, then good luck

Greg
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 06 Feb 2007 03:00 GMT
>> Which is totally irrelevant anyway.  The only way to secure a great
>> deal and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Only if you don't stick to your plan or if you are bidding on a rare
> item.

This is the whole point.  If you win the auction you have already paid too
much.  Properly researching your purchase and formulating a delivered to
your door price is the key to success on eBay.

> If you pick a price and stick with it whether you win or lose then you
> aren't breaking boundaries of stupidity.  When I'm buying bicycle or
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> more than I would have without the shill but I still significantly
> beat discount retail prices.

Good points, but bidding in auction is wasting time that could be better
spent elsewhere.  Researching your purchase will show you that you can get
better deals elsewhere in most cases.

> If you're bidding on a rare item, or any item for which you can't
> figure out a reasonable price, then good luck

These are called "flusher" auctions.  This is where you bid the amount of
equivalent to the amount of cash you feel comfortable flushing down the
toilet.  These auctions can pay off.

Rita
Matt Clara - 09 Feb 2007 01:01 GMT
>>> Which is totally irrelevant anyway.  The only way to secure a great
>>> deal and
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> spent elsewhere.  Researching your purchase will show you that you can get
> better deals elsewhere in most cases.

Really?  Where?  KEH goes for more than ebay items in almost every instance,
and I only use the word "almost" as a weasle word--as far as I can tell,
ebay undersells KEH in _every_ instance.  So, what research shows that you
can get better deals elsewhere in most cases?

> Rita
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 09 Feb 2007 01:32 GMT
>> Good points, but bidding in auction is wasting time that could be
>> better spent elsewhere.  Researching your purchase will show you
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> as I can tell, ebay undersells KEH in _every_ instance.  So, what
> research shows that you can get better deals elsewhere in most cases?

KEH is a prime example of where *NOT* to buy and what not to pay.  As for
other research, you have the resources right in front of you.  If you don't
know how to research any purchase than this is beyond the scope of this
conversation.

Rita
Skip - 09 Feb 2007 03:04 GMT
>>>> Which is totally irrelevant anyway.  The only way to secure a great
>>>> deal and
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> can tell, ebay undersells KEH in _every_ instance.  So, what research
> shows that you can get better deals elsewhere in most cases?

I don't know about now, but when I was trying to buy a 100-400 IS lens, the
idiots on ebay kept bidding them up to within $20 of new retail.  Irritating
as the devil.  If I want to make sure that I'm getting what I think I am, I
buy from KEH, yeah, every once in a while, it costs a little more, but it
saves me irritation.

Signature

Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
www.pbase.com/skipm

RichA - 06 Feb 2007 22:37 GMT
> > I think it is potentially "easier" with the new strategy than before
> > to spot shill bidding.
>
> Which is totally irrelevant anyway.  The only way to secure a great deal and
> be shielded from this type of nonsense is to *ONLY* seek out newly listed
> improperly prices Buy It Now auctions.

This happens.  I got an Olympus 24mm f2.8 OM Zuiko for $35.00.
Generally on full auction they go for around $120.00.
Rare, but they do happen.  As long as you have zombies willing to bid
beyond new retail (and Ebay is rife with them)
then "cheap" full-term auctions are rare.
Matt Clara - 09 Feb 2007 01:04 GMT
>> I think it is potentially "easier" with the new strategy than before
>> to spot shill bidding.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> since
> you will be overpaying by as much as 40%.

But, if you follow ebay completed items, you consistently see the Buy It Now
items having no takers, with their Buy It Now prices higher than what the
"really" completed items are, um, completing for.
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 09 Feb 2007 01:33 GMT
>> Which is totally irrelevant anyway.  The only way to secure a great
>> deal and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> It Now items having no takers, with their Buy It Now prices higher
> than what the "really" completed items are, um, completing for.

Which means you are looking at the wrong ones.  Always look at the ones that
close with 15-minutes of being listed, these are the bargains that you
missed.

Rita
G.T. - 05 Feb 2007 19:07 GMT
>> in fact have made it harder for a
>> bidder to detect shill bidding.
>
> In what way have they made it harder?

They don't show user ids any more on the bid page.  That may have
changed with the huge amount of negative publicity Ebay has received
recently regarding shill bidding.

Greg

Signature

"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons

Ken Lucke - 05 Feb 2007 20:39 GMT
> >> in fact have made it harder for a
> >> bidder to detect shill bidding.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> changed with the huge amount of negative publicity Ebay has received
> recently regarding shill bidding.

I saw that on that page (the Nikkor lens), but when I look at other
auctions I have in my "watch" list, they still show the bidder(s)' IDs.
I haven't listed anything for a while for sale... is there a preference
in the listing template to turn this on or off now?  COuld that be why
some have the "bider #" only and others have the bidders' IDs?

Signature

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
independence.
       -- Charles A. Beard

G.T. - 05 Feb 2007 23:05 GMT
>> >> in fact have made it harder for a
>> >> bidder to detect shill bidding.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> in the listing template to turn this on or off now?  COuld that be why
> some have the "bider #" only and others have the bidders' IDs?

That's a good question.  Maybe it has to do with the expense of the items?
I just won a $4 bicycle part and in that auction it showed all the real IDs.

Greg
Ken Lucke - 05 Feb 2007 23:27 GMT
> >> >> in fact have made it harder for a
> >> >> bidder to detect shill bidding.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> That's a good question.  Maybe it has to do with the expense of the items?

That was another one of my thoughts, but I haven't bothered to go check
on any other high-priced items.

> I just won a $4 bicycle part and in that auction it showed all the real IDs.
>
> Greg

BTW, if you move your mouse pointer over the list of "bidder #x", it
does show more information about the bidding history of that particular
bidder, or at least it does for me.

Signature

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
independence.
       -- Charles A. Beard

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.