Welcome to planned obsolescence. I do not recall any cogent explanation from
camera manufacturers why they change their raw file formats with new camera
models.
Nikon NX is a very intriguing and worthwhile tool. However it is, in the
final analysis, merely a raw converter.
If you want to get the most out of your D80 I urge you to invest in
Photoshop or Elements, the Adobe converter has been updated for the D80, and
learn to process your raw images appropriately. A standalone raw converter
is not enough.
I had been using NX in conjunction with CS2. However the new Adobe converter
introduced with the CS3 beta has many more processing options.
> Welcome to planned obsolescence. I do not recall any cogent
> explanation from camera manufacturers why they change their raw file
> formats with new camera models.
They don't, they just change the EXIF info in the image file, and that's
what the RAW software reads to verify the format.
You'll notice that there are several programs available that open newer
camera files without being updated because they don't use the header
info, they simply read the EXIF and the RAW data and don't care about
mode numbers. I haven't examined them, but I'd bet the D80 and D200 file
formats are identical except for the EXIF info.
> Nikon NX is a very intriguing and worthwhile tool. However it is, in
> the final analysis, merely a raw converter.
Actually Capture NX is a conveter and image editor (although it's not
Photoshop). It does more than just convert RAW files, however it's a bit
fussy in Windows Vista, so I've held off buying it until it's
compatible. I'm using a plugin in Photoshop to edit Nikon D80 files
right now, although I'd rather use Capture since it does a better job of
converting the image.