 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / February 2007Photoshop Plugin
Anyone know of a Depth of Field plugin for photoshop? > Anyone know of a Depth of Field plugin for photoshop? What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? : > Anyone know of a Depth of Field plugin for photoshop? : : What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? Yeah... I know the one. Wether or not you can drill a hole deep enough in your monitor to hold the tape is another thing entirely... Douglas >> Anyone know of a Depth of Field plugin for photoshop? >What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? Keep the image on your computer screen sharp while your head moves forward and back?  Signature--- Paul J. Gans > What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? It would allow you to retouch the image to make the subject more in focus by blurring the background and foreground to a controlled degree. > > What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? > > It would allow you to retouch the image to make the subject more in focus > by blurring the background and foreground to a controlled degree. So, like, hit 'q,' paint a gradient, hit 'q' again, run a blur filter. No plugin needed. >>> What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > So, like, hit 'q,' paint a gradient, hit 'q' again, run a blur filter. > No plugin needed. Doesn't work. Sure, you can blur top or bottom, or one side or the other, but that does not simulate making the depth of field shallower. All it does is blur part of the picture, with both near and far objects at the same part of the gradient being blurred equally. Big whoop. SignatureWaddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor Cj I agree with you completely. I'm looking for a more believable effect. >>>> What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? >>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > of > the gradient being blurred equally. Big whoop. >>>> What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? >>> It would allow you to retouch the image to make the subject more in focus [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > blur part of the picture, with both near and far objects at the same part of > the gradient being blurred equally. Big whoop. This will work fine where the image recedes summat uniformly from one side or the other. SignatureJohn McWilliams > >>>> What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? > >>> It would allow you to retouch the image to make the subject more in focus [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > This will work fine where the image recedes summat uniformly from one > side or the other. Works when it recedes radially, too - remember gradients can be radial as well as linear. SignatureYou need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard > > >>>> What would a depth of field plugin for Photoshop do? > > >>> It would allow you to retouch the image to make the subject more in [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Works when it recedes radially, too - remember gradients can be radial > as well as linear. Sorry, forgot the smiley, lest you take me seriously... SignatureYou need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard >>> So, like, hit 'q,' paint a gradient, hit 'q' again, run a blur filter. >>> No plugin needed. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > This will work fine where the image recedes summat uniformly from one side > or the other. How would it work fine if objects at the same distance from the camera as the subject were not in focus but the subject was. You obviously don't understand depth of field. "John McWilliams" wrote in message >> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:37:35 -0800, >> > This will work fine where the image recedes summat uniformly from one side > or the other. Thanks John. I laughed so hard I pissed my pants. > "John McWilliams" wrote in message >> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:37:35 -0800, >> >> This will work fine where the image recedes summat uniformly from one side >> or the other. > Thanks John. I laughed so hard I pissed my pants. Well, you made my day. Sayonara. Signaturelsmft "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein >Anyone know of a Depth of Field plugin for photoshop? How 'bout http://photoshop.pluginsworld.com/plugin.php?directory=adobe&software=photoshop& plugin=717 Thanks Avery >>Anyone know of a Depth of Field plugin for photoshop? > > How 'bout > > http://photoshop.pluginsworld.com/plugin.php?directory=adobe&software=photoshop& plugin=717 http://photoshop.pluginsworld.com/plugin.php?directory=adobe&software=photosho > p&plugin=717 That is one impressive plug-in. The gallery is well worth visiting. SignatureWaddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.