Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Using Nikon non-AI lenses on D70, etc.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alexander Arnakis - 20 Jan 2007 17:28 GMT
According to the D70 user's manual (pages 183-184), it's OK to mount
manual-focus AI lenses on the camera, but not the early non-AI lenses.
Is this incorrect, or am I missing something?

Looking at the camera's lens mount, there's nothing that would
interfere with a non-AI lens' aperture ring, except perhaps the tab
for the minimum-aperture switch (at about the 8 o'clock position while
looking at the camera). Yet this tab has enough "play" so that it is
pushed slightly aside to clear the non-AI ring. There's no potential
for damage, unless the ring on the lens is unusually wide.

Anyway, I've put a non-AI lens on my D70, and taken pictures. (In
manual mode.) It works! Obviously, you don't have autofocus or
metering, but exposure by trial and error is not that big a deal
because you can just delete pictures until you have the exposure
right. In effect, you have the digital equivalent of an F2 with a
non-metered prism.

A bigger problem than lack of metering is the difficulty of manual
focusing with the D70's viewfinder. I guess this could be solved with
a Katz Eye replacement screen.

It would seem that, likewise, non-AI lenses could be used with all of
Nikon's lower-end digital cameras, from the D40 to the D80.
Rudy Benner - 20 Jan 2007 17:40 GMT
> According to the D70 user's manual (pages 183-184), it's OK to mount
> manual-focus AI lenses on the camera, but not the early non-AI lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> It would seem that, likewise, non-AI lenses could be used with all of
> Nikon's lower-end digital cameras, from the D40 to the D80.

Katz Eye, works good, at least better than the original. Must have with
manual telephoto lenses.

For lens compatibility .... look here.

http://www.bythom.com/lensacronyms.htm

Why re-invent the wheel.
Alexander Arnakis - 20 Jan 2007 19:31 GMT
>For lens compatibility .... look here.
>
>http://www.bythom.com/lensacronyms.htm
>
>Why re-invent the wheel.

He just says, "DO NOT USE" in regard to the the pre-AI lenses on
digital cameras. Not helpful. It's a little more nuanced than that.
Duncan Chesley - 20 Jan 2007 18:17 GMT
>A bigger problem than lack of metering is the difficulty of manual
>focusing with the D70's viewfinder. I guess this could be solved with
>a Katz Eye replacement screen.

I keep reading this comment. My D70 has a viewfinder LED that
illuminates when a manual lens is focussed. It is quite sensitive. I
can select the focus area as I would with the kit lens. I haven't used
my manual lenses much, but, when I have, I haven't had any problems
focussing with the LED indicator. The D70's viewfinder quality is not
part of the process. Am I missing something?

Cheers,
DuncanC
Alexander Arnakis - 20 Jan 2007 19:59 GMT
>I keep reading this comment. My D70 has a viewfinder LED that
>illuminates when a manual lens is focussed. It is quite sensitive. I
>can select the focus area as I would with the kit lens. I haven't used
>my manual lenses much, but, when I have, I haven't had any problems
>focussing with the LED indicator. The D70's viewfinder quality is not
>part of the process. Am I missing something?

Yes, I've found that the "electronic range finder" feature works
equally well with non-AI lenses as it does with AF lenses in manual
mode. One problem that I have, in both cases, is that if objects at
widely differing distances are close together in the center of the
picture, the electronic indicator will signal "in focus" if you
actually focus on *any* of the objects. That's why I find a
split-image rangefinder a lot easier to use.
Duncan Chesley - 20 Jan 2007 20:30 GMT
> if objects at
>widely differing distances are close together in the center of the
>picture, the electronic indicator will signal "in focus" if you
>actually focus on *any* of the objects. That's why I find a
>split-image rangefinder a lot easier to use.

Gotcha.  Thanks, A.

Cheers,
DuncanC
Jim - 20 Jan 2007 18:21 GMT
> According to the D70 user's manual (pages 183-184), it's OK to mount
> manual-focus AI lenses on the camera, but not the early non-AI lenses.
> Is this incorrect, or am I missing something?

Some non-AI lenses indeed can damage your lens mount.  Nikon does not
cover this under warranty. Other non-AI lenses do not. Once must also
be wary of converted (non-AI to AI ) lenses as the conversion process
may not have been complete.

John White has a pretty good expanation on his site.

http://aiconversions.com/index.html

Jim

Signature

Jim     <jen....not....home..remvdots...@....yahoo

Nicholas O. Lindan - 20 Jan 2007 19:13 GMT
> Looking at the camera's lens mount, there's nothing that would
> interfere with a non-AI lens' aperture ring, except perhaps the tab
> for the minimum-aperture switch (at about the 8 o'clock position while
> looking at the camera). Yet this tab has enough "play" so that it is
> pushed slightly aside to clear the non-AI ring.

The tab isn't designed to be 'pushed aside'.  The usual
result of such a mating is the tab is pushed aside to the
extent it is no longer attached to the camera but is
laying on the floor.

Even with the lens finessed on to the camera the tab may drag
on the aperture ring, causing the camera endless confusion
when it tries to meter.

AI Nikon bodies designed to take NAI lenses have a mechanism
to lock the tab out of the way.

If the lens has been AI'd it will be safe.

Instructions for AI'ing lenses abound on the 'net.  IIRC,
there are still people who will AI lenses - correctly -
using a milling machine for $25 or some such reasonable
amount.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.nolindan.com/da/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

Alexander Arnakis - 20 Jan 2007 20:27 GMT
>The tab isn't designed to be 'pushed aside'.  The usual
>result of such a mating is the tab is pushed aside to the
>extent it is no longer attached to the camera but is
>laying on the floor.

Well, one must obviously be very careful when trying a particular
combination for the first time. I found, with the non-AI lenses I
tried on my D70 camera, that the amount of deflection was absolutely
minimal, and well within the designed side-to-side range of motion of
the switch tab. If the aperture ring on a particular lens is a
slightly larger diameter, you could have a problem. The answer is
never to force anything, and always look carefully at what you're
doing.

Nikon makes such blanket statements to protect themselves legally. If
something goes wrong, they're not responsible. But sometimes you can
get more use out of a product by "pushing the envelope." Examples are
making "off-label" use of medications, or overclocking computer
processors.

>Even with the lens finessed on to the camera the tab may drag
>on the aperture ring, causing the camera endless confusion
>when it tries to meter.

You can't meter anyway with a non-CPU lens. You have to use the camera
in full manual mode when using a non-AI lens. The minimum-aperture
switch is inoperative in such a scenario.
William Graham - 20 Jan 2007 21:18 GMT
>>The tab isn't designed to be 'pushed aside'.  The usual
>>result of such a mating is the tab is pushed aside to the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> in full manual mode when using a non-AI lens. The minimum-aperture
> switch is inoperative in such a scenario.

I had my F5 converted so the little tab on the mount could be flipped over
out of the way when mounting non-AI lenses....Can this type of conversion be
put on the new digital cameras? - And, if not, then why not?
Alexander Arnakis - 21 Jan 2007 01:04 GMT
>I had my F5 converted so the little tab on the mount could be flipped over
>out of the way when mounting non-AI lenses....Can this type of conversion be
>put on the new digital cameras? - And, if not, then why not?

I think what you're talking about is a *different* tab than the one
that causes the problems on the digital cameras. If I'm correct,
you're referring to the tab that engages the auto-indexing ridge on
the lens (that is, an AI lens), and the modification you had made (the
flip-up tab) was to make your camera work like the F3, the F4, or the
FM (allowing stop-down metering for unconverted non-AI lenses).

This is not an issue with the low-end digital cameras (up to the D80)
because they don't *have* that type of coupling. The lens information
is transferred to the camera body through the electrical contacts on
the inside of the lens mount.

The problem with mounting non-AI lenses on the digital bodies is
centered around the minimum-aperture switch tab, which is on the
*opposite* side of the lens mount from the tab you're talking about.
Unfortunately, this switch tab can't be retrofitted to flip out of the
way, although on the D40, it's designed to retract.
William Graham - 21 Jan 2007 01:10 GMT
>>I had my F5 converted so the little tab on the mount could be flipped over
>>out of the way when mounting non-AI lenses....Can this type of conversion
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Unfortunately, this switch tab can't be retrofitted to flip out of the
> way, although on the D40, it's designed to retract.

You are correct....I was thinking of the "pre-AI" tab.
bjw@mambo.ucolick.org - 22 Jan 2007 08:57 GMT
> >The tab isn't designed to be 'pushed aside'.  The usual
> >result of such a mating is the tab is pushed aside to the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> in full manual mode when using a non-AI lens. The minimum-aperture
> switch is inoperative in such a scenario.

Nicholas is thinking of the aperture-following tab which is how
the aperture ring position of a manual focus AI lens is sensed by
the camera.  This is at about 2 o'clock when you look at the
camera from the front.  You're thinking of the minimum aperture
tab which is at about 8 o'clock.  I presume that the D70 does not
have the aperture-following tab since it can't meter with manual
focus lenses.  On some bodies (FM, FE, F3, but not FE2, FM2 etc)
the aperture-following tab could be flipped up so you could
mount a non-AI lens without crushing it.

Some non-AI 3rd-party lenses had an aperture ring that
didn't project very far back and you could sometimes mount
these without fouling the tab, although it was marginal.
Nicholas O. Lindan - 22 Jan 2007 14:41 GMT
> Alexander Arnakis wrote:
> > "Nicholas O. Lindan" <see@sig.com>
> > >The tab isn't designed to be 'pushed aside'.

> Nicholas is thinking of the aperture-following tab [which isn't
> the max-aperture tab under discussion]

I plead guilty as charged.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.nolindan.com/da/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

Jim - 20 Jan 2007 19:55 GMT
> According to the D70 user's manual (pages 183-184), it's OK to mount
> manual-focus AI lenses on the camera, but not the early non-AI lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> It would seem that, likewise, non-AI lenses could be used with all of
> Nikon's lower-end digital cameras, from the D40 to the D80.

As it happens, I own one pre-ai lens.  It binds against something long
before the lens is fully seated.  So, there is interference somewhere, and
the rabbit ears are not the source.
It is also impossible to fit this lens on my F3 until I flip up the little
tab which engages the aperature ring.  Once you flip that thing up on the
F3, the lens mounts quite well.  However, you are left with stop down
metering.

If this particular pre-ai lens is one that you will use often, you can have
it converted (AI'd).  They conversion involves removing a projection
somewhere which prevents the mounting to succeed.

Jim
Alexander Arnakis - 20 Jan 2007 20:59 GMT
>As it happens, I own one pre-ai lens.  It binds against something long
>before the lens is fully seated.  So, there is interference somewhere, and
>the rabbit ears are not the source.

Yes, it's the minimum-aperture switch tab, which is at the 8 o'clock
position (as you're looking at the front of the camera) just outside
the lens mount ring.

On the D40, this tab retracts inside the camera body, On the other
low-end Nikon digital cameras, there *may* be enough "wiggle room" in
the tab to clear the lens aperture ring. Knowing what to look at, you
may be able to coax the lens into position. Don't force anything.

>It is also impossible to fit this lens on my F3 until I flip up the little
>tab which engages the aperature ring.  Once you flip that thing up on the
>F3, the lens mounts quite well.  However, you are left with stop down
>metering.

That's the well-known problem with the automatic-indexing ridge and
tab. (The FM has the flip-up tab also, while the FM2 doesn't.) The
low-end Nikon digitals don't have this problem, since they don't use
mechanical indexing.

>If this particular pre-ai lens is one that you will use often, you can have
>it converted (AI'd).  They conversion involves removing a projection
>somewhere which prevents the mounting to succeed.

In my opinion, the proper way to convert a pre-AI lens is to use a
Nikon factory replacement aperture ring. (Some are still available.)
Otherwise, the conversion involves milling or grinding the original
ring, and there are not that many craftsmen who can do a really good
job at it. I've seen lots of cases where someone just crudely used a
Dremel tool to grind away at the ring. Maybe it works, but it reduces
the lens' resale value to zero.

Faced with chancing this kind of conversion, I would just try to buy
an equivalent AI lens.
badger.badger - 20 Jan 2007 23:51 GMT
> In my opinion, the proper way to convert a pre-AI lens is to use a
> Nikon factory replacement aperture ring. (Some are still available.)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Faced with chancing this kind of conversion, I would just try to buy
> an equivalent AI lens.

I have what turns out to be ex+ 50 1.4 Nikkor I bought to convert,
thinking it was a user from the description, needless to say I'm holding
off and waiting for a user, but for what it cost it wouldn't be a cost
loss, rather I won't butcher such a good lens that I can use as it is on
my older Nikon gear. AI 50 1.4 Nikkors (even 'users') go for a LOT more
money here (UK) than early lenses, so an older lens and conversion is
much more cost effective.

I have a number of older lenses (primes and a couple of zooms) that will
fit, but modern lighter weigth zooms are easier to live with for 'carry'
use IMHO.

Badger.
Matt Clara - 20 Jan 2007 21:26 GMT
> According to the D70 user's manual (pages 183-184), it's OK to mount
> manual-focus AI lenses on the camera, but not the early non-AI lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> It would seem that, likewise, non-AI lenses could be used with all of
> Nikon's lower-end digital cameras, from the D40 to the D80.

Your camera costs $700, most non-ai lenses sell for less than $100,
conversion costs $25.  I think "pushing the envelope" doesn't make good
sense in this case.
William Graham - 20 Jan 2007 22:22 GMT
"Matt Clara" <hey.wood.y@buzz.off> wrote in message >>

Anyway, I've put a non-AI lens on my D70, and taken pictures. (In
>> manual mode.) It works! Obviously, you don't have autofocus or
>> metering, but exposure by trial and error is not that big a deal
>> because you can just delete pictures until you have the exposure
>> right. In effect, you have the digital equivalent of an F2 with a
>> non-metered prism.

You should be able to do this with any digital camera without having to take
the picture....Just look in the LCD display "viewfinder" and adjust the
"exposure" until the picture looks right, and then take the picture....I
wonder why they don't give you this ability?
J. Clarke - 20 Jan 2007 22:35 GMT
>"Matt Clara" <hey.wood.y@buzz.off> wrote in message >>
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>"exposure" until the picture looks right, and then take the picture....I
>wonder why they don't give you this ability?

This question gets beaten to death at least once a week.  The D70 is a
single-lens reflex, there is a mirror between the lens and the sensor,
there is no way to get a live preview on it, or any other single lens
reflex except the Olympus E-330 and its Panasonic cousin, which have
separate sensors for preview and for taking.
Matt Clara - 21 Jan 2007 00:19 GMT
>>"Matt Clara" <hey.wood.y@buzz.off> wrote in message >>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> reflex except the Olympus E-330 and its Panasonic cousin, which have
> separate sensors for preview and for taking.

He means review the picture after you take it and then adjust for exposure
until you get the picture right.
William Graham - 21 Jan 2007 01:03 GMT
>>>"Matt Clara" <hey.wood.y@buzz.off> wrote in message >>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> He means review the picture after you take it and then adjust for exposure
> until you get the picture right.

Well, that isn't what I meant, but with a camera that gives you a running
preview on a liquid crystal screen, I would think that you could adjust your
exposure using that screen....With a single lens reflex camera, that has a
mirror in front of the sensor, you apparently don't have such a picture, and
have to use the viewfinder just like you do with a film camera, so you
wouldn't be able to do what I was thinking of.....What the hell, taking the
picture doesn't cost anything but a little battery power, so that's just as
good anyway......
J. Clarke - 21 Jan 2007 01:31 GMT
>>>"Matt Clara" <hey.wood.y@buzz.off> wrote in message >>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>He means review the picture after you take it and then adjust for exposure
>until you get the picture right.

How do you do that without "having to take the picture"?  Please read
what he wrote, not what you think he wrote.
Matt Clara - 21 Jan 2007 02:22 GMT
>>>>"Matt Clara" <hey.wood.y@buzz.off> wrote in message >>
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> How do you do that without "having to take the picture"?  Please read
> what he wrote, not what you think he wrote.

My apologies--you are correct.
Alexander Arnakis - 21 Jan 2007 01:22 GMT
>This question gets beaten to death at least once a week.  The D70 is a
>single-lens reflex, there is a mirror between the lens and the sensor,
>there is no way to get a live preview on it, or any other single lens
>reflex except the Olympus E-330 and its Panasonic cousin, which have
>separate sensors for preview and for taking.

If Nikon wanted to have a live preview feature using only one sensor,
they could use a fixed "pellicle" mirror like the one in the old F2
High Speed. Part of the light from the image would go straight to the
sensor while the rest would be diverted to the viewfinder. Maybe this
would be more expensive than could be justified.
William Graham - 21 Jan 2007 01:32 GMT
>>This question gets beaten to death at least once a week.  The D70 is a
>>single-lens reflex, there is a mirror between the lens and the sensor,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> sensor while the rest would be diverted to the viewfinder. Maybe this
> would be more expensive than could be justified.

Or, with a digital slr, they could have a, "mirror lockup mode" where you
wouldn't use the optical viewfinder at all, but just used a liquid crystal
display, like the point & shoots do.....
Alexander Arnakis - 21 Jan 2007 04:01 GMT
>Or, with a digital slr, they could have a, "mirror lockup mode" where you
>wouldn't use the optical viewfinder at all, but just used a liquid crystal
>display, like the point & shoots do.....

You'd have to disable the shutter, too (have it open all the time).

Why stop there? Eliminate the shutter, the mirror, and the pentaprism
altogether and have an interchangeable-lens point-and-shoot.

This would be a lot cheaper, but it wouldn't be what we want in a
DSLR.
William Graham - 21 Jan 2007 20:47 GMT
>>Or, with a digital slr, they could have a, "mirror lockup mode" where you
>>wouldn't use the optical viewfinder at all, but just used a liquid crystal
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This would be a lot cheaper, but it wouldn't be what we want in a
> DSLR.

Yes, of course....The sensing plane would have to be active all the
time....The "shutter" would just be the electronic recording
circuitry.....But I see people doing this already with their digital
cameras....They hold them at arm's length and look at the LCD on the back of
the camera....Then, when they like what they see, they "take" the
picture....Since the camera is "taking" the picture continuously, I assume
that when they press the "shutter" button, they are just activating the
recording circuitry......Either that, or their cameras have two sensing
planes.....One for the viewfinder only. - Kind of like the old twin lens
reflexes......
Alexander Arnakis - 21 Jan 2007 01:12 GMT
>Your camera costs $700, most non-ai lenses sell for less than $100,
>conversion costs $25.  I think "pushing the envelope" doesn't make good
>sense in this case.

You're right -- I wouldn't do this on a regular basis, since I have
plenty of AI lenses. I just wanted to see if it could be done. But who
knows? Somebody out there may need to do this for one reason or
another.
Geo - 21 Jan 2007 04:08 GMT
ith
> > a Katz Eye replacement screen.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> conversion costs $25.  I think "pushing the envelope" doesn't make good
> sense in this case.

could you tell me more about the conversioin? or a link..

i just got myself a used-refurbished D100 and i have 4 nikon non-af
lenses

g
David Dyer-Bennet - 21 Jan 2007 16:55 GMT
> ith
>>> a Katz Eye replacement screen.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> could you tell me more about the conversioin? or a link..

To understand the process in detail, this is pretty good:
<http://www.chr-breitkopf.de/photo/aiconv.en.html>.  (The URL is .de but
the pages are in English).

Here's another do-it-yourself page with drawings rather than photos:
<http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-107.html>

What I would really want is an independent repair shop that was doing
this work, and my quick-and-dirty Googling didn't come up with who's
doing that today.

> i just got myself a used-refurbished D100 and i have 4 nikon non-af
> lenses

How old are they?  Are they actually pre-AI?  Non-AI lenses haven't been
made since something like 1980.  You may not have a problem at all.

This table <http://www.cameraquest.com/aidaiais.htm> may help you
identify exactly what you have (though some pictures would have been nice).
Geo - 21 Jan 2007 20:55 GMT
ahh

i once heard about this dude that modified the mount to install a
chip-sensor to enable the lens to meter with an AF body.. i thought that
was it

thenk you for the links though..very interesting

g

-refurbished D100 and i have 4 nikon non-af
> > lenses
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> This table <http://www.cameraquest.com/aidaiais.htm> may help you
> identify exactly what you have (though some pictures would have been nice).
Alexander Arnakis - 21 Jan 2007 23:21 GMT
>i once heard about this dude that modified the mount to install a
>chip-sensor to enable the lens to meter with an AF body.. i thought that
>was it

He's fallen out of favor, since he seems to have stiffed a few
people....
David Dyer-Bennet - 21 Jan 2007 04:32 GMT
> According to the D70 user's manual (pages 183-184), it's OK to mount
> manual-focus AI lenses on the camera, but not the early non-AI lenses.
> Is this incorrect, or am I missing something?

That's correct.

> Looking at the camera's lens mount, there's nothing that would
> interfere with a non-AI lens' aperture ring, except perhaps the tab
> for the minimum-aperture switch (at about the 8 o'clock position while
> looking at the camera). Yet this tab has enough "play" so that it is
> pushed slightly aside to clear the non-AI ring. There's no potential
> for damage, unless the ring on the lens is unusually wide.

That tab is the issue.  On the old FM, for example (in the first
generation of AI cameras, so lots of pre-AI lenses were still around),
that tab can be flipped up out of the way.  Just shoving it out of the
way will stress things, maybe causing functional difficulties (increased
friction somewhere because of the stress?) and maybe even breaking the
tab or the ring.
Alexander Arnakis - 21 Jan 2007 23:17 GMT
>That tab is the issue.  On the old FM, for example (in the first
>generation of AI cameras, so lots of pre-AI lenses were still around),
>that tab can be flipped up out of the way.  Just shoving it out of the
>way will stress things, maybe causing functional difficulties (increased
>friction somewhere because of the stress?) and maybe even breaking the
>tab or the ring.

The flip-up tab on the FM, as well as on the F2A, F2AS, F3, F4, etc.,
is for engaging the automatic-indexing ring on the lens. The problem
on the digital cameras revolves around an entirely different tab, that
for the minimum-aperture switch (it's on the opposite side of the lens
mount). Actually, the low-end digital cameras (up to the D80) don't
*have* the tab you're talking about. They have an entirely different
system for reading the lens aperture. Conversely, the FM doesn't have
a minimum-aperture switch, since the switch is used for
automatic-exposure modes.
Robert - 22 Jan 2007 13:11 GMT
>  > Anyway, I've put a non-AI lens on my D70, and taken pictures. (In
> manual mode.) It works! Obviously, you don't have autofocus or
> metering, but exposure by trial and error is not that big a deal
> because you can just delete pictures until you have the exposure
> right.

Does the D70 have a 'depth of field preview' button?  You could use
that and allow the metering to tell you what shutter speed to set.

> A bigger problem than lack of metering is the difficulty of manual
> focusing with the D70's viewfinder.

Why is it more difficult to focus in the D70 than on a manual focus
film SLR?   I am interested because this is the route I eventually plan
to use when I stop using film.

Robert
tomm42 - 22 Jan 2007 14:45 GMT
> >  > Anyway, I've put a non-AI lens on my D70, and taken pictures. (In
> > manual mode.) It works! Obviously, you don't have autofocus or
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Robert

The D70 like a lot of the cheaper DSLRs use a mirror prism with out
much magnification in the finder, makes for  tunnel effect viewing. The
D200 and D80 both use prisms and magnification like film SLRs. Since
the size of the sensor is 1/2 that of 35mm film the view finders on
these cameras seem small too. though they are as bright as a film SLR.
DSLRs are also built with autofocus in mind so the viewing screens
aren't as good as with film SLRs. Though I find my D200 reasonably easy
to focus with Ai lenses.

Tom
Floyd L. Davidson - 22 Jan 2007 19:06 GMT
>>  > Anyway, I've put a non-AI lens on my D70, and taken pictures. (In
>> manual mode.) It works! Obviously, you don't have autofocus or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Does the D70 have a 'depth of field preview' button?  You could use
>that and allow the metering to tell you what shutter speed to set.

That isn't as practical as simply shooting off an exposure and
then looking at a histogram to get a rough idea of the exposure,
or at a "blink-on-over-exposure" LCD display to get a more
precise measure.

It takes anywhere from 1 to 5 quick exposures, which cost
nothing with digital, and allows *very* precise exposure
settings.

>> A bigger problem than lack of metering is the difficulty of manual
>> focusing with the D70's viewfinder.
>
>Why is it more difficult to focus in the D70 than on a manual focus
>film SLR?   I am interested because this is the route I eventually plan
>to use when I stop using film.

Modern digital cameras have an Auto Focus indicator, but don't
have manual focusing aides such as a split prism and microprism
collar that was typical of a manual focus film camera.

Those aides are not necessary, but they certainly are nice!
Because the split prism is located dead center in the viewfinder
it is easy to maintain framing/composition and focus at the same
time.  Your eye doesn't have to move.  With an AF camera you can
look at the AF indicator while focusing, but it is typically
down in the right hand corner of the view finder, which makes it
more difficult to see while trying to hand hold.

You can get replacement focusing screens for many camera models.

  http://www.katzeyeoptics.com

Everyone who has used them seems to say good things.  (I have
one on a Nikon D2x, and find it well worth the price.)

All told, non-AI lenses are a bit of a pain.  And sometimes AI
lenses are too, compared to AF lenses.  For some things they
are well worth keeping if you already own them, and for a few
things they are a better buy than a new AF lense (macro work,
for example).  But for sports, taking pictures of children, or
anything that moves...  Auto Focus is *fabulous*.

If you are a bit of a techie and like playing with mechanical
devices, consider MF lenses.  If not, stick with AF lenses and
don't even bother thinking about older lenses.

Signature

Floyd L. Davidson            <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)                         floyd@apaflo.com

Alexander Arnakis - 22 Jan 2007 19:12 GMT
>Does the D70 have a 'depth of field preview' button?  You could use
>that and allow the metering to tell you what shutter speed to set.

The D70 has DOF preview, but it only works with CPU lenses. Thus, it
can't be used for stop-down metering.

>Why is it more difficult to focus in the D70 than on a manual focus
>film SLR?   I am interested because this is the route I eventually plan
>to use when I stop using film.

First, it has a relatively dim viewfinder (this problem has apparently
been corrected in the D200). But more important is the lack of a
split-image rangefinder. This can be addressed by getting a
replacement Katz Eye focusing screen for $105.
Robert - 24 Jan 2007 08:47 GMT
> >Why is it more difficult to focus in the D70 than on a manual focus
> >film SLR?   I am interested because this is the route I eventually plan
> >to use when I stop using film.

> First, it has a relatively dim viewfinder (this problem has apparently
> been corrected in the D200). But more important is the lack of a
> split-image rangefinder. This can be addressed by getting a
> replacement Katz Eye focusing screen for $105.

Aha, that's interesting.  I find that I never use the split prisms and
on my film cameras; so I usually replace the standard screen with a
plain one.  Sounds like I woul dlike the default screen of the D
cameras.

Robert
David Dyer-Bennet - 22 Jan 2007 21:46 GMT
>>  > Anyway, I've put a non-AI lens on my D70, and taken pictures. (In
>> manual mode.) It works! Obviously, you don't have autofocus or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Does the D70 have a 'depth of field preview' button?  You could use
> that and allow the metering to tell you what shutter speed to set.

Is the meter active?  I think it may notice such a lens is mounted and
completely disable the display.

>> A bigger problem than lack of metering is the difficulty of manual
>> focusing with the D70's viewfinder.
>
> Why is it more difficult to focus in the D70 than on a manual focus
> film SLR?   I am interested because this is the route I eventually plan
> to use when I stop using film.

Different focusing screen -- optimized for *seeing*, not for focusing
(since the AF system is expected to be doing the focusing).  You can use
the focus confirmation light from the AF system, which helps some.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.