"The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
three levels." The manual also talks about setting the quality.
I want to use the highest level and try shooting NEF+JPEG using the Nikon
D200, and would like to know how well it works and if it is worth the
effort? Are the files smaller when shooting NEF+JPG? I like to print with
RAW, but also like to use .JPG for WEB pages. Maybe there is a good WEB
site with suggestions.
http://www2.hagenhosting.com/~naborswe/Libya/Libyaindex.html (one of my WEB
pages)
Of course, I can eventently answer these questions by experimenting, but
comments from users allways helps? Maybe I can get it right the first time
with a few suggestions!!
Robert
Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 09 Jan 2007 01:22 GMT
>"The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
>various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>D200, and would like to know how well it works and if it is worth the
>effort? Are the files smaller when shooting NEF+JPG?
?? Smaller than what? You have the raw NEF AND the JPEG at whatever quality
setting you chose. This uses the most storage space possible.
>I like to print with
>RAW, but also like to use .JPG for WEB pages. Maybe there is a good WEB
>site with suggestions.
So just make jpgs from the raw files, there are several raw processors
which will batch process you files for you. what do you currently use to
process your NEFs now?

Signature
Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardGRuf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
Robert Nabors - 09 Jan 2007 04:23 GMT
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:01:12 -0800, in rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
> "Robert
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> which will batch process you files for you. what do you currently use to
> process your NEFs now?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ed, You wrote,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Smaller than what? You have the raw NEF AND the JPEG at whatever quality
setting you chose. This uses the most storage space possible."
Answer:
I was thinking the camera might automatically reduce the size shooting both
at the same time. (Bad thinking!)
Recently, I have only used JPG, for WEB and a few RAW for portraits. Years
past, I used an "Olympus E20" and shot large RAW files but, I only shot one
photo at a time in one format, and don't believe it would shoot two types of
files at a one shot. I'll have to get it out and see what it can do. My
thinking was based on experience with several older digital cameras.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"what do you currently use to
process your NEFs now?"
Answer:
I usually use Photoshop, Ulead PhotoImpact, and sometimes "IrfanView" for
batch work. Processing a photo is not a problem.
So, thanks for getting me out of earlier camera mode. I'll shoot both NEF
and JPG on the D200 and store them as I usually do in an "Epson P-4000"
when the card is full.
Thanks for your remarks!
Robert
C J Campbell - 09 Jan 2007 05:39 GMT
> "The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
> various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> RAW, but also like to use .JPG for WEB pages. Maybe there is a good WEB
> site with suggestions.
NEF + JPEG means the camera stores two pictures instead of just one. It slows
how fast you can take pictures and it takes more storage space. It is a good
feature if you are shooting a bunch of news pics. You can send the JPEGs in
immediately and then, if necessary, process the ones selected from the NEF
files. It takes a lot less time to email JPEGs. Nikon originally thought that
this would be the only use, so the only JPEG you could choose was the lowest
quality one. But photographers complained (probably without really thinking
about it) so now you can choose higher quality JPEGs.
For most people you are just as well off shooting only NEF files and then
creating your own JPEGs if you need them. You get more control over picture
and file size that way.
Robert Nabors - 09 Jan 2007 07:35 GMT
>> "The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
>> various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> picture
> and file size that way.
Thanks,
Good idea! I'll try shooting only NEF files and converting them to JPEG
files
when needed.
Probably, never return to shooting JPEG's.
Bob
Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 09 Jan 2007 10:10 GMT
>Good idea! I'll try shooting only NEF files and converting them to JPEG
>files
>when needed.
>Probably, never return to shooting JPEG's.
FWIW, the NEF all ready contains a basic quality jpeg. See
http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-08/303 for example.

Signature
Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardGRuf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
Floyd L. Davidson - 09 Jan 2007 13:21 GMT
>> For most people you are just as well off shooting only NEF files and then
>> creating your own JPEGs if you need them. You get more control over
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>when needed.
>Probably, never return to shooting JPEG's.
The number of images on one CF card is much greater when you
shoot JPEG only, and so is the speed that images can be saved to
the CF card. Sometimes that is more important than other
considerations, and if so shooting JPEG only is useful.
Shoot RAW+JPEG does have a potential advantage, which is
particularly useful if you use big or slow CF cards. The JPEG
images can be quickly downloaded to a computer first, and then
you can both download the NEF files and at the same time be
previewing the JPEG files. I find this to be a great time
saver. It is particularly useful if you have someone waiting to
see how the pictures turned out. The entire shoot can be
reviewed before the NEF files are finished downloading!
As noted by others, the size of the JPEG files is so small
compared to NEF files that it does figure into the choice.
However, as far as actually using a JPEG... the NEF file already
contains a JPEG file (two of them, counting the thumbnail).
Hence if the above preview time savings is not significant for
your workflow, there isn't much point in making another JPEG
file as opposed to simply extracting one from the NEF file.

Signature
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com
Toby - 09 Jan 2007 10:09 GMT
> "The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
> various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Robert
You can shoot RAW with the possibility of three levels of jpg compression. I
usually shoot RAW plus normal. I tried shooting only RAW but found it easier
in many apps to just use the jpg as-is rather than taking the time and
effort to convert RAW to jpg. The jpgs are quite small compared to the RAW
files, so you don't lose many exposures on a relatively large card by
shooting a jpg along with the NEF.
Toby
Norm Dresner - 09 Jan 2007 15:19 GMT
| "The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
| various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
| RAW, but also like to use .JPG for WEB pages. Maybe there is a good WEB
| site with suggestions.
I have a D70 with similar options. While Raw+JPEG consumes the most
storage space, it's really cheap and readily available in large quantities
with up to 8GB cards and microdrives. I use this whenever I shoot Raw
because I review the results on at least one computer which doesn't have a
Raw viewer installed. The (basic)JPEG is also useful for web uploads but
not much of anything else.
Norm
Paul Furman - 09 Jan 2007 16:12 GMT
> "The D200 accepts CompactFlash and Microdrive, and allows you to shoot in
> various JPEG modes, in NEF (Nikon's raw file format) or with NEF+JPEG in
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> comments from users allways helps? Maybe I can get it right the first time
> with a few suggestions!!
I shoot RAW plus fine jpeg with low contrast settings. This lets me
download & sort the jpegs before wasting time downloading raw and I
usually don't use raw, just keep the best in case or if they need
adjustment due to mistakes.
JR - 10 Jan 2007 03:43 GMT
No one has hit upon one serious issue with RAW+JPG...the JPG is made
based on the camera settings, while the RAW can be easily
manipulated...I have found also that sharpness and focus issues are
drastically different....for example the in camera JPG's are not as
sharp, or seem to be more soft as in some things look out of
focus...Then I look at the NEF which is much sharper with the same
settings. This works great with custom curves to get your JPGs
perfect....This is with my D2X.
JR
Bill - 10 Jan 2007 12:43 GMT
> No one has hit upon one serious issue with RAW+JPG...the JPG is made
> based on the camera settings, while the RAW can be easily
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> settings. This works great with custom curves to get your JPGs
> perfect....This is with my D2X.
I've found the same thing with the Nikon D80 where the RAW files
retained more fine detail than the in-camera JPGs. Some reviews of the
D80 have been less than stellar because the JPG images were often from
in the camera, not converted RAW files, and image quality suffered
slightly.
When taking simple snapshots, I used to use JPG because it's quick and
easy to print off a dozen photos. But in the last few months I've become
much more accustomed to RAW conversion, so even if I don't need high
quality I shoot RAW anyway.