It happened today with a 100-400 IS lens (which is kind of interesting since
I searched a few forums and found others reporting the same lens when their
20Ds locked up). My 20D has the latest firmware (it came with it).
My symptoms were pretty much identical to what has already been reported
here ... the camera focused but the shutter would not fire.
I tried another CF, another lens, power off and back on again ... no joy. I
did notice one thing that I didn't catch in my readings of earlier posts and
that is the camera reported ERR 99 AFTER I changed lenses.
Of course, removing the battery and putting it back in fixed it and I shot a
bunch more with three lenses and no additional problems.
Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
Alan Browne - 12 Mar 2005 00:19 GMT
> Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
I'm surprised there hasn't been a firmware fix for this yet.

Signature
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
one million pics - 12 Mar 2005 07:21 GMT
> It happened today with a 100-400 IS lens (which is kind of interesting
> since I searched a few forums and found others reporting the same lens
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
Some questions before answers Charles.
Are you using a 'BG-E2 Grip' on the camera?
If so what are the first 4 digits of the serial number?
Possible answers:
The grip has a history of not contacting both batteries and when the one it
does make contact with is below 60% and you use a high load focus motor like
your lens has, goodnight time.
Another possibility is the contacts inside the battery housing of the
camera. This will affect the camera wether or not you use a grip. A chamoi
cloth with a contact cleaner solution obtainable from most electronics shops
will often fix both problems. It wouldn't hurt to give the lens and body
contacts a go over with the stuff too. It seems some early serial number
grips had quite light contact preasure in the camera and it's own battery
compartment.
I would very much like to know if the problem persists after you follow my
cleaning suggestion. 15 out of 17 fixed so far!
Charles Schuler - 12 Mar 2005 13:56 GMT
> Some questions before answers Charles.
> Are you using a 'BG-E2 Grip' on the camera?
No.
> Another possibility is the contacts inside the battery housing of the
> camera. This will affect the camera wether or not you use a grip. A chamoi
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> number grips had quite light contact preasure in the camera and it's own
> battery compartment.
> I would very much like to know if the problem persists after you follow my
> cleaning suggestion. 15 out of 17 fixed so far!
I'll let you know ... thanks!
Ken Ellis - 13 Mar 2005 08:32 GMT
>It happened today with a 100-400 IS lens (which is kind of interesting since
>I searched a few forums and found others reporting the same lens when their
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
I've had this happen at times and the fix was to turn off the
autofocus and then the shutter works. When it occurs, it is
usually some sort of low-light situation or where the object
is really far away (like the clouds). Poping the lens out
while the camera is in this canundrum seems to put it
into an error condition. I don;t know if that's helpful to you.
Works for me.
rgds
Ken
Charles Schuler - 13 Mar 2005 21:58 GMT
> Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
Happened four times yesterday. Guess it's time to call Canon.
Rob - 14 Mar 2005 01:03 GMT
>>Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
>
> Happened four times yesterday. Guess it's time to call Canon.
Have you sent off an email to Canon - has been mentioned as a firmware
glitch
Skip M - 14 Mar 2005 14:10 GMT
>>>Methinks there is a subtle but generic problem here.
>>
>> Happened four times yesterday. Guess it's time to call Canon.
>
> Have you sent off an email to Canon - has been mentioned as a firmware
> glitch
Mentioned by whom, where?

Signature
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
Douglas - 14 Mar 2005 23:38 GMT
>> Have you sent off an email to Canon - has been mentioned as a firmware
>> glitch
>
> Mentioned by whom, where?
The glitch was in the first firmware version.
That particular lens he's having trouble with has a high drain focus motor
at the best of times. If the focus gears are sticky or tight, it will cause
the problem. So too will batteries not holding their charge or being left in
the camera for a few weeks and bellow 30%.
I seriously doubt the problem is the camera. All the documented 20D problems
miss his symptoms but some of the (documented) problems with different brand
lenses fit them to a T.
Douglas
Charles Schuler - 15 Mar 2005 00:30 GMT
> The glitch was in the first firmware version.
> That particular lens he's having trouble with has a high drain focus motor
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> problems miss his symptoms but some of the (documented) problems with
> different brand lenses fit them to a T.
Thanks, Douglas. Canon wants the camera and the lens shipped to a repair
depot. Not at this time, as far as I am concerned. This is a new camera
and lens and why the heck should I pay shipping and insurance so early in
the game.
OK, I have a 300D and mounted the 100-400 IS lens and shot a card-full
today. No problems. Use any other Canon lens with the 20D, no problem. I
am not a testing laboratory, but the combination of the 20D and the 100-400
lens is a problem and others have reported the same at dpreview.com.