Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Olympus E-400 Kodak connection

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 14 Dec 2006 17:22 GMT
Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF
Pete D - 14 Dec 2006 19:54 GMT
> Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF

No connection that I can see.
John Bean - 14 Dec 2006 22:08 GMT
>> Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF
>
>No connection that I can see.

What PDF?

Signature

John Bean

RichA - 14 Dec 2006 23:33 GMT
> > Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF
>
> No connection that I can see.

My apologies, I thought it would link.  Remove the *** between
106. and the pdf

Then go to page 8.  You'll see the E-400 listed on page 8 of the Kodak
document

http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/11/115911/reports/iss1106.***pdf
Charles Schuler - 15 Dec 2006 01:31 GMT
>> > Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/11/115911/reports/iss1106.***pdf

The page cannot be found ... nice one Rich!
Jeff R. - 15 Dec 2006 03:00 GMT
>>> > Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> The page cannot be found ... nice one Rich!

You wouldn't be reading in googleg***ps, would you?
Just wondering.

--
Jeff R.
Kennedy McEwen - 15 Dec 2006 03:02 GMT
>I thought it would link.  Remove the *** between
>106. and the pdf
>
>Then go to page 8.  You'll see the E-400 listed on page 8 of the Kodak
>document

And on Page 10 you will also see them claim the Kodak 10Mp *APS* CCD
sensor goes into the Leica M8 *D-SLR*!

There are so many inconsistencies and basic errors in that document I
wouldn't trust anything in it at all.
Signature

Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
Python Philosophers         (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)

frederick - 15 Dec 2006 04:16 GMT
>> I thought it would link.  Remove the *** between
>> 106. and the pdf
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> There are so many inconsistencies and basic errors in that document I
> wouldn't trust anything in it at all.

The M8's closer to APS-C than Canon's so-called (but not by Canon?)
APS-C sensors.
Sure it isn't a dslr.  That sensor isn't something that anyone involved
in the M8 project should be gloating about anyway.
Charles Schuler - 14 Dec 2006 22:50 GMT
> Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF

And you accuse me of senility?
Helen - 14 Dec 2006 23:12 GMT
> Check page 8 of this Kodak PDF

I checked it.
Now I'm going to put polka dots on page 9 and stripes on page 10.

Today's dose of Rich, who doesn't seem to realise that this isn't a
binary group, bless his confused little heart.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.