> > You mean like how you tried to get Kodak after me for mentioning them
> > in connection with the soon-to-be discontinued Olympus E-400?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Please do not do this again.
You are right, you didn't do it. But you SURE joined in.
Guess what? I was RIGHT and you and the (now long gone loser) were
WRONG.
1. Kodak made the sensor.
2. Something went wrong.
3. Only a few thousand E-400s were made.
4. They only had enough (barely) for Europe because of this.
5. The camera is going to be replaced by Mar with a new model.
Here's some memories for you:
From: Charles Schuler - view profile
Date: Mon, Oct 16 2006 8:21 pm
Email: "Charles Schuler" <charleschu...@comcast.net>
Groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Not yet rated
Rating:
show options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
> I know that Americans believe it's a God-given right to obtain money
> via lawsuits. All I see on New York local TV are ads by shysters
> hocking lawsuit potential for everything from car accidents to drug
> trials that went bad. Somehow, I didn't realize the English could be
> as disgusting.
Given that you live across a single border, you know surprisingly
little
about your southern neighbor. I have been to Canada numerous times and
know
that you are very atypical. I really like the Canadians that I have
met and
respect them and am glad to have them as northern neighbors. (Bunches
of
them here in SW FL, by the way, but they are of course senile old
farts,
which you disdain).
You do not represent your country at all and, in fact, you do not
represent
the human race (at least the part which contributes something ...
anything).
Your recent Kodak slam (totally erroneous, by the way) should get very
interesting. Rumor has it that you might be in deep sh.t. New York
lawyers
are among the most vicious (and most skilled) in the world and Kodak
has
several on retainer to deal with issues such as you have raised. Good
luck
... you are going to need it!
Charles Schuler - 09 Dec 2006 00:16 GMT
>> > You mean like how you tried to get Kodak after me for mentioning them
>> > in connection with the soon-to-be discontinued Olympus E-400?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> You are right, you didn't do it. But you SURE joined in.
Yeah, Dr. Anderson, I jumped on your rotting carcass because it was smelling
up the newsgroup. Hey, go find a career in journalism where adolescent
emotion trumps facts. I don't like your ilk there or here.
Octogenarian indeed! I could have my left cranial hemisphere surgically
removed and still easily whip your vastly limited intellect.
In case you have not noticed, I do respond civilly to your posts that are
reasonable and will continue to do so. As for the others (sadly, most of
them), I will continue to take you to task because that is my mission.
Usenet should be a sane and respectable source of information.