Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / December 2006
Newsgroup servers
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Alan - 01 Dec 2006 16:52 GMT Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various newsgroups have been falling off.
About a year ago, I was going to switch to the fiber optic FIOS, by Verizon. One reason I did not was because Cablevision had 120,000 newsgroups and Verizon had only about 40,000.
Today, I see that Cablevision has dropped to 51,000 and I don't believe they just dropped foreign or far away local spots.
I wonder if any of you have found your newsgroups diminishing and what are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of the serve too).
J. Clarke - 01 Dec 2006 17:30 GMT > Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through > Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of > the serve too). A lot of us have given up on ISP news service and gone to a third-party provider. I use newsguy.com, a lot of folks use individual.net, which used to be free and is now cheap, some folks I know have started using free.teranews.com, which has restricted bandwidth (50 MB/day, plenty for text but not so good for binaries) but is free.
Newsguy is carrying over 43,000 newsgroups at the moment, not sure about the other two. Individual.net doesn't carry binary groups, Teranews claims to carry _all_ groups but doesn't give a number.
 Signature --John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
DoN. Nichols - 02 Dec 2006 04:00 GMT According to J. Clarke <Jclarke.usenet@cox.net>:
[ ... ]
> > I wonder if any of you have found your newsgroups diminishing and what > > are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > the other two. Individual.net doesn't carry binary groups, Teranews > claims to carry _all_ groups but doesn't give a number. Actually -- according to today's download of the active file, it is 42,359 groups.
I actually prefer running my own news server, but my previous ISP killed their news servers -- and I changed ISPs for a significant savings in connection costs. The new ISP's news server is pretty much useless at present, so I'm using newsguy, too.
Enjoy, DoN.
 Signature Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
Colin_D - 01 Dec 2006 21:01 GMT > Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through > Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of > the serve too). Most if not all ISP's have or are going to drop newsfeeds - why escapes me, as they are getting paid by subscribers who signed up when newsfeeds were part of the deal. My own ISP just up and dropped news with about a weeks warning, but no reduction in the charges, so it amounts to a reduction in service with no commensurate fee drop.
I surfed around and found teranews with their free 50MB daily, which I can live with quite well, and if somebody wants more than that you can subscribe a few dollars monthly for greater access. My news client does not tell me how many groups there are.
I think the gradual tightening up and reduction in the numbers of groups available is due at least in part to increasing pressure on pornographic, particularly child and teen porn groups, which are being closed down for fear of prosecution - witness the government in USA attempting to get access to Google and other sites for the purpose of finding people who search for illegal images.
Other groups probably just fade away for lack of posters. Of the tens of thousands of groups available, only a comparative handful are really active.
Colin D
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Alan Browne - 02 Dec 2006 23:20 GMT >> Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >> Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > me, as they are getting paid by subscribers who signed up when newsfeeds > were part of the deal. When they began offering newsgroups in the 90's there was little binary traffic and at that the files were tiny. Now many NG's have monster binaries and require a lot of BW. There are copyright issues as well (per my ISP which stopped adding NG's just before this NG came into existence ... despite it being text only).
Cheers, Alan
 Signature -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
Jeremy Nixon - 01 Dec 2006 23:46 GMT > About a year ago, I was going to switch to the fiber optic FIOS, by > Verizon. One reason I did not was because Cablevision had 120,000 > newsgroups and Verizon had only about 40,000. There aren't even 40,000 newsgroups. The rest are just bogus, misspelled, or total nonsense.
Don't be fooled by marketing nonsense. Some providers put a load of crap into their group lists just so they can cite a larger number than the other guy -- and you end up having to wade through the crap to get to the actual, active groups.
 Signature Jeremy | jeremy@exit109.com
223rem - 02 Dec 2006 20:50 GMT > > About a year ago, I was going to switch to the fiber optic FIOS, by > > Verizon. One reason I did not was because Cablevision had 120,000 > > newsgroups and Verizon had only about 40,000. > > There aren't even 40,000 newsgroups. The rest are just bogus, misspelled, > or total nonsense. Newsgroups were flourishing in the early 00s, now they're slowly but surely dying. People prefer web-based bulletin boards.
John McWilliams - 03 Dec 2006 00:22 GMT >>> About a year ago, I was going to switch to the fiber optic FIOS, by >>> Verizon. One reason I did not was because Cablevision had 120,000 [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Newsgroups were flourishing in the early 00s, now they're slowly but > surely dying. People prefer web-based bulletin boards. Some people.
 Signature john mcwilliams
We used to be troubled by multiple personalities, but we're O.K. now....
DoN. Nichols - 03 Dec 2006 04:40 GMT According to John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>:
[ ... ]
> > Newsgroups were flourishing in the early 00s, now they're slowly but > > surely dying. People prefer web-based bulletin boards. > > Some people. And some (such as I) find them terrible and excessively restrictive. I like to be able to specify my own choice of editor and associated spelling checkers -- and with a standard unix newsreader I can. All web-based fora lock you in to however they implement an editor, and you have almost no control over the format (such as when ASCII graphics are needed to convey some information).
Enjoy, DoN.
 Signature Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
l v - 04 Dec 2006 15:18 GMT > According to John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Enjoy, > DoN. I fully agree and I'd like to add that the web based are so full of visual noise (advertisements, images, flashy things, flash content, etc). I also find it hard to follow the posts in who was replying to whom.
Security is also a concern. I once posted some html into a web based knowledge sharing forum showing how to redirect the browser to a different URL. When the page loaded, the redirection html code was not displayed but actually redirect the browser to the different URL. Not good. Perhaps that has been fixed in todays modern web browsers but still ....
 Signature Len
Fred@nonono.com - 02 Dec 2006 02:39 GMT >Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of >the serve too). NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent.
I use Forte's news server, it costs only $6 a month for 20 G bytes! And it has hundreds of thousands of groups.
And they keep messages a long time... EG the oldest in this group right now is July 2005 !
Also, if you like movies and mp3s, almost all multi-part messages are intact.
The other day I clicked on a vintage movie group and it said "980,000 new messages". I clicked cancel 'cause that would take 10 minutes!
Paul J Gans - 02 Dec 2006 03:58 GMT >NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. Uh, hmmm, WRONG!
What you need is a decent ISP. There are some around.
 Signature --- Paul J. Gans
John McWilliams - 02 Dec 2006 18:28 GMT >> NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. At least this nobody uses *his* ISP for a half decent newsfeed.
> Uh, hmmm, WRONG! > > What you need is a decent ISP. There are some around. I'm not sure that makes Comcast great, but it is more decent because of this service. They offer- give- Giganews, but I've not seen a need to changeover. Giganews cuts out multiposted trolls, and I like to see everything, good, bad, and ugly.
 Signature john mcwilliams
Hoogy - 02 Dec 2006 20:44 GMT >>NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. > >Uh, hmmm, WRONG! > >What you need is a decent ISP. There are some around. I use <news.cnntp.org>. I also use my ISPs news server. I have no complaints in fact it's excellent. I always keep a free one live just in case I have to ripp the sh.t out of some utter tube.
Hoogy
John McWilliams - 03 Dec 2006 00:28 GMT >>> NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. >> Uh, hmmm, WRONG! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > complaints in fact it's excellent. I always keep a free one live just > in case I have to ripp the sh.t out of some utter tube. That sounds quite macho. How does a free offering help in this evisceration??
==
lsmft
DoN. Nichols - 03 Dec 2006 04:36 GMT According to John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>:
> >>> NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. > >> Uh, hmmm, WRONG! [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > That sounds quite macho. How does a free offering help in this > evisceration?? Presumably, it is an expendable news account, so its loss (for grossly violating the terms of service (AUP)) will be less of a hardship. :-)
Enjoy, DoN.
 Signature Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
G.T. - 02 Dec 2006 08:32 GMT >> Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >> Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. Well, I'm glad DSLExtreme includes Supernews with their regular accounts. If I had to pay I'd still go with Supernews.
Greg
 Signature "All my time I spent in heaven Revelries of dance and wine Waking to the sound of laughter Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons
Alan Browne - 02 Dec 2006 23:21 GMT > NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. I do. It carries most, but not all of the NG's I participate in.
 Signature -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
Fred@nonono.com - 04 Dec 2006 02:05 GMT >> NOBODY uses their ISP news anymore, they subscribe to an independent. > >I do. It carries most, but not all of the NG's I participate in. Videotron? I guess you don't download multimedia!
They have exactly zero complete multi-part messages.
Every week I download a vintage movie of some kind - impossible on Videotron.
l v - 02 Dec 2006 04:48 GMT > Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through > Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of > the serve too). My ISP dropped their newsgroup server about a year ago. I think I was the only one using it. I now subscribe to supernews. Of the 29,000+ groups, I only look at 4 groups so number of groups was irrelevant to me. I was more concerned about quality of service from my provider. I kept receiving the same post multiple times from the first provider I tried - they were unable to fix the problem. Since then I've switched to supernews with no problems. For me I worry about quality not quantity. Who has time to read 51,000 news groups? ... unless you are into spamming.
 Signature Len
jeremy - 02 Dec 2006 16:06 GMT You might check out
nntp.aioe.org
A free news server. If all you want to do is READ, it may meet your needs. They do have a posting limit--I believe it is 25 posts per day.
You can't argue with the price, though.
>> Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >> Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Who has time to read 51,000 news groups? ... unless you are into > spamming. l v - 02 Dec 2006 16:55 GMT > You might check out > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >> Who has time to read 51,000 news groups? ... unless you are into >> spamming. I tried them, and I did not have much good luck with them. The server was down more than it was up. I used readfreenews.net for free read only.
 Signature Len
Alan - 04 Dec 2006 17:19 GMT There really are so many uses for Newsroups for information. The kind of work I do takes me into so many different areas of specialty and it's nice to be able to interact with a live person who knows, rather than just hunting through Google for information. So for me, quantity is important. There are still questions I asked about various professions in the early 90s that still appear in the archives.
I believe the Newsgroups started in the 80s, not the 90s as someone said. The Newsgroups were the internet, along with ftp sites. I remember when it started, at least for me and the people I knew on the old chat systems, and people were getting a kick out of getting into debates on all different topics. The first site that I used Newsgroups on was one in California called Portal.
>> Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >> Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >quantity. Who has time to read 51,000 news groups? ... unless you are >into spamming. DoN. Nichols - 05 Dec 2006 02:17 GMT According to Alan <alancalan@excite.com>:
> There really are so many uses for Newsroups for information. The kind > of work I do takes me into so many different areas of specialty and [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I believe the Newsgroups started in the 80s, not the 90s as someone > said. The Newsgroups were the internet, along with ftp sites. Actually -- usenet newsgroups started before the internet. News articles were shuffled from server to server via uucp (Unix-to-Unix-Copy) via automatic modem dialups and transfers. I was getting newsfeeds in that way back when "The Internet" was ARPAnet, and was restricted to government sites, government contractors, and educational sites.
When the internet started to become accessible to others than just that restricted set of sites, usenet added the ability to transfer between servers via that medium too (using the NNTP protocol). And shortly afterward added "NNRP" for newsreading directly through the net.
Google finally managed to get their archive to go back to the beginning (from archived copies which long predated the internet), so you can go back that far if you so desire.
Enjoy, DoN.
 Signature Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
223rem - 02 Dec 2006 19:31 GMT AFAIK, google groups carries all newsgroups, and it is free too.
Alan Browne - 02 Dec 2006 23:22 GMT > AFAIK, google groups carries all newsgroups, and it is free too. Horrible user interface however.
 Signature -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
Alan Browne - 02 Dec 2006 23:17 GMT > Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through > Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of > the serve too). Videotron (Cable, 2, 5 and 20 Mbit/sec options) just stopped adding new ones as of a couple years ago (including this one). So they keep servicing older ones that inlclude binaries (phots, video, music, etc.) but they refuse to add text only NG's such as this one. (So I log onto this one via a foreign ISP).
There are commercial NG services for a few $ / month such as Newsguy, Giganews and so on.
Cheers, Alan
 Signature -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
Savageduck - 03 Dec 2006 05:05 GMT > Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through > Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of > the serve too). I have found ISPs restrict Newsgroup functionality. As a Mac user I find a dedicated newsgroup provider such as Powerusenet (powerusenet .com) or panic.com (a Supernews reseller) together with what I believe is the best newsgroup client for the Mac, Unison by Panic is the best solution for me. I have Charter Cable out here in California and have also been a long time Earthlink user and find that neither of these can give what a dedicated Usenet/Newsgroup server can. I also have to agree with other posters, that quantity does not always provide a satisfying experience. Finding the groups I enjoy participating with is more than enough for me. There is not enough time in the day to sort out all the crap.
vinnie_b - 05 Dec 2006 23:36 GMT On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:52:44 -0500, Alan said...
>Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of >the serve too). Saw Newsguy mentioned a few times and for what it's worth I've also used them for many years. I get newsgroups, email and webspace through them for about $3 month and haven't had any significant problems.
Newsgroup counts can be deceptive and you'll find that dedicated newsgroup providers & ISP news servers will vary on that point. 120,000 and 40,000 may look like a big gap but when you take a look at the additional groups most of them are fake, empty or spam dumps so there isn't much use for them.
Most providers take care with the newsgroups they add to their sites and if they miss something you can usually request it and they'll add it.
For me there are more important considerations when hooking up with a provider such as completeness of their feed, propagation and cost to name a few. ISP news servers are notoriously unreliable unless they're outsourcing to a premium newsgroup service so you're usually better off going with a dedicated provider in the long run.
vin
nascar20fan@nascar.com - 17 Dec 2006 05:07 GMT >Being on Long Island, many of us gain Internet access through >Cablevisions Optimum Online. I've been noticing that various [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >are the total newsgroups your server/provider offers (and the name of >the serve too). I use Giganews and would highly racommend them. I have loaded text post as far back as 2003 on them, and if you are into binaries they have something ike a 45 day retention. I have used them for years, and have never been anything but happy with them.
I have also used Supernews, and was happy with them as well. But went with Giganews do to the longer retention rate.
|
|
|