>> >> > According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter
>> >> > mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>Came from Nikon at Photokina. I don't know if they issued a press
>release but think about it;
Were you at Photokina? Did YOU speak to someone at Nikon about this?
If the answer to either of these questions is 'No,' then please
identify your source.
A press release would be nice. Especially one that confirms your claim
that Nikon has modified the D80 by moving the moire filter.
>> I have a hard time believing that test-firing the D80 is a new
>> manufacturing step for Nikon. I would think that is and has always
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>It's tough to afford this kind QC step when the camera sells for under
>$1000.00.
Nonsense. Besides, if there is any truth to your post, Nikon is doing
it now.
>> I also have a hard time believing that Nikon is using drilled and
>> machined polycarbonate for its camera bodies when it would be much
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>The static is only generated in the fabrication, not in the use.
I was talking about static generated during manufacture.
>Except for the sensor, that is.
What?
>I think Nikon has a good point. Mass-produces products like that are
>bound to have "tailings" in them. It's tough to get rid of it all, and
>expensive.
>-Rich
Now you're just making up stuff. Large, attached tailings would/should
be removed in the molding process, and an ultrasonic cleaner should be
able to remove any lose material still clinging to the part.
Or are you saying that Nikon's manufacturing process is lax?
TR
Brion K. Lienhart - 28 Nov 2006 07:19 GMT
>>>>>>According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter
>>>>>>mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
> Or are you saying that Nikon's manufacturing process is lax?
This just in...
Generalissimo Francisco Franco: Still Dead.
RichA: Still an Idiot.
RichA - 28 Nov 2006 18:01 GMT
> This just in...
> Generalissimo Francisco Franco: Still Dead.
> RichA: Still an Idiot.
Why raise you head out of the sand for that?
RichA - 28 Nov 2006 18:00 GMT
> >> >> > According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter
> >> >> > mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> If the answer to either of these questions is 'No,' then please
> identify your source.
A British photo mag report on Photokina. They had statements from all
major mfgs on the state of their business, plans, etc.
> A press release would be nice. Especially one that confirms your claim
> that Nikon has modified the D80 by moving the moire filter.
I haven't seen a press release. They probably wouldn't do one for such
an "esoteric" change in design. More megapixels is what drives press
releases.
> >> I have a hard time believing that test-firing the D80 is a new
> >> manufacturing step for Nikon. I would think that is and has always
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Nonsense. Besides, if there is any truth to your post, Nikon is doing
> it now.
So pulling a body of a production line to test and clean it is
costless? In what mass manufacturing environment is that the case?
> >> I also have a hard time believing that Nikon is using drilled and
> >> machined polycarbonate for its camera bodies when it would be much
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> What?
Reason they moved the moire filter, the sensor generates static when it
is working.
> >I think Nikon has a good point. Mass-produces products like that are
> >bound to have "tailings" in them. It's tough to get rid of it all, and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Or are you saying that Nikon's manufacturing process is lax?
I've seen residual debris and dust in $100,000 machined aluminum
aerospace products, it's not major reflection on QC unless it directly
impacts the function of the product.
> TR