Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Nikon 17 -55 2.8 DX Lens

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Monty - 16 Nov 2006 22:04 GMT
Hi All,

Thinking of getting the above lens, seems to have good reviews. I know
it's expensive - bottom line is it worth it? will be used on my D 200.
Haven't got a decent dealer in my area so I can't try before I buy.

Regards to all

Pete.
Bruce - 16 Nov 2006 22:42 GMT
I've just bought the 18-70mm Nikon & it's so usefull it has become my main
lens.

Bruce
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Pete.
Paul Furman - 16 Nov 2006 23:03 GMT
> Hi All,
>
> Thinking of getting the above lens, seems to have good reviews. I know
> it's expensive - bottom line is it worth it? will be used on my D 200.
> Haven't got a decent dealer in my area so I can't try before I buy.

What other lens(es) do you have? What are you planning to use it for?
There is (some) distortion if doing architecture. It seems like the
17-35/2.8 is better (though less zoom) but nearly the same price, used
if budget is really tight. That's supposed to be a really spectacular
performer. If you want it as a replacement walkaround lens, the wider
zoom range is more handy for that but it's not much smaller or lighter.
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 16 Nov 2006 23:24 GMT
> Thinking of getting the above lens, seems to have good reviews. I know
> it's expensive - bottom line is it worth it? will be used on my D 200.
> Haven't got a decent dealer in my area so I can't try before I buy.

The 17-55mm is an average lens.  Get the 17-35 and 28-70 f/2.8 and you will
be happy.

Rita
Adrian Boliston - 16 Nov 2006 23:30 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Regards to all

I got this lens 3 weeks ago and like it a lot, and at GBP 794 it's not
cheap!  It was an upgrade for my 18-70 which I got as a kit lens with my
D70s and it's nice to have the extra 1-2 stops and I also like the fact that
the max f stop does not change with focal length.   It's a solid mass of
metal & glass and the only plastic you will find on it will be the hood &
caps!   If you ever decide you don't like it then these beasts seems to
resell on ebay for practically what you pay new.

Cheers Adrian www.boliston.co.uk
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.