J. Clarke skrev:
> >> Considering less than half of all Americans even bother to vote
> >> perhaps you credit them with more smarts than they deserve.
> Why vote for an idiot?
You've missed the essence of democracy. It's not about getting the best
guy possible. Enlightened despotism is much better at that - at the
risk, of course, of getting a really non-enlightened despot from time
to time. No, democracy is about safety - predictably getting the least
bad out of the people who actually have bothered to stand. (Or run, on
your side of the pond.)
There may well only be idiots standing for a particular office at a
given election. But it is highly unlikely that they all are equally
useless from a given voter's viewpoint.
Jan Böhme
J. Clarke - 09 Nov 2006 19:06 GMT
J. Clarke skrev:
> > Pete D wrote:
> >> Considering less than half of all Americans even bother to vote
> >> perhaps you credit them with more smarts than they deserve.
> Why vote for an idiot?
You've missed the essence of democracy. It's not about getting the best
guy possible. Enlightened despotism is much better at that - at the
risk, of course, of getting a really non-enlightened despot from time
to time. No, democracy is about safety - predictably getting the least
bad out of the people who actually have bothered to stand. (Or run, on
your side of the pond.)
There may well only be idiots standing for a particular office at a
given election. But it is highly unlikely that they all are equally
useless from a given voter's viewpoint.
Well, actually they are, which is why most Americans don't vote. You throw
one set of scoundrels out and the next set doesn't fix anything, just leaves
all the old mistakes in place and adds a new set.