> While it may not be ideally what you're after, the corded remote (which I
> bought not long ago) has the added functionality of being able to lock
> open the shutter, maybe something to consider if you needed that..
>
> E.
It also allows you to stand _behind_ the camera when shooting, a not
insignificant point in many situations!
G.T. - 08 Nov 2006 19:49 GMT
>> While it may not be ideally what you're after, the corded remote (which I
>> bought not long ago) has the added functionality of being able to lock
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It also allows you to stand _behind_ the camera when shooting, a not
> insignificant point in many situations!
I can stand behind the camera with the wireless RC-1, too. My hand only
needs to be to the side of the camera.
Greg

Signature
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons
> While it may not be ideally what you're after, the corded remote (which I
> bought not long ago) has the added functionality of being able to lock open
> the shutter, maybe something to consider if you needed that..
I have the Canon RC-1 infrared remote for my Digital Rebel (300D). It
also locks open the shutter. If you have the camera in bulb mode, then
when you press the button on the remote, the shutter opens, and it
remains open until you push the remote button a second time. In other
words, you don't have to hold down the button during the exposure -
it's one press to open the shutter and another to close.
During "normal" operation (i.e. not bulb mode), the remote can trigger
the camera's shutter either immediately or after a two-second delay.
I recently bought a cheap wired remote, and now use that more often
than the wireless one, but I still use both. Last time I used the
wireless remote it was giving me a lot of trouble (it seemed to only
have a range of a couple meters) but I suspect that either the
batteries are dying, or (more likely) the fluorescent lighting in the
building was interfering with the IR transmission.
Before I had the wired remote, I often used the wireless one with the
camera on the tripod by simply reaching around and pointing the remote
back at the camera from the front. A little awkward, but not very. I
like the wired remote better for that, though; it's more convenient,
and has a two-stage focus/shutter button. (I'm using the cheap Adidt
wired remote that you can always find on Ebay. It's worked great so
far.)
- Darryl
EvilNem - 08 Nov 2006 20:59 GMT
>> While it may not be ideally what you're after, the corded remote (which I
>> bought not long ago) has the added functionality of being able to lock
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> - Darryl
I suggested it mainly because I was going to get the wireless remote before
the corded, then got snared into star trail photography, obviously I was
mis-informed by the store clerk who said only the corded remote could be
used for long exposure times (ie. greater than 20min) when the RC-1 would
have worked just as well, and without the added hazard of getting the cord
caught on anything when releasing the shutter lock.