> Sheldon <sheldon@XXXXXXXXsopris.net> wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, this is the older model, ...
It is indeed, the 300D (DR), and not the new 350D (DR XT).
Unlike other Canon DSLR intros of late, Canon did NOT
disco the 300D when the 350D was intro'd.
This means that Canon intends that the 300D remain the
entry-level of their DSLR line.
> ... and while still a great camera the price has been
> reduced quite a bit already.
Yes, but it's interesting that Costco felt it necessary
to create a "bundle" in order to arrive at an appealing
price. My guess is that Canon wouldn't allow them to
simply drop the retail price of the stand-alone basic kit
below some co-marketing agreement/kickback guideline level.
Which is not to say that a spare BP511 is gratuitous.
It's a very sensible thing to buy with a new 300D.
> I would assume you will be finding all kinds of deals
> at a lot of places for this particular model.
Since the body-only is even cheaper, I'd expect the
usual suspects to be offering all sorts of low-ball
bundles, including some with 3rd-party EF lenses,
3rd-party batts, misc CF cards, etc. Caveat emptor.
> Great deal for somebody looking for a dslr,
> especially if you already have some lenses that fit.
18 months ago, someone mused approximately "I suppose in
10 years I'll kick myself for buying a 300D", to which I
responded, "No, you'll only kick yourself for having
spent $1000 for it. It will remain a very useful camera."
I would not be at all surprised if the typical street
price of the 300D kit hits US$500 or less before the
cam is discontinued.

Signature
Regards, Bob Niland mailto:name@ispname.tld
http://www.access-one.com/rjn email4rjn AT yahoo DOT com
NOT speaking for any employer, client or Internet Service Provider.