Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Canon Rebel

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kevin Backous - 04 Mar 2005 00:53 GMT
This past weekend I purchased a Digital Rebel, and for the most part I am
very pleased especially on Price.

There are a couple of things that I have a question on however;

1.  When I am downloading to the computer, it seems to be very slow compared
to the other digital cameras that I have, of which 1 is a 5MP with "not that
much" smaller file size.  I have a 1MB professional Lexar 80X CF card in the
rebel.  I am guessing that on average it takes 8 or so seconds per pic to
download, which doesn't sound like much, but if you have 100 pics or more it
is a substantial amount of time.  Has anyone had a similar experience.  On
my Kodak 5MP camera, the 5MP pics scream in at less than a second.

2.  I have other lenses from previous Canon Film Cameras that I was hoping
to use.  One in particular is a Tamron 28-200.  It mounts fine, and seems to
function correctly (auto focus etc.), however when I take pics that look in
focus in the viewfinder (w/ or w/o using autofocus) they are all ever so
slightly out of focus?  Very frustrating, any thoughts?

Thanks~
David H. Lipman - 04 Mar 2005 01:15 GMT
| This past weekend I purchased a Digital Rebel, and for the most part I am
| very pleased especially on Price.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
|
| Thanks~

To answer Q1:

Get a USB v2.0 CF Card Reader.  Then you will be able to save battery power and get the max.
speed of the CF card when copying files from the card.

BTW:  I think you mean a 1GB Lexar 80x CF card  ;-)

Signature

Dave

Kevin Backous - 10 Mar 2005 23:30 GMT
Follow up...

I went out and purchased a USB V2.0 card reader and this took care of the
download problem.  It is VERY fast now, much better.

Kevin
> | This past weekend I purchased a Digital Rebel, and for the most part I
> am
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> BTW:  I think you mean a 1GB Lexar 80x CF card  ;-)
David H. Lipman - 10 Mar 2005 23:47 GMT
From: "Kevin Backous" <kevin.backous@bestco-inc.com>

| Follow up...
|
| I went out and purchased a USB V2.0 card reader and this took care of the
| download problem.  It is VERY fast now, much better.
|
| Kevin

COOL !

I was dismayed to find out that when I get the new SanDisk Extreme III CF cards (133x) I
will have to get new USB v2.0 readers as well. According to SanDisk, the SDDR-91 that I have
will not read them at full speed and the SDDR-86 that I have won't work with the Extreme III
at all !

Signature

Dave

Tumbleweed - 04 Mar 2005 09:29 GMT
> This past weekend I purchased a Digital Rebel, and for the most part I am
> very pleased especially on Price.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> look in focus in the viewfinder (w/ or w/o using autofocus) they are all
> ever so slightly out of focus?  Very frustrating, any thoughts?

Without further details, my first guess would be camera shake.
The shutter speed is stored with the image so you can easily check and see.
Charles Schuler - 05 Mar 2005 22:57 GMT
> 2.  I have other lenses from previous Canon Film Cameras that I was hoping
> to use.  One in particular is a Tamron 28-200.  It mounts fine, and seems
> to function correctly (auto focus etc.), however when I take pics that
> look in focus in the viewfinder (w/ or w/o using autofocus) they are all
> ever so slightly out of focus?  Very frustrating, any thoughts?

I think point 1 has already been answered.  Your point 2 is more
complicated.  This camera has a fairly aggressive anti-alias filter and thus
does not produce "tack-sharp" shots.  A little sharpening in post-processing
is what most folks use.  However, it could be your Tamron lens.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.