Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Handholding the 500mm f/4 Nikkor for that perfect shot!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 12 Oct 2006 02:32 GMT
No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your hands
around it!  And to think some people need IS at 17mm.

http://static.flickr.com/26/66759796_b68fb2603e_o.jpg

Rita
Paul Furman - 12 Oct 2006 02:46 GMT
> No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your
> hands
> around it!  And to think some people need IS at 17mm.
>
> http://static.flickr.com/26/66759796_b68fb2603e_o.jpg

LOL!
Alan Browne - 12 Oct 2006 03:46 GMT
> No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your
> hands
> around it!  And to think some people need IS at 17mm.
>
> http://static.flickr.com/26/66759796_b68fb2603e_o.jpg

Note the "beanbag" nearby and the collar upside down...
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 12 Oct 2006 10:00 GMT
>> No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your
>> hands
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Note the "beanbag" nearby and the collar upside down...

Except the "beanbag" as you call it is the cloth lens cover.
Signature

Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html

Charles Schuler - 12 Oct 2006 21:51 GMT
> Except the "beanbag" as you call it is the cloth lens cover.

It is a bean bag.
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 13 Oct 2006 01:04 GMT
>> Except the "beanbag" as you call it is the cloth lens cover.
>
>It is a bean bag.
Guess that's what I get for giving a really quick look before my eyes have
fully opened first thing in the morning. Now pulling foot out of
mouth......

Signature

Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html

G.T. - 13 Oct 2006 00:10 GMT
> >> No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your
> >> hands
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Except the "beanbag" as you call it is the cloth lens cover.

Looks like a beanbag to me with a nice depression in it where the lens was
resting, or someone else's lens was resting.

Greg
Alan Browne - 13 Oct 2006 01:48 GMT
Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) wrote:

> Except the "beanbag" as you call it is the cloth lens cover.

Nope.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Bill Crocker - 12 Oct 2006 13:00 GMT
> No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your
> hands
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Rita

I think I have lens envy!

Bill Crocker
Tien - 12 Oct 2006 16:33 GMT
> I think I have lens envy!

He he.  Mine is a 600 mm.

I have babe envy though.  Cute.  Is that you Rita?

Tien
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 12 Oct 2006 22:06 GMT
> I have babe envy though.  Cute.  Is that you Rita?

Nope, I'm blonde.

Rita
Floyd L. Davidson - 12 Oct 2006 23:04 GMT
>> I have babe envy though.  Cute.  Is that you Rita?
>
>Nope, I'm blonde.

That was obvious.

Signature

Floyd L. Davidson            <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)                         floyd@apaflo.com

Paul Furman - 12 Oct 2006 16:16 GMT
> No VR/IS on this one lads.  It's all in the form and how you wrap your
> hands
> around it!  And to think some people need IS at 17mm.
>
> http://static.flickr.com/26/66759796_b68fb2603e_o.jpg

Here's her comments:
http://flickr.com/photos/bocavermelha/66759796/
*lol
There are so many questions here and I’ don’t know from where I should
start! HaHaHa…
So I will resume as short as possible.
I’m 1mt72 (5’643”) tall – not that short…
Lens weight : 3.447 kg (7.6lbs) plus camera weight: 1lb 5 oz (600g)
Lens length : 16inch 339 (41.5 cm) without hood
Hood length : 8 inch 268 (21cm)
I can hand-hold this equipment for 10 clicks (of course using the AF mode)
I carry this camera & lens with Lowepro Lens Trekker 600 AW Backpack
Travel carrying (airplanes) with a Samsonite Rolling Case
lolols okay…sunglasses - adidas evil eye pro l (customer made)
polycarbonate polarized lenses- enhance and sharpen objects and to
saturate natural colour rendition. this is achieved by screening out
direct light and eliminating polarised light from your surroundings,
thus allowing your eyes to dilate and view objects and colours more
richly and clearly without being dark. perfect optical clarity,
light-weight, scratch/impact-resistant, 100% UV protection. lololols
Thanks everyone and have a wonderful day!!!

Signature

Paul Furman
http://www.edgehill.net/1
Bay Natives
http://www.baynatives.com

Philip Homburg - 12 Oct 2006 16:56 GMT
>Lens weight : 3.447 kg (7.6lbs) plus camera weight: 1lb 5 oz (600g)

A 300/2.8 plus a TC-14 and a D1 is also about 4 kg (but 420mm instead of 500).
With a bit of practice it is no big deal.

But I have to admit that putting it on a monopod makes for a much more
relaxed experience.

Signature

That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it
could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done
by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make.
    -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency

Rita Ä Berkowitz - 12 Oct 2006 22:06 GMT
> A 300/2.8 plus a TC-14 and a D1 is also about 4 kg (but 420mm instead
> of 500). With a bit of practice it is no big deal.

You got it!  The way some people in here talk you would think that's it's
not possible to get great results handholding the long ones.  If a frail
little thing like that can do it there's no reason some of these pussies
can't handhold a 17mm on an FF sensor Canon 5D.

> But I have to admit that putting it on a monopod makes for a much more
> relaxed experience.

Yep, that or the good old beanbag or cinderblock.

Rita
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.