Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Canon 20D Sensor Cleaning - Comments Please

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joey - 09 Oct 2006 23:23 GMT
Hi All,

After reading everywhere I could find about information on cleaning the
CCD sensor I decided to order what I read was the best kit.  It
consisted of the Sensor Swabs and Eclipse Optic Cleaning solution.  The
instructions said to place a couple of drops on the end of the swab and
run the swab over the sensor with firm pressure, turn the swab 180
degrees and rub back the other way.

After doing this once I discovered that I had two new spots in a
different place.  I took a pic focused way in against the blue sky and
the spots were visible on the camera viewer especially when I zoomed in.
 I then opened another swab since it said not to use one twice and
repeated the procedure.  Still a few spots in new places.

I decided to do what was not recommended and took an almost empty can of
compressed air for optic purposes and blew a few short bursts across the
sensor.  I practiced a few times first just to make sure no freon spray
would come out.  I also didn't use the thin plastic tube attached to the
can, just the can only.  I then checked using the same test and the dust
spots were all gone.  I pulled the CF card and downloaded the image to
my computer to look in more detail.  The spots were all indeed gone and
I used my 20D this weekend with no problems.

So, my purpose for this posting is to get others opinions on cleaning
the sensor where you had excellent results since I followed most of what
I read and didn't get good results.  What sucessful methods have you
used on your sensor?  Thanks

Joey
Paul Furman - 10 Oct 2006 00:43 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> compressed air for optic purposes and blew a few short bursts across the
> sensor.

I'm surprised that worked after swabbing, and that suggests it might
have been enough without swabbing. I know that if there's a bunch of
dust swabbing just pushes it back & forth, so I got a sensor brush
(static charged with canned air) after wasting a bunch of swabs.
Eventually some gets glued on but most will come off with a brush. I
just got a dime-store makeup brush, it works!

> I practiced a few times first just to make sure no freon spray
> would come out.  I also didn't use the thin plastic tube attached to the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Joey

Signature

Paul Furman
http://www.edgehill.net/1
Bay Natives
http://www.baynatives.com

Edward Velez - 10 Oct 2006 01:51 GMT
I normally take an out of focus shot 1st to get an idea where the
major dust spots are. Then I go ahead and blow it with a rocket.  
Take a couple more shots and then if I need to take the eclipse and
swab. 1 swipe in each direction using both sides of the swab (dont
want to use the dirty side to go back over the sensor protecter).  
Take a couple more shots and see if I got everything.  Remember that
the sensor shows things 180 degrees oppposite of where you would
expect to see the specs. If you see them on the left, then the dust
is on the right side of the sensor.

10/9/2006 8:36:46 PM
Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
<i8BWg.14489$7I1.9868@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>

> > Hi All,
> >
> > After reading everywhere I could find about information on cleaning the
> > CCD sensor I decided to order what I read was the best kit.  It
> > consisted of the Sensor Swabs and Eclipse Optic Cleaning solution.
 The
> > instructions said to place a couple of drops on the end of the swab and
> > run the swab over the sensor with firm pressure, turn the swab 180
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> >
> > Joey
Charles Schuler - 10 Oct 2006 00:49 GMT
Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a Rocket
Blower.

I have several DSLRs and so far have only cleaned the sensors with air.
Works for me.
Joey - 10 Oct 2006 05:11 GMT
> Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a Rocket
> Blower.
>
> I have several DSLRs and so far have only cleaned the sensors with air.
> Works for me.

Charles,

Looks like I might have wasted some money with the swabs since air looks
like the best choice for cleaning.  I'm just wondering why there has not
been an honest discussion here about the best way to clean the sensor
which apparently is with air?

Joey
John McWilliams - 10 Oct 2006 05:40 GMT
>> Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a Rocket
>> Blower.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> been an honest discussion here about the best way to clean the sensor
> which apparently is with air?

As to "honest discussion" here re this tedious subject, there has been
tons over the last six months. There's not exactly a consensus, and
among the honest opinions, there'd be some that are flat out wrong, some
that are facetious, and a few that are far out.

Signature

john mcwilliams

Frank ess - 10 Oct 2006 06:10 GMT
>>> Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a
>>> Rocket Blower.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> among the honest opinions, there'd be some that are flat out wrong,
> some that are facetious, and a few that are far out.

At's right Mr McWms.

Joey, the best way to clean the sensor is with prophylaxis: what you
don't got, you don't got to cure; howsomeever, if we want to fulfill
the expectations of our dSLR bodies, we gots to change lenses. That
means the body cavity is exposed to pernicious influences. A shot of
air on the outside of the camera-lens interface prior to exposure, and
careful dodgery of airborne partickles may be of benefit.

Most of the stuff floating around won't stick to your sensor. Air will
knock it off. A rocket blast with the opening faced to enjoy the
effect of gravity as an aid may be all that is ever necessary. As soon
as something gets stuck, you're in risky territory. Proceed with
measured force: if unstaticky brushes fail, then it may be necessary
to whip out the big guns: fluids and swabs.

Me? I got 'em all, but in three-and-a-half camera-years of sometimes
undisciplined use and lens-swapping, the prophy and dislodge Rocket
blast are all that have been necessary.

It's a _dry_ heat.

Signature

Frank ess
Left Coast, down low

Charles Schuler - 10 Oct 2006 21:57 GMT
>> Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a Rocket
>> Blower.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> been an honest discussion here about the best way to clean the sensor
> which apparently is with air?

Some dust motes apparently adhere to the surface (based on posts that I have
read).  I have not experienced that yet.  I purchased an artist's brush that
I intend to use if I run across this problem.  I am reticent to swab my
sensors.
Paul J Gans - 12 Oct 2006 04:36 GMT
>> Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a Rocket
>> Blower.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>Charles,

>Looks like I might have wasted some money with the swabs since air looks
>like the best choice for cleaning.  I'm just wondering why there has not
>been an honest discussion here about the best way to clean the sensor
>which apparently is with air?

It has an interesting history.  I believe that Canon (and
possibly Nikon) has always recommended an air blower.

But we camera fiends always know better, so folks decided
that swabbing was better -- probably because that is how
we clean lens surfaces.

so for quite a while swabbing was king.

But the high price of swab kits started folks thinking again
about air blowers.  So now the pendulum is swinging to
air blowers.

My advice, worth what you paid for it, is to start with an
air blower.  I doubt it will do any harm and if it fixes
things, great.  You can always go to swabs later.

Just be careful about compressed air, canned or from a tank.

    ---- Paul J. Gans
Bart van der Wolf - 12 Oct 2006 15:57 GMT
SNIP
>>Looks like I might have wasted some money with the swabs since
>>air looks like the best choice for cleaning.  I'm just wondering why
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> It has an interesting history.  I believe that Canon (and
> possibly Nikon) has always recommended an air blower.

See <http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0610/tech-tips.html> last
topic, for a comment from Chuck Westfall.

Signature

Bart

Joey - 12 Oct 2006 17:49 GMT
> SNIP
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> See <http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0610/tech-tips.html> last
> topic, for a comment from Chuck Westfall.

Thanks Bart, this was a very useful site.

Joey
Paul J Gans - 14 Oct 2006 05:51 GMT
>SNIP
>>>Looks like I might have wasted some money with the swabs since
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> It has an interesting history.  I believe that Canon (and
>> possibly Nikon) has always recommended an air blower.

>See <http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0610/tech-tips.html> last
>topic, for a comment from Chuck Westfall.

The sites he recommends all seem to go with the equivalent
of pec pads and solvents...

  ---- Paul J. Gans
Phil Wheeler - 14 Oct 2006 13:17 GMT
>> SNIP
>>>> Looks like I might have wasted some money with the swabs since
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> The sites he recommends all seem to go with the equivalent
> of pec pads and solvents...

I use the Visible Dust products on my 20D.  Works
good.  Uses air but only on the brush, not into
the camera.

Phil
Bart van der Wolf - 15 Oct 2006 00:02 GMT
SNIP
>>> See <http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0610/tech-tips.html>
>>> last topic, for a comment from Chuck Westfall.
>>
>> The sites he recommends all seem to go with the equivalent
>> of pec pads and solvents...

And Sensor brushes.

> I use the Visible Dust products on my 20D.  Works good.  Uses air
> but only on the brush, not into the camera.

Having read many reports on the subject, I decided to get brushes and
the Copperhill swipe, even before my first DSLR arrived several years
ago.

The Visible Dust brushes get most of the dust with minimal pressure on
the AA-filter assembly. The more sticky/fused kind of debris needs
slightly more friction/pressure and 2 drops of solvent, after which
the brushes are great again for intermediate interventions.

Signature

Bart

Craig M - 10 Oct 2006 11:53 GMT
OK, the ear syringe I figured out, what is the Rocket Blower ????

> Always try blowing FIRST ... with a clean, dry ear syringe or a Rocket
> Blower.
>
> I have several DSLRs and so far have only cleaned the sensors with air.
> Works for me.
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 10 Oct 2006 12:00 GMT
> OK, the ear syringe I figured out, what is the Rocket Blower ????

http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2006/sensor.htm

Rita
Celcius - 10 Oct 2006 12:42 GMT
> OK, the ear syringe I figured out, what is the Rocket Blower ????
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > I have several DSLRs and so far have only cleaned the sensors with air.
> > Works for me.

Rita is kidding... of course.
It's more like this "Giotto":
http://www.2filter.com/prices/products/rocket.html

I'm told there is one with a filter. I haven't seen it yet.
Marcel
Alan Browne - 10 Oct 2006 19:01 GMT
> So, my purpose for this posting is to get others opinions on cleaning
> the sensor where you had excellent results since I followed most of what
> I read and didn't get good results.  What sucessful methods have you
> used on your sensor?  Thanks

So far I just use a blower bulb with the straw from a can of compressed
air to direct the pressure at small areas.  I hold the camera up with
the lens opening down (in the hope that more dust will fall out than
fall in).

It usually takes 3 - 4 tries to get all the dust.  If I'm down to 1 or 2
small dust motes (in oof test images at f/22) then I let it be 'til next
time.

I've built a device using a tupperware pot with a hole for the lensmount
of the camera in the lid and a plastic tube from outside the pot poking
through into the pot and up into the camera.  I attach a vacuum to the
pot.  This evacuates the pot and causes air to be drawn into the tube
and directs a blast at the sensor.  Dust comes out of the camera, falls
into the pot and gets drawn into the vaccum.  Extra holes in the pot act
to reduce the pressure differential.  I haven't tested it on the camera
yet, just on a "mockup" (a glass with some debris in it).  Works very
well.  Anyone got an obsolete DSLR to donate for testing?  (I really
don't want to screw up my one DSLR during tests).

I will also replace the plastic tubing with copper in order to be sure
that I'm not directing static charged air at the sensor.

Cheers,
Alan

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.