>>>>> Any opinions as to whether to upgrade to the 400 or not. Or is there
>>>>> anything better out there for the same value.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> 20D is a very nice camera, lot to like about it.
> >>>>> Any opinions as to whether to upgrade to the 400 or not. Or is there
> >>>>> anything better out there for the same value.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> at the end i've had to choose between 400 and 30---but holding them
> both...and decision fell.
Yeah, the specs of the Digital Rebels are impressive until you actually
see and hold the cameras. They have lousy build quality and ergonomics.
Now the 30D is beautiful ...
Protoncek (ex.SleeperMan) - 09 Oct 2006 18:56 GMT
>> >>>>> Any opinions as to whether to upgrade to the 400 or not. Or is
>> >>>>> there
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> see and hold the cameras. They have lousy build quality and ergonomics.
> Now the 30D is beautiful ...
well, from specs, even 350 and 400 are quite decent. It's just...as you
said...build quality, small, like holding my old S2 in my hands...so, no
thanks.
30 is still a beauty in all regards, as you say.