 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / March 2005Image quality of sigma SD10
Hello, Just bought a sigma SD10 recently, feel really happy when captur images under sunlihgt. However, if use it after sun set, the quality i really poor, especially the color balance and high light area. Is there any SD10 owners can give thier advice? Thank you +------------------------------------------------------------------- |Filename: 01B.JPG |Download: http://www.photobanter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=188 +------------------------------------------------------------------- -- love2me > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Is there any SD10 owners can give thier advice? Can you get your money back? Read this http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmasd10/page19.asp Foveon is a good tecnology when you work under studio light. > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Thank you. "Milena" <milena@libero.it> wrote in news:MHLUd.602239$b5.27534223 @news3.tin.it: > Foveon is a good tecnology when you work under studio light. Why is it a good technology under studio light? /Roland Because , at moment, in poor light the foveon work bad... but under controlled light the photos take with foveon are artifact free and clean. Read the bayer vs foven technology. > "Milena" <milena@libero.it> wrote in news:MHLUd.602239$b5.27534223 > @news3.tin.it: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > /Roland > Read the bayer vs foven technology. I've read it plenty; the Foveon stuff is all propaganda.  SignatureBill > Because , at moment, in poor light the foveon work bad... but under > controlled light the photos take with foveon are artifact free and clean. > Read the bayer vs foven technology. But it's still 3.42MP. "Milena" <milena@libero.it> wrote in news:WPNUd.602904$b5.27564016 @news3.tin.it: > Because , at moment, in poor light the foveon work bad... but under > controlled light the photos take with foveon are artifact free and clean. References to proof of this claim I think is needed. I have never seen anything that hints at this. > Read the bayer vs foven technology I know both technologies rather well. I know their strong and weak parts. /Roland >Foveon is a good tecnology when you work under studio light. If you can get your lighting to emulate the filtering that Foveon recommends and Sigma doesn't do, you might get better color discrimination. Signature<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm> ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< > Hello, > > Just bought a sigma SD10 recently We can all be forgiven some of our mistakes. You will find little love of the Sigma in this NG; it's simply a bad camera. There are no two ways about it. You should head over to "http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1027" where someone might be able to advise you. How wonderful it is that your first post to Usenet is regarding a Sigma camera. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.