re: Helen, the mag that said PS noise reduction was poor

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

RichA - 26 Sep 2006 17:39 GMT

Sorry, Google's posting to this group is not allowing replies.
You wrote:

Helen - view profile
Date: Mon, Sep 25 2006 4:12 pm
Shouldn't the "PS. Crap" appear after your signature?
Do we ever get to know the name of the magazine you so happily quote,
or is
it some magazine which exists only in your mind?

That magazine was Photography Monthly, Sept issue.
Bibble good.
DXO good.
Noise Ninja good.
PS useless.

Reply to this Message

John McWilliams - 26 Sep 2006 21:12 GMT

> Sorry, Google's posting to this group is not allowing replies.

What happened with Forte Agent? How come you use Google at all for NG
replies?

Signature

john mcwilliams

Reply to this Message

RichA - 26 Sep 2006 23:48 GMT

>> Sorry, Google's posting to this group is not allowing replies.
>
>What happened with Forte Agent? How come you use Google at all for NG
>replies?

My provider stopped "providing" support for usenet. I guess they
needed the server space for advertising.

Reply to this Message

John McWilliams - 27 Sep 2006 00:34 GMT

>>> Sorry, Google's posting to this group is not allowing replies.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> My provider stopped "providing" support for usenet. I guess they
> needed the server space for advertising.

Bummer.

Reply to this Message

Bart van der Wolf - 27 Sep 2006 01:19 GMT

SNIP

>> My provider stopped "providing" support for usenet. I guess they
>> needed the server space for advertising.
>
> Bummer.

Bummer indeed.
Time to look for a different provider, 'vote' with your money, it
works.

Signature

Bart

Reply to this Message