Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Magazine review of noise control systems

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 25 Sep 2006 03:32 GMT
PS.  Crap
Noise Ninja.  Excellent
Bibble. Excellent
Steve Cutchen - 25 Sep 2006 04:33 GMT
> PS.  Crap
> Noise Ninja.  Excellent
> Bibble. Excellent

I use the Ninja to reduce noise from indoor sports shots that I shoot
at a hacked ISO 3200 on my 300D.  Calibrated it specifically to ISO
3200 on my camera.  It's outstanding.
Bart van der Wolf - 25 Sep 2006 12:39 GMT
> PS.  Crap
> Noise Ninja.  Excellent
> Bibble. Excellent

Care to reveal which magazine?
Any comment on their testing method?
Why didn't they include NeatImage, and or several others, or did they?
Did they mention that Bibble uses an API from NoiseNinja?
Did you ever stop and wonder why do your posts create more questions
about the posts than information? Sad!

Signature

Bart

RichA - 25 Sep 2006 22:42 GMT
>> PS.  Crap
>> Noise Ninja.  Excellent
>> Bibble. Excellent
>
>Care to reveal which magazine?

If you insist.
>Any comment on their testing method?

If you'd like.  The reason I mentioned it in the first place was that
I had read another source that said the PS method was excellent.

>Why didn't they include NeatImage, and or several others, or did they?

NeatImage doesn't get much press.  At least I haven't seen much.

>Did they mention that Bibble uses an API from NoiseNinja?

Didn't see that.
>Did you ever stop and wonder why do your posts create more questions
>about the posts than information? Sad!

But then what are the chances that if I posted verbatim everything the
magazine said, the usual group wouldn't just scream and rant that it
was rubbish, probably because they use PS and the review hurt their
itty-bitty feelings?
Helen - 25 Sep 2006 21:12 GMT
> PS.  Crap
> Noise Ninja.  Excellent
> Bibble. Excellent

Shouldn't the "PS. Crap" appear after your signature?
Do we ever get to know the name of the magazine you so happily quote, or is
it some magazine which exists only in your mind?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.