Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why people upgrade

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sheldon - 17 Sep 2006 20:14 GMT
I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a D200.
One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it because the
buffer holds more RAW images.

She has plenty of excellent 16x20's hanging all over the house, taken with
the D100, so this business of getting a new DSLR every time the pixel count
goes up is kind of ridiculous.  As a matter of fact, she had just received
the camera and didn't even know what the megapixel count was on the 200.

I'll hang onto my D70 until Nikon comes out with something I just can't live
without, or maybe when the price on the D200 drops.  It does have a nice
"feel" to it.

Sheldon
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 17 Sep 2006 20:23 GMT
>I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a D200.
>One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it because the
>buffer holds more RAW images.

So what's the problem? She obviously made the decision this was important
to her style/type of shooting.  It's her $$.

>I'll hang onto my D70 until Nikon comes out with something I just can't live
>without, or maybe when the price on the D200 drops.

The way you should. she obviously felt different, as did I upgrading from
my D70 to a D200.

So what's the big deal?
--
Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
Sheldon - 18 Sep 2006 05:42 GMT
I'm just trying to make the point that unless there is a good reason for
upgrading, chasing megapixels isn't always a good reason to upgrade.  My
friend obviously made a good decision, but for sound reasons that have to do
with her type of shooting.

>>I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a D200.
>>One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it because the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
> http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
Mark² - 17 Sep 2006 22:06 GMT
> I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a
> D200. One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it
> because the buffer holds more RAW images.

Can you think of times where a larger RAW buffer might be critically
important?
If your buffer fills at the wrong moment...or too quickly, it's very easy to
be stuck with a camera that CANNOT grab a critical image in an action
series.
-Very frustrating.

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

DoN. Nichols - 18 Sep 2006 02:03 GMT
According to Sheldon <sheldon@XXXXXXXXsopris.net>:
> I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a D200.
> One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it because the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> goes up is kind of ridiculous.  As a matter of fact, she had just received
> the camera and didn't even know what the megapixel count was on the 200.

    When *I* upgrade to the D200 (unless something more tempting
comes along first), it will be for other features than the extra MP.  I
often don't use all of the MP of which my D70 is capable -- unless I am
expecting the images to be something important, I often will not shoot
in RAW.

    But the D200 will meter with my older AI lenses, and the D200
will not.

    And the viewfinder is brighter, larger and quicker to frame in
the D200 than in the D70.

    Those will be *my* primary reasons for the upgrade, and I would
be quite happy if the D200 had a switch to limit the MP to those of the
D70.  (It probably does -- if I stick with JPEG mode.)

> I'll hang onto my D70 until Nikon comes out with something I just can't live
> without, or maybe when the price on the D200 drops.  It does have a nice
> "feel" to it.

    While the D200 offers some features which *I* feel that I need,
though a lower price would be appreciated -- especially after having my
wife in the hospital for nearly three weeks.  (She is home now, thank
goodness.)

    Enjoy,
        DoN.

Signature

Email:   <dnichols@d-and-d.com>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
          --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Roger - 18 Sep 2006 06:56 GMT
>I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a D200.
>One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it because the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>goes up is kind of ridiculous.  As a matter of fact, she had just received
>the camera and didn't even know what the megapixel count was on the 200.

For me the buffer is important with action photography and rapid fire
shots.

>I'll hang onto my D70 until Nikon comes out with something I just can't live
>without, or maybe when the price on the D200 drops.  It does have a nice
>"feel" to it.

I have the D70, but I may pick up a D80 as it has the physical remote
cable attachment which is important to me. For most of the shooting I
do the D70 has plenty of pixels.

>Sheldon

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
tomm42 - 18 Sep 2006 14:10 GMT
> I was just over a friends who recently upgraded her Nikon D100 to a D200.
> One would assume it was for more megapixels, but she did it because the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Sheldon

There is more of a difference between the D70 and D200 than megapixels.
First let's consider megapixels 10mp gives you 8x12 x 300ppi. Not
extrapolation for 8x10s, that is nice.
Otherwise the viewfinder of the D200 is much clearer than the D70,
pentaprism, vs a mirror based viewfinder + some magnification (which
makes it better than the D100). Also N80 based cameras have notoriously
inaccurate viewfinders, the D200s is much more accurate, where you
place a subject is where it will be in the image. I do a lot of copy
work & macro and this is important.
The buffer has been discussed.
The flash commander in the D200 handles more than one flash unit, that
is nice especially with the R1 flash.
Weather sealed magnesium body, some think it is too heavy I like it.
Ability to use AI and AIS lenses, and a viewfinder you can focus with.
I came into a D70 after using the D200. Doing macro work at 1:1 mag the
viewfinder difference is remarkable.

Tom
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.