Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Nikkor 18-200mm VR problem?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rudy Benner - 11 Sep 2006 16:13 GMT
My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens points
downward. Has anyone else seen this problem? Is there a fix?

r.
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 11 Sep 2006 18:11 GMT
> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying
> the camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the
> lens points downward. Has anyone else seen this problem? Is there a
> fix?

It's a known problem that pretty much afflicts most of the 18-200s.  The
best thing is to not worry about it.  You can send it back to Nikon Repair
for a temporary repair or wrap a rubber band around it if it really bothers
you.

Rita
Rudy Benner - 11 Sep 2006 20:44 GMT
>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying
>> the camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Rita

Temporary repair? I do not much like the sound of that at all. I guess that
means I will just learn to live with it.
DoN. Nichols - 12 Sep 2006 00:22 GMT
According to Rita Ä Berkowitz  <ritaberk2O04 @aol.com>:

> > My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying
> > the camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> for a temporary repair or wrap a rubber band around it if it really bothers
> you.

    I've not handled the 18-200 yet, so I don't know whether it has
this feature, but my 35-135 has a marco mode which requires the lens
zoom collar to be pulled all the way back, a button depressed on the
collar, and the collar then rotated to select the focal distance (no AF
in macro mode on this lens).  Anyway -- I've taken to leaving this set
into macro mode, as it inhibits the zoom slide, so the lens stays in its
most compact position.  

    If there is a similar mode on yours, you can use it the same
way.  It does slow down that first shot when you raise the camera to
your eye, but otherwise, is no problem.  I'm doing this in part to keep
the lens from breathing too much and sucking in dust.  most of my other
lenses don't have this problem -- but this one is the most comfortable
zoom range for me currently.  (If I'm going to be doing a lot of
walking, I am more likely to switch to the 18-70mm kit lens, or to the
28-105mm which also has a very nice macro mode.

    Enjoy,
        DoN.

Signature

Email:   <dnichols@d-and-d.com>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
          --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Geoff - 13 Sep 2006 08:11 GMT
>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying
>> the camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Nikon Repair for a temporary repair or wrap a rubber band around it
> if it really bothers you.

Repair ?  Isn't it just what they do - nothing to repair !

geoff
RG - 11 Sep 2006 21:53 GMT
> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
> camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens
> points downward. Has anyone else seen this problem? Is there a fix?

If you zoom the lens all the way in to its shortest focal length, it is
supposed to lock into position and not be subject to gravity-induced zoom
creep.  At any other focal length it will be subject to gravity-induced zoom
creep.
Rudy Benner - 11 Sep 2006 22:00 GMT
>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
>> camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> creep.  At any other focal length it will be subject to gravity-induced
> zoom creep.

Nope, it eventually manages to creep away from the shortest focal length
position.
RG - 11 Sep 2006 22:04 GMT
>>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
>>> camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Nope, it eventually manages to creep away from the shortest focal length
> position.

Then it is operating outside of specifications.  It would seem a repair or
exchange are the only solutions left.
Rudy Benner - 12 Sep 2006 01:16 GMT
>>>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying
>>>> the camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Then it is operating outside of specifications.  It would seem a repair or
> exchange are the only solutions left.

Just had a closer look, the camera will stay in the 18 mm setting, like you
describe, I can only conclude that in carrying the camera behind me on the
shoulder strap, the barrel of the zoom must be rubbing my coat. Once the
setting is disturbed, it will move due to gravity as described.

I do not have a solution.
Frank ess - 12 Sep 2006 03:26 GMT
>>>>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am
>>>>> carrying the camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> gravity as described.
> I do not have a solution.

Mr Canon thought that was a significant problem in at least on
instance: he added a switch that will keep the 70-300 IS DO lens at
its short end unless released.

Signature

Frank ess

Don Wiss - 12 Sep 2006 00:21 GMT
>My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
>camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens points
>downward. Has anyone else seen this problem? Is there a fix?

Yes, mine has this problem. When I called Nikon a couple months ago the
fellow claimed they weren't aware of this problem, but that I could send it
in and they would look at it.

At the shortest focal length mine stays in. Also if really humid the
problem goes away, and conversely, when drier it is worse.

I do plan to send mine in. I just haven't decided when.

Don <www.donwiss.com/pictures/> (e-mail link at page bottoms).
Bill - 12 Sep 2006 09:51 GMT
>My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
>camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens points
>downward. Has anyone else seen this problem? Is there a fix?

Yes.

Don't let the camera point down.

:-)
Rudy Benner - 12 Sep 2006 13:00 GMT
>>My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
>>camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> :-)

I have a disobedient camera, I keep telling it not to do so but its center
of gravity says otherwise. Damned physics anyway.

When I take over the planet, I will decree that gravity will be compliant to
my will. Not only that, I will have a new coin stuck with both of my faces,
one on the front and one on the back.

I will have a guillotine in every town, all the lawyers, politicians and
clergy will be rounded up and beheaded. Parasites, all of them.
Proconsul - 13 Sep 2006 06:41 GMT
>>> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
>>> camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens points
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I will have a guillotine in every town, all the lawyers, politicians
> and clergy will be rounded up and beheaded. Parasites, all of them.

I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
fascinating.....:)

I own and use one of the 18-200 lenses and mine doesn't "point down"
when I carry the camera using the strap around my neck. It points
forward - and gravity works here pretty much the same way it does
everywhere else.

That being the case, the second to last poster had it right - don't
point the camera down. "Non-problem" solved....

PC
Rudy Benner - 13 Sep 2006 07:07 GMT
> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> PC

Short of taking a picture of the camera and the 18-200mm VR lens attached,
suspended from the strap, I do not know of a way to convince you that indeed
the lens points downward. Eventually, the lens will creep out to the full
zoom position when I am out for a walk with the camera. Try it, grab the
strap, hold it out in front of you and see for yourself.

Its not a NON PROBLEM for me, perhaps in your universe, gravity works
differently.
Rudy Benner - 13 Sep 2006 07:18 GMT
>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Its not a NON PROBLEM for me, perhaps in your universe, gravity works
> differently.

Just to make sure we are on the same page, my camera body is the D-50.
Even with the 18-70mm kit lens, the lens points downward.
Proconsul - 14 Sep 2006 05:47 GMT
>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Just to make sure we are on the same page, my camera body is the D-50.
> Even with the 18-70mm kit lens, the lens points downward.

I've used both of those lenses a D70s - which is pretty much like the
D50 - and with a D200....IMO, which of the Nikon SLRs you're using is
irrelevant.....

I realize you are stubborn, but the lens doesn't point down unless YOU
point it down - carry it around your neck and it will quite happily
face forward......

PC
Rudy Benner - 14 Sep 2006 11:00 GMT
>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> PC

Stubborn? No, not stubborn, just stating facts. Of course, beliefs are
stronger than facts for you.

Ok, have a look here ....
www.rudybenner.com/album/smartass/d_50_points_down.pdf

Now tell me the camera does not point down, blockhead.
Joan - 14 Sep 2006 14:03 GMT
That's exactly what mine does when let hang.  If it's hanging from my
neck it still points down but not quite as much.

Signature

Joan
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly

: Stubborn? No, not stubborn, just stating facts. Of course, beliefs are
: stronger than facts for you.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
:
: Now tell me the camera does not point down, blockhead.
Proconsul - 14 Sep 2006 17:28 GMT
>>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Now tell me the camera does not point down, blockhead.

I wondered how long it would take for you to start "name calling" - the
proof you've no argument....

Your picture is both silly and stupid. Wear the camera around your neck
and it points forward, NOT "down". Even you photo shows about a 45
degree angle, NOT "down".

I tried mine again - strap around neck, camera rests on chest - points
forward. The only way you can make it point down is to manually force
it down....

Quit while you're behind...or find something valid to complain about.....

PC
Rudy Benner - 14 Sep 2006 18:16 GMT
>>>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> PC

Would you not call "silly and stupid" name calling? How about "stubborn"?

r.
Rudy Benner - 14 Sep 2006 18:52 GMT
>>>>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
> r.

The measured angles are 62 degrees with the 18-200mm VR lens, 48 degrees
with the 18-70mm kit lens and 22 degrees with just the camera body.
Proconsul - 15 Sep 2006 00:19 GMT
>>>>>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>>>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> degrees with the 18-70mm kit lens and 22 degrees with just the camera
> body.

Ain't gonna give up are you?....:)

Hang it around your neck and measure again......:)

PC
Proconsul - 15 Sep 2006 00:18 GMT
>>>>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
> r.

"Stubborn" isn't a name - words mean things.....

"Silly" and "stupid" referred to your photos which show you holding the
camera in your hands.....

I still suggest you wear it around your neck and it will NOT point
down...mine still points straight forward even with the lens extended
all the way out, i.e., 200mm......

You are still beating a dead horse and "stubbornly" insisting that what
isn't so is indeed so....! Reminds me of another intellectual giant who
queried the world as to what the real meaning of "is" is.....:)

Surely there is a real problem you can put forward for discussion - maybe?

PC
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 15 Sep 2006 01:49 GMT
>Surely there is a real problem you can put forward for discussion - maybe?

Yes, will all parties please trim quoted material.
--
Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
tomorrow@erols.com - 14 Sep 2006 23:57 GMT
> >>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
> >>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> point it down - carry it around your neck and it will quite happily
> face forward......

It's very interesting that you know how someone else's camera hangs
from its strap when you've never seen them or their camera strap.

FYI, my Nikon D70s with the 18-200mm VR lens attached, when hanging
from my neck on the camera strap supplied by Nikon with the camera,
hangs DEE OH DOUBLE YOU IN.

Not that I'm stubborn, that's just the way it is.

Your gravity loses 2-1.
Proconsul - 15 Sep 2006 00:21 GMT
>>>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Your gravity loses 2-1.

I'll stick with my gravity - the gravity that exists in the real world......

My 18-200 VR mounted on a D70s rests happily on my chest when hanging
from the strap and points straight FORWARD....:)

PC
Joan - 15 Sep 2006 02:43 GMT
Maybe for you, but for me, I couldn't have the strap so short that the
camera would rest on my "chest". Whatever would that look like in
front of my melons?  I have the camera strap at a length so that the
camera is about waist level or lower and the lens points below
horizontal.

However, I don't let the camera just hang, normally I cradle it in my
left arm, this way both the camera and lens are supported and if the
SB800 is also attached, it's supported as well to reduce stress on the
connections.

Signature

Joan
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly

: I'll stick with my gravity - the gravity that exists in the real world......
:
: My 18-200 VR mounted on a D70s rests happily on my chest when hanging
: from the strap and points straight FORWARD....:)
:
: PC
Rudy Benner - 15 Sep 2006 01:48 GMT
>> >>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>> >>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> Your gravity loses 2-1.

Beliefs are stronger than facts. In spite of images supporting my
statements, he remains convinced he is right. There is only one solution,
the killfile.
Doug Payne - 15 Sep 2006 13:41 GMT
Points up, points down, who gives a sh*t?. Why you're at it, why not
measure the size too?
Joan - 13 Sep 2006 08:07 GMT
Mine (D50+18-200) points down at about 45 degrees when hanging around
my neck, and further down if just held out freely.  The lens easily
pulls out when set to 24mm but is rather firm when set at 18mm.

Signature

Joan
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly

: Short of taking a picture of the camera and the 18-200mm VR lens attached,
: suspended from the strap, I do not know of a way to convince you that indeed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
: Its not a NON PROBLEM for me, perhaps in your universe, gravity works
: differently.
Proconsul - 14 Sep 2006 05:45 GMT
>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Its not a NON PROBLEM for me, perhaps in your universe, gravity works
> differently.

Nonsense - nothing to "convince"....doesn't happen.....maybe my lens is
"special", somehow, but it doesn't move unless I move it......

And, remember, I said I carry the camera using the strap around my neck
- which is the way it was intended to be carried.....:)

PC
Rudy Benner - 14 Sep 2006 11:26 GMT
>>> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
>>> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> PC

Stubborn? No, not stubborn, just stating facts. Of course, beliefs are
stronger than facts for you.

Ok, you made me do it, have a look here ....
www.rudybenner.com/album/smartass/d_50_points_down.pdf

Now tell me the camera does not point down, blockhead.

{that is a piece of 1000 MCM single conductor high voltage cable behind the
camera in the third shot, we all need to make a living}
Craig M - 14 Sep 2006 12:01 GMT
when used to use film slr, my cannon AE-1 with the vivitar 75-205 mm zoom
lens on the camera, with a strap arround my neck it would point down just
due to the lens being heavier then the camera body, and when the straps
attatch to the camera, the lens that came with it, a 50 mm, would not turn
down, would point ahead, it was a matter of weight and balance points, dont
recall if it would move or not while pointing at the ground, dont recall
having a prob with it though.

> >> I find this overly detailed discussion of a "non-problem" to be most
> >> fascinating.....:)
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> PC
cjcampbell - 18 Sep 2006 03:22 GMT
> >My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
> >camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens points
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> :-)

Personally, I like a long camera strap slung across my chest so that
the camera rests on my hip below the waist. I can't stand Nikon's short
straps. So I use PacSafe's camera strap, which also gives me some
protection from camera snatchers who cut straps. The long strap also
makes the camera much less conspicuous and keeps me from constantly
looking like a tourist. Quite honestly, people who carry their cameras
on their chests might as well wear flower print Bermuda shorts and long
black socks.

I like the camera to have as small a profile as possible. The 18-200mm
VR does not point down when it is set to 18mm, but it does if set any
longer -- which is fine with me; the darned thing gets banged around
plenty as it is without sticking out another several inches. I have
lost or broken several lens hoods that way.
cjcampbell - 15 Sep 2006 01:32 GMT
> My new 18-200mm sometimes will zoom out to 200 mm when I am carrying the
> camera on a walk, then camera center of gravity is such that the lens points
> downward. Has anyone else seen this problem? Is there a fix?

The ones that don't do this have owners who complain that the zoom is
too stiff. I take it you have had the lens for awhile and it has
loosened up a little.

At least the lens points downward when it does this. Otherwise people
would think you are way too happy to see them. Plus, this lens tends to
get banged on everything and everybody anyway.

My own problem with this lens is that I keep knocking the lens hood off
or breaking it. It is a real problem with the fantastically narrow
passageways and extremely crowded streets of the Philippines.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.