Multiply your mm X 1.5 for the D70.

Personally, I would buy the two fixed lenses if the price were right.
They should perform very well in low light situations where you don't
want to use a flash or tripod.

-------------------

Or you could by my D70s which will have a 24-120mm VR for $700.00. I also
want to get rid of my 80-400mm VR so I can get me a 300mm 2.8 VR for my
D200.

Ilaab

The two prime lenses are excellent lenses, the 18-70 is considered as
the best bang for the buck in the Nikon lens line up. The 70-300 is a
so-so lens, if you think of it as a 70-200 you'll be fine. If the prime
lenses are autofocus they would match nicely with the D70. If they are
older AIS or AI lenses they will work but not meter with the camera.
The 18-70 would be a good walk around lens. The 35 and 85 are two of
Nikon's best lenses. If the price is right and the primes are AF lenses
I'd try to get all 4. The 35 on a digital camera has the image angle of
a 52mm on a 35 and the 85 an image angle of a 125mm lens on a 35. The
range below the 35mm is very nice to have as is the range above 85.
Just think you'd be set for lenses, for a long time.

Tom

I'm not personally familiar with any of these, just based on research
I've done...

I don't think there is a 35mm f/1.2 nikkor, the 34/1.4 is likey an older
model that won't meter & might not even mount without modifications,
certainly not autofocus. But if modified, that would be a neat lens to
use, helpful in low light and somewhat sharper/better than the 18-70 kit
lens. The 18-70 is pretty good though so not a huge difference besides
the low light ability. The 35 will translate as a bit longer than a 50mm
standard normal view so that's nice to have. It's hard to manual focus
on a D70 though. Still would be an interesting & useful thing to have
for low light or large prints of landscapes with exceptional detail.

The 85mm f/1.8 is pretty good for the price but translates (1.5x) as a
field of view of a 128mm medium telephoto lens which is sort of maybe
not that useful. What sort of shooting do you like to do? This would
make nice portraits at a long distance or catch details of street scenes
(across the street) at night or hummingbirds at close range or flower
'closeups' in shady woods.

The AF ED 70-300mm f/4-5.6 D is so-so if you don't plan to get anything
else & aren't too picky it's a cheap second everything-kit with the
18-70 though the 70-210 f/4-5.6 or 80-200 f/2.8 are better and you don't
really need 300mm with the 1.5x factor on digital. If you did need 300
it's probably for sports or wildlife and then you need a faster lens
anyways, this will only look really sharp stopped way down on a tripod
for non-moving subjects in broad daylight.