> Forgive me for such a newbie-ish question, but...
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> there's less and less features in a $5000 camera that's not found in a
> $1000 camera.
>> Forgive me for such a newbie-ish question, but...
>>
>> Are 1.x crop cameras here to stay, or will it be obsolete within a
>> decade (ie by 2015)?
No one can say with certainty, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't a
market for those, and lenses for same. (such as Canon E series)
>> I'm getting the distinct impression that the camera manufacturers
>> greatly prefer to keep full-frame cameras strictly in the domain of
>> professionals, while the crop lenses for the consumer level.
Untrue, even now, with Canon's 5D. Under $3 grand, aimed at high end
consumer and backup for Pro's.
This
>> would be ideal for the manufacturers --- price wars at the consumer
>> level would not affect the exorbitant over-pricing at the professional
>> level. There's a clear boundary.
Conspiracy, huh??
>> If the manufacturers were to make full-frame cameras readily available
>> to the average consumer, then that boundary between amateur and
>> professional would inevitably fade. Afterall, with each passing year,
>> there's less and less features in a $5000 camera that's not found in a
>> $1000 camera.
But the price of the gear isn't what distinguishes Pro's from amateurs,
nor good photography from mediocre.
> You will be waiting many years to see a FF below $1000. Crops are here
> to stay.
Just how many, Rich? Care to wager it'll happen within 5 years from now,
precisely 12:12:49 PM on Monday, August 28, 2006?

Signature
John McWilliams
RichA - 29 Aug 2006 00:34 GMT
> >> Forgive me for such a newbie-ish question, but...
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> Just how many, Rich? Care to wager it'll happen within 5 years from now,
> precisely 12:12:49 PM on Monday, August 28, 2006?
The only attribution you quoted correctly was the last line. Have some
coffee.
John McWilliams - 29 Aug 2006 07:08 GMT
> The only attribution you quoted correctly was the last line. Have some
> coffee.
I know you cannot properly format a response, unless it less than two
lines long, and now you show you can't even 'cept out attributions.
Have a nice day.

Signature
lsmft
RichA - 29 Aug 2006 23:35 GMT
> > The only attribution you quoted correctly was the last line. Have some
> > coffee.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Have a nice day.
What a dope.