Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sony takes market share from Canon...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
frederick - 25 Aug 2006 00:49 GMT
Only one month (but obviously there's only one month's data anyway!)
Seems Canon has taken a far bigger hit from Sony than Nikon in the
Japanese market.  The 400d launch price is apparently $US50 less than
the current 350d price.  Margins are the first casualty of true
competition. This is very good news for consumers.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=a1tNArNUlcUU
C J Southern - 25 Aug 2006 06:25 GMT
> Margins are the first casualty of true
> competition. This is very good news for consumers.

Unless of course margins drop to the point where they can no longer afford
to invest needed amounts in R & D - in which case it's not so good news for
consumers.
frederick - 25 Aug 2006 07:04 GMT
>> Margins are the first casualty of true
>> competition. This is very good news for consumers.
>
> Unless of course margins drop to the point where they can no longer afford
> to invest needed amounts in R & D - in which case it's not so good news for
> consumers.

While Canon, Nikon, Sony, Asahi Pentax remain substantially or entirely
Japanese owned and managed, I suspect R&D expenditure would be about the
last thing they cut.
Luke Bosman - 25 Aug 2006 07:21 GMT
> Only one month (but obviously there's only one month's data anyway!)
> Seems Canon has taken a far bigger hit from Sony than Nikon in the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=a1tNArNUlcUU

There have been months of pent-up demand for an Alpha mount camera.
Without seeing how many SLRs are actually being sold, it would be wrong
to infer too much from a comparison of market share over just one whole
month.

I am surprised to see Olympus so far behind the competition. Their
cameras seemed quite competitive to me.

Cheers,
Luke

Signature

Lincoln City 0-2 Southend United (AET)
Swansea City 2-2 Southend United
We went up twice with Tilly and Brush

Pete D - 25 Aug 2006 09:40 GMT
Yes, it would include preordered and advance sales, etc.

>> Only one month (but obviously there's only one month's data anyway!)
>> Seems Canon has taken a far bigger hit from Sony than Nikon in the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Cheers,
> Luke
sierra - 25 Aug 2006 13:39 GMT
What manufacturer of batteries does Sony cameras use - or shouldn't we
ask?
Pete D - 25 Aug 2006 22:08 GMT
> What manufacturer of batteries does Sony cameras use - or shouldn't we
> ask?

No idea but it is a worry, glad my Pentax uses AA,s and my Sony V1 has a
tiny little battery that couldn't blow your nose if it exploded. ;-)
John McWilliams - 25 Aug 2006 16:21 GMT
>> Only one month (but obviously there's only one month's data anyway!)
>> Seems Canon has taken a far bigger hit from Sony than Nikon in the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> to infer too much from a comparison of market share over just one whole
> month.

Bingo.

I think the releases from Canon will benefit all users, as did the Nikon
offerings a while back. I don't think we can say margins are crumbling
based on pricing; manufacturing prices could well be lower, and R+D on
most components amortized.

Signature

John McWilliams

frederick - 25 Aug 2006 23:30 GMT
>>> Only one month (but obviously there's only one month's data anyway!)
>>> Seems Canon has taken a far bigger hit from Sony than Nikon in the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> based on pricing; manufacturing prices could well be lower, and R+D on
> most components amortized.

Data on market share week by week over a couple of months is here:
http://tinyurl.com/z988x
Sure - initial high "pent up" demand for the a100 skews results - ending
in the a 100 at about 12% and falling.
But the comments from BCN may also indicate that the market may be
maturing, this poorly translated text seems to indicate that sales
volume overall isn't increasing. (or didn't increase when Sony appeared)
"It is found in other words, SONY “ate” that 2 strongly, especially
CANON share rather. In addition, PENTAX with “PENTAX K100D” July 14%,
has almost expanded share to time from June 7.6%, CANON and Nikon are
the appearance which is taken share even to this. At the beginning, user
layer of the digital single-lens reflex camera spread with the SONY and
Matsushita entry, also enlargement of the market itself was expected,
but looks at such if “it fights and” movement, it seems that “the pie
enlargement” effect has not been produced yet, bears the intensification
of more competition."
TW - 26 Aug 2006 15:41 GMT
Olympus made a big mistake in changing lens mount and abandoning existing
format. Two key changes at the same time in a highly competitive market
contribute the current situation.

>> Only one month (but obviously there's only one month's data anyway!)
>> Seems Canon has taken a far bigger hit from Sony than Nikon in the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Cheers,
> Luke
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.