> The picture was the stagged only because it was felt by others that in
> the original picture the U.S., flag that was used was too small, taken
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> "ALL gave some. Some gave ALL."
Right on. Neither is the picture an attempt to deceive anyone. Yes, it
is a staged re-enactment of an event that happened a little earlier
(and he took pictures of the actual event, too), but that does not make
the picture dishonest, unrealistic, or wrong. This photographer thought
his message was so important that he had to pay attention to every
detail and get it right. He was always truthful, as far as I know,
about how the picture was taken. And while we could wish he kept better
records as to who was at the original flag-raising and how he set
everything up, I don't suppose that any of us could have done any
better, under fire, in the heat of battle.
Jay Beckman - 24 Aug 2006 06:09 GMT
> Right on. Neither is the picture an attempt to deceive anyone. Yes, it
> is a staged re-enactment of an event that happened a little earlier
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> everything up, I don't suppose that any of us could have done any
> better, under fire, in the heat of battle.
CJ,
IIRC, there was a show on TV a couple of years ago where they took the
Iwo Jima photo and through modern photograpic forensics were able to ID
most if not all of the flag raisers.
I'm pretty sure that they had confirmed that three of the Marines died
within the next week during ongoing combat ops on the island.
Jay B
cjcampbell - 24 Aug 2006 06:22 GMT
> > Right on. Neither is the picture an attempt to deceive anyone. Yes, it
> > is a staged re-enactment of an event that happened a little earlier
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I'm pretty sure that they had confirmed that three of the Marines died
> within the next week during ongoing combat ops on the island.
I would like to have seen that.
Kevin Agard - 24 Aug 2006 10:00 GMT
The by Rosenthal photo was not "staged."
"Staging" a photo is generally defined as a set-up for the sake of the
photo itself. Rosenthal had noting to do with the changing the flag. The
commander of the Marine battalion that took the mountain reportedly
decided that the the 4.5 foot flag originally raised was too small to be
seen from the landing beaches and ordered that it be replaced by a
larger, 8' flag. The raising of that 8' flag is the scene Rosenthal caught.
Therefore, as the reasons for the change had nothing to do with a "photo
op" and Rosenthal had nothing to do with the decision, one can not
reasonably call it "staged."
And Rosenthal did not shoot the initial flag raising. He wasn't even on
the mountain at the time of the initial raising. In fact, in later
interviews Rosenthal stated that he almost didn't go up the mountain
after learning that the flag had already been raised.
The photos of the initial raising of the "small" flag were captured by a
USMC sergeant named Lou Lowery, a photographer for Leatherneck. Sgt
Lowery, unfortunately, was KIA later in the campaign.
KMA
> Right on. Neither is the picture an attempt to deceive anyone. Yes, it
> is a staged re-enactment of an event that happened a little earlier
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> everything up, I don't suppose that any of us could have done any
> better, under fire, in the heat of battle.