Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Amateur seeking advice

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fran - 20 Aug 2006 16:24 GMT
Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
place to start. I'm a beginner planning to buy an SLR camera in the
next few weeks as I'm going to Canada in September - some of the most
beautiful scenery on the planet. I'd like some advice about the best
camera for someone who hasn't handled an SLR in almost 20 years and
wants to go digital (of course), so any info would be gratefully
received, about cameras suitable for someone nervous at the prospect
but keen to give it a go.  Thanks alot.
Bill - 20 Aug 2006 16:41 GMT
>Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
>place to start.

You're in the right place.

> I'm a beginner planning to buy an SLR camera in the
>next few weeks as I'm going to Canada in September - some of the most
>beautiful scenery on the planet. I'd like some advice about the best
>camera for someone who hasn't handled an SLR in almost 20 years and

What brand camera did you use before? It might be easier if you see
about a model from the same company, if possible. There will be a
familiarity with the same brand.

If you don't have any reasons for specific models, I suggest you visit a
camera shop and take a look at the Nikon D50 and Canon Rebel XT. Handle
them both and see if you have a preference.

If you have a budget, that helps to define models and lense choices too.
And also what you intend to shoot, aside from the obvious vacation
shots.
DoN. Nichols - 21 Aug 2006 01:14 GMT
According to Bill  <bill@c.a>:

> >Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
> >place to start.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> And also what you intend to shoot, aside from the obvious vacation
> shots.

    And for scenery, you proably will want a wider lens than you
think you will from the film days.  Unless you go to a full frame sensor
(very expensive, and only from Canon so far), your lenses will be
behaving as though they were longer in terms of coverage.  For example:

Actual        Nikon        Canon
FL        Sees as        Sees as
==============================
35mm        52.5mm        56.0mm
28mm        42.0mm        44.8mm
20mm        30.0mm        32.0mm
18mm        27.0mm        28.8mm
16mm        24.0mm        25.6mm
12mm        18.0mm        19.2mm

    This is a result of the cameras' "crop factor" -- how much
smaller than a 35mm full frame film image the sensor really is.  This is
1.5 for Nikons, and 1.6 for most *affordable* Canons.

    Of course -- while this works against you when you are trying to
get wide angle coverage, it *helps* you with telephotos, if you need
really long lenses.  For example, a Nikon will make a 200mm lens cover
what a 300mm would on film, and on a Canon what a 320mm lens would cover
on film.

    I consider the wide angle problem to probably be more pressing
if you are after scenery photos.

    Enjoy,
        DoN.
Signature

Email:   <dnichols@d-and-d.com>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
          --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Eddie - 21 Aug 2006 10:47 GMT
> According to Bill  <bill@c.a>:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> Enjoy,
> DoN.

And 2.0 for Olympus

Eddie
dicktay - 20 Aug 2006 18:22 GMT
I'm am in the same boat, except it's only been about 10 years since using my
last film SLR, a Canon EOS 1000.
Just purchased a Canon 350 (Rebel XT) a couple of weeks ago along with a
17-85 IS Lens as well as the kit 75-300.
Didn't have any trouble converting - It was just like an old friend.  Even
better than before in the fact it performs a lot better in low light. The
only minus is that the 17-85 IS lens is not exactly compact and you do need
power supplies both for the camera and any backup devices you may be
carying, especially if is an extended trip.

See the following url for first attempts at low light shooting.
http://www.poseruniverse.com/Photography/Canon/IS_1600/Canon_1600_IS.html

We are off to Wyoming/London/Prague/Austria and Singapore for a vacation and
it will I am planning on taking lots of photos. It will be interesting to
see how it goes. My wife is taking a pocketable P&S for back up.

Be sure to budget for xtra rechargable batteries, memory cards and backup
solutions while you are on the road.
Hope this helps.
Richard

> Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
> place to start. I'm a beginner planning to buy an SLR camera in the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> received, about cameras suitable for someone nervous at the prospect
> but keen to give it a go.  Thanks alot.
Craig M - 20 Aug 2006 18:53 GMT
Let me put my 2 cents worth here Fran, I too also have recently converted to
DSLR from film, mine was over 25 years ago, a Cannon AE-1, I went with the
Nikon D-50 with the 18-55 lens, and I love it, get a 1 gig card, and a spare
battery, although the battery that comes with it is great, long life and
rechargable, and you will be set, I also agree with the others, go and try
and see how they feel and work for you, but I love my Nikon.
> Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
> place to start. I'm a beginner planning to buy an SLR camera in the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> received, about cameras suitable for someone nervous at the prospect
> but keen to give it a go.  Thanks alot.
Buy_Sell - 21 Aug 2006 02:33 GMT
I'm using the Nikon D70s and love it.  It has an exceptionally long
battery life.  I've heard that it can take 2,500 photos on a single
charge.  I haven't tried that yet, but it is usually over a week
between charges for me.  I live in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  You
certainly don't want to miss taking pictures in the Banff and Lake
Louise area in the Rocky Mountains.  This place will take your breathe
away.  I went to Niagara Falls, Ontario for my vacation last month and
that is another nice place that you won't want to miss.  Anyway, enjoy
your visit to Canada.  There are a lot of interesting places to visit.
AaronW - 21 Aug 2006 03:18 GMT
> Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
> place to start. I'm a beginner planning to buy an SLR camera in the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> received, about cameras suitable for someone nervous at the prospect
> but keen to give it a go.  Thanks alot.

Canon 350D

Canon 50/1.8
Canon 85/1.8

Canon 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS
Canon 70-300/4-5.6 IS

Canon 17-55/2.8 IS
Canon 70-200/2.8 IS

Canon 1.4x
Canon 2x

Canon 135/2
Canon 300/2.8 IS

http://digitcamera.tripod.com/#slr
Fran - 21 Aug 2006 03:39 GMT
> > Hi there. This might be the wrong group but it seems like a very good
> > place to start. I'm a beginner planning to buy an SLR camera in the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> http://digitcamera.tripod.com/#slr

Thanks everyone, I appreciate your advice very much.  I was finding all
the models/options quite overwhelming and only have limited time in
which to purchase and familiarise myself with a new camera before I
depart for BC from Sydney, Australia.  

Kind regards
Fran
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.