 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / August 2006Canon EOS 30D and 350D?
OK, i saw a thread about 20D and 350D,but still, i would like to have your opinion about other two models 30D or 350D - which one to bought - if it's OK to compare them. It seems that 30d is much better than 350D, but more expensive, sure. Currently i have Canon S2 compact, but i'm about going to DLSR, so any suggestions, please... THX! "Protoncek \(ex.SleeperMan\)" <protoHAHAHncek@bonbon.net> writes: > OK, i saw a thread about 20D and 350D,but still, i would like to have your > opinion about other two models 30D or 350D - which one to bought - if it's > OK to compare them. It seems that 30d is much better than 350D, but more > expensive, sure. Currently i have Canon S2 compact, but i'm about going to > DLSR, so any suggestions, please... Reading a combination of these wo should get you there. http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/eos_digital_rebel_xt_vs_20d.html http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/canon_eos_30D_review.html Unless you shoot sports and a LOT of em, I imagine you'ld be better served by taking the money saved by going 350D and spending it on glass. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ > "Protoncek \(ex.SleeperMan\)" <protoHAHAHncek@bonbon.net> writes: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > -- i see more and more that buying SLR will lead me into non-stop desire for something more to buy...lenses, flash, filters.... :-(( On 2006-08-20 13:57:50 +0200, "Protoncek \(ex.SleeperMan\)" <protoHAHAHncek@bonbon.net> said: >> Unless you shoot sports and a LOT of em, I imagine you'ld be better >> served by taking the money saved by going 350D and spending it on [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > i see more and more that buying SLR will lead me into non-stop desire > for something more to buy...lenses, flash, filters.... :-(( It's only a matter of time... Welcome :) > On 2006-08-20 13:57:50 +0200, "Protoncek \(ex.SleeperMan\)" > <protoHAHAHncek@bonbon.net> said: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > It's only a matter of time... Welcome :) i agree on that...i WILL have it..eventually... > > On 2006-08-20 13:57:50 +0200, "Protoncek \(ex.SleeperMan\)" > > <protoHAHAHncek@bonbon.net> said: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > > i agree on that...i WILL have it..eventually... Canon 350D Canon 50/1.8 Canon 85/1.8 Canon 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS Canon 70-300/4-5.6 IS Canon 17-55/2.8 IS Canon 70-200/2.8 IS Canon 1.4x Canon 2x Canon 135/2 Canon 300/2.8 IS http://digitcamera.tripod.com/#slr >>>On 2006-08-20 13:57:50 +0200, "Protoncek \(ex.SleeperMan\)" >>><protoHAHAHncek@bonbon.net> said: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Canon 135/2 > Canon 300/2.8 IS Enough with this stupid post. f.cking whore. Greg  Signature"All my time I spent in heaven Revelries of dance and wine Waking to the sound of laughter Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons Todd H. skrev: > Unless you shoot sports and a LOT of em, I imagine you'ld be better > served by taking the money saved by going 350D and spending it on > glass. Or if you shoot snow, or flowers, or anything else where you want spot metering. I didn't consider Canon's low or medium end until the 30D came. For me, the spot metering was a deal maker. (Altough I would ideally have liked the spot zone a bit smaller still.) And the 350D was never really an alternative. Because I also shoot scientific documentation with it, it had to enable digital verification of non-tampered images. Jan Böhme And the 350D was never really an alternative. Because I also shoot scientific documentation with it, it had to enable digital verification of non-tampered images. Jan Böhme ======= How does it do that? Don Porter > And the 350D was never really an alternative. Because I also shoot > scientific documentation with it, it had to enable digital verification > of non-tampered images. Curious now...How is that implemented in the 20D and 30D? Signature-- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.