Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New Canon??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
g n p - 16 Aug 2006 16:14 GMT
Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
Think I read it somewhere recently.
Thanks.
Bart van der Wolf - 16 Aug 2006 17:00 GMT
> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???

Most likely there is. Wait till next week for the official
announcements to be published.

Signature

Bart

ian - 16 Aug 2006 20:58 GMT
As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade to
this camera is likely.

>> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
>
> Most likely there is. Wait till next week for the official announcements
> to be published.
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 16 Aug 2006 21:04 GMT
> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade to
> this camera is likely.

The 5D is not very old at all.  The 30D does not compete well with its pixel
happy competitor, the Nikon D200 ... so I suspect something along that line,
if anything at all.

Signature

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE  34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

Isaiah Beard - 17 Aug 2006 05:24 GMT
>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade to
>> this camera is likely.
>
> The 5D is not very old at all.  The 30D does not compete well with its pixel
> happy competitor, the Nikon D200

I strongly disagree.  Anyone who compares the photos produced by the two
cameras has seen that the extra two megapixels isn't worth the price of
admission with the D200... UNLESS you're an avid Nikon fan, and either
have a lot of Nikon glass, or like buying Nikon for the sake of having a
Nikon.

Signature

E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

frederick - 17 Aug 2006 05:49 GMT
>>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an
>>> upgrade to this camera is likely.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> have a lot of Nikon glass, or like buying Nikon for the sake of having a
> Nikon.

or you want a big bright viewfinder...
Bill - 17 Aug 2006 07:26 GMT
>> The 5D is not very old at all.  The 30D does not compete well with its pixel
>> happy competitor, the Nikon D200
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>have a lot of Nikon glass, or like buying Nikon for the sake of having a
>Nikon.

There's a lot more to it than pixels or favouritism.
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 17 Aug 2006 13:59 GMT
>>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade to
>>> this camera is likely.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> have a lot of Nikon glass, or like buying Nikon for the sake of having a
> Nikon.

Reguardless, the Megapixels will sell.  If you could get a 30D with 8MP and
one with 10MP ... all else being identical including noise, which would you
buy?  The MP war, while a bit irrelavent technically, exists none-the-less.

Signature

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE  34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

Mark B. - 18 Aug 2006 11:46 GMT
> Reguardless, the Megapixels will sell.  If you could get a 30D with 8MP
> and
> one with 10MP ... all else being identical including noise, which would
> you
> buy?  The MP war, while a bit irrelavent technically, exists
> none-the-less.

If those extra 2 mp caused more noise at higher ISO, I'll take 8 thank you
very much.  This supposedly is exactly the reason Canon didn't go with more
than 8 on the 30D.

Mark
Darrell Larose - 19 Aug 2006 12:58 GMT
>> Reguardless, the Megapixels will sell.  If you could get a 30D with 8MP
>> and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> very much.  This supposedly is exactly the reason Canon didn't go with
> more than 8 on the 30D.

And why the Rebel XTi is only 8 megapixels, it has a larger screen and
better processing engine. But the pixel count remained the same. The current
Rebel XT will have a proce drop.
Mark B. - 17 Aug 2006 11:42 GMT
>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade
>> to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> line,
> if anything at all.

The 30D only came out in April.  I don't see it being replaced until at
least spring of '07.  More likely is a replacement for the Rebel XT/350D.

Mark
Bill - 17 Aug 2006 12:15 GMT
>>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade
>>> to  this camera is likely.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>The 30D only came out in April.  I don't see it being replaced until at
>least spring of '07.  More likely is a replacement for the Rebel XT/350D.

I expect to see a new Canon body below the 1D series, but above the 30D,
possibly in competition to the Nikon D80 and Sony A100. Perhaps a 3D
that would be a 5D lite model?

I don't think the XT/350D will get an update until February 2007 since
reports indicate it's still selling very well and with the 30D still
being relatively new, they can't over do it.
Tony Polson - 17 Aug 2006 13:31 GMT
>I expect to see a new Canon body below the 1D series, but above the 30D,
>possibly in competition to the Nikon D80 and Sony A100. Perhaps a 3D
>that would be a 5D lite model?

If there is a 3D, it will be *superior* to the 5D, not a 5D "lite".
Bill - 17 Aug 2006 17:22 GMT
>>I expect to see a new Canon body below the 1D series, but above the 30D,
>>possibly in competition to the Nikon D80 and Sony A100. Perhaps a 3D
>>that would be a 5D lite model?
>
>If there is a 3D, it will be *superior* to the 5D, not a 5D "lite".

Oops, that was supposed to say "...a 1D lite model".
Tony Polson - 17 Aug 2006 21:44 GMT
>>>I expect to see a new Canon body below the 1D series, but above the 30D,
>>>possibly in competition to the Nikon D80 and Sony A100. Perhaps a 3D
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Oops, that was supposed to say "...a 1D lite model".

OK, understood.

I will soon be buying another Canon body so I am very interested in
what might come next.  I was happy with my EOS 3 so a robust 3D with
weather sealing would be a perfect companion to the 5D, which is
lacking in those two areas.
Darrell Larose - 19 Aug 2006 13:01 GMT
>>>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an
>>>> upgrade
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> reports indicate it's still selling very well and with the 30D still
> being relatively new, they can't over do it.

The 350D/XT will have a replacement called the XTi that will be announced on
the 24th of August. Canon will also reveal a line of HD camcorders.
Mark² - 17 Aug 2006 20:36 GMT
>>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an
>>> upgrade to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> at least spring of '07.  More likely is a replacement for the Rebel
> XT/350D.

Remember the D60?
It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30 and the 10D.
Yes...it was close to a year before the 10D announcement, but we'll see what
happens.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the exact same specs/build/features as the
30D, but with a couple more MPs just to keep Nikon jumping.

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Mark B. - 18 Aug 2006 02:45 GMT
> Remember the D60?
> It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30 and the
> 10D.
> Yes...it was close to a year before the 10D announcement, but we'll see
> what happens.

Dates from dpreview.com:

D60 announced Feb 22 '02
10D announced Feb 27 '03

So it was actually a full year.  No, a 30D replacement would be EXTREMELY
unlikely in less than 6 months.

Mark
Mark² - 18 Aug 2006 03:20 GMT
>> Remember the D60?
>> It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30 and
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> So it was actually a full year.  No, a 30D replacement would be
> EXTREMELY unlikely in less than 6 months.

Perhaps true.  February...

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

SkipM - 17 Aug 2006 21:55 GMT
>>> Remember the D60?
>>> It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30 and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Perhaps true.  February...

'Bout the same time as the earliest I'd anticipate a 5D update, too.

Signature

Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com

Mark² - 18 Aug 2006 08:44 GMT
>>>> Remember the D60?
>>>> It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30 and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> 'Bout the same time as the earliest I'd anticipate a 5D update, too.

About the only things I can think of for improvement on the 5D would be
better seals (though I have yet to discover my first dust speck on the
sensor--pretty amazing actually or simply lucky) and perhaps Digic III for
higher frame-rate/processing (don't need it on this whopper sensor, but...).
Other than that, I see little else lacking...unless they went ahead and made
that mythical 3D with a built-in vertical grip.  Oh wait!!!!  I almost
forgot the stupidest thing on the 5D...that pesky printer button!!  Argh.
As has been moaned about for months...it is utterly useless, pointless and
an irritating waste of space.  At LEAST they could offer a firmware update
to give it some other functionality...  Oh well.  It's a side-line anoyance,
but mainly because it's so stupid.  .  :)

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

SkipM - 18 Aug 2006 17:27 GMT
>>>>> Remember the D60?
>>>>> It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30 and
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Oh well.  It's a side-line anoyance, but mainly because it's so stupid.  .
> :)

I'd really like a simpler wat to access mirror lock up.  Buried in the
menus, it discourages me from using it to shoot macros.  That would be an
appropriate use for the print button, as far as I'm concerned.

Signature

Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com

Mark² - 18 Aug 2006 21:18 GMT
>>>>>> Remember the D60?
>>>>>> It was a somewhat short-lived stop-gap upgrade between the D30
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> menus, it discourages me from using it to shoot macros.  That would
> be an appropriate use for the print button, as far as I'm concerned.

That was my thought also.  Ideally, they'd make that a customizable button
via firmware change...  Maybe some hacker can do it, though I've always been
hesitant to use hacked firmware.

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Scott in Florida - 19 Aug 2006 02:49 GMT
>I'd really like a simpler wat to access mirror lock up.  Buried in the
>menus, it discourages me from using it to shoot macros.  That would be an
>appropriate use for the print button, as far as I'm concerned.

I wonder if the print button could be remapped to do mirror lockup...

Signature

Scott in Florida

'The Land of the Free because of the Brave'

Jørn Dahl-Stamnes - 19 Aug 2006 12:37 GMT
>>I'd really like a simpler wat to access mirror lock up.  Buried in the
>>menus, it discourages me from using it to shoot macros.  That would be an
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I wonder if the print button could be remapped to do mirror lockup...

That would be nice :-)

Signature

Jørn Dahl-Stamnes
http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/

Darrell Larose - 19 Aug 2006 12:59 GMT
>>> As there are rebates even in the uk for the 5D i should think an upgrade
>>> to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> The 30D only came out in April.  I don't see it being replaced until at
> least spring of '07.  More likely is a replacement for the Rebel XT/350D.

Yup, the Rebel XTi 8 megapixel, big LCD and improved processor.
C J Southern - 16 Aug 2006 22:38 GMT
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/Canon_1DS_MkIII.html
Mark B. - 17 Aug 2006 02:15 GMT
> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
> Think I read it somewhere recently.
> Thanks.

Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and won't post it
on the internet.

Mark
Ruman - 17 Aug 2006 03:44 GMT
> > Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
> > Think I read it somewhere recently.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Mark

I always have wondered what serious harm could it really impose if the
major camera manufacturers had some sort of future roadmaps published.
Mark² - 17 Aug 2006 06:09 GMT
>>> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
>>> Think I read it somewhere recently.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I always have wondered what serious harm could it really impose if the
> major camera manufacturers had some sort of future roadmaps published.

Simple:
It's a marketing guide...for the competition, and an
existing-model-sales-killer...as people then know they can simply "hold out"
for the new model they would then KNOW is coming.

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Ruman - 19 Aug 2006 05:39 GMT
> >>> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
> >>> Think I read it somewhere recently.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
>         www.pbase.com/markuson

So If I know Nikon would roll out a 16MP camera after 1.5~2 years, I
would not rather prefer to go without *any* camera at all till then?
Without spending any money on existing cameras?
Again, I can not see any *serious* harm of publishing the roadmap -
going without one might give them some edge past their rivals, catching
them unwarranted. But then again, following this "marketing guide", if
someone tells me Canon has started make a reply of D80 only now - I do
not see any reason to buy that. They must have far superior knowledge
of where the technology is heading or what their opponents might be
rolling out in recent future - so publishing the roadmap or no, should
not make much affect on their rivals' plan anyway.
But it might give us the customers, some good idea and scope of
personal planning instead of asking around cluelessly about say, "New
Canon??"
Ruman - 19 Aug 2006 05:42 GMT
> > >>> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
> > >>> Think I read it somewhere recently.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> So If I know Nikon would roll out a 16MP camera after 1.5~2 years, I
> would not rather prefer to go without *any* camera at all till then?

I mean would rather, of course. Apologies.
Mark² - 19 Aug 2006 05:57 GMT
>>>>>> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
>>>>>> Think I read it somewhere recently.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> I mean would rather, of course. Apologies.

Much of this applies to those who are considering upgrades--not just those
who have no camera.  This applied to myself with a lens purchase.  Had I
known ahead of time that Canon was about to release the 24-105 f4 IS L...I
would likely have waited for it.  Because I DIDN'T know...I went ahead and
bought the equally expensive 24-70 2.8 L...which is now collecting dust
while I use the lens I REALLY wished for (and got), the 24-105 IS.  That's
called a "GOTCHA" and Canon "got me" on that one.  I'm sure they're quite
happy about it, too.  :)

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Mark² - 19 Aug 2006 05:54 GMT
>>> I always have wondered what serious harm could it really impose if
>>> the major camera manufacturers had some sort of future roadmaps
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> personal planning instead of asking around cluelessly about say, "New
> Canon??"

Here's a simple example:
My uncle bought the Canon D30 (3.25MP DSLR), which was a HUGE purchase for
him...being the spend-thrift he is...and only DAYS (not weeks...DAYS) later,
Canon announced the D60, which essentially doubled the resolution for LESS
money.  Had my uncle known this, he would NEVER have bought the D30.  So...
Extrapolate this my thousands of purchasers, and its easy to see why it is
to Canon's advantage to keep these things close to their chest.  Otherwise,
they end up with huge quantities of older-model cameras on shelves.  This
makes re-sellers EXTREMELY unhappy.  My uncle's D30 would have been left
collecting dust had he known the D60 was coming out.

Save'?

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Bill - 17 Aug 2006 07:26 GMT
>> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and won't post it
>> on the internet.
>
>I always have wondered what serious harm could it really impose if the
>major camera manufacturers had some sort of future roadmaps published.

You're kidding, right?

Have you heard the term, "one upmanship"?

If you get the jump on the competition, you get the bonus of initial
sales and possibly leadership sales if the camera catches on well with
buyers.

Brand recognition is very important in sales.
-hh - 17 Aug 2006 19:19 GMT
> >> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and
> >> won't post it on the internet.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Have you heard the term, "one upmanship"?

Or "Osborne Computer Corporation"?

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_Effect>

-hh
Bill - 17 Aug 2006 19:29 GMT
>> >I always have wondered what serious harm could it really impose if the
>> >major camera manufacturers had some sort of future roadmaps published.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Or "Osborne Computer Corporation"?

Whole cows, Batman!

I haven't heard that one in a while.

:-)
ian - 17 Aug 2006 20:01 GMT
>> >> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and
>> >> won't post it on the internet.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -hh

I remember the Alto computer.  Same thing happened.  I do like the exception
being the mac.  The announcement that they were going over to intel did not
osbourne.  In fact next two quarters yielded record sales as loyal mac users
bought up the latest offerings before changing over to dreaded Intel.
RichA - 18 Aug 2006 05:19 GMT
> >> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and won't post it
> >> on the internet.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Brand recognition is very important in sales.

How many mfgs besides Canon could afford to switch strategy in
midstream or make
significant physical changes to a camera if they had info about another
mfg's model?
None.
Ruman - 19 Aug 2006 05:25 GMT
> >> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and won't post it
> >> on the internet.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You're kidding, right?

No, I usually come here to learn something, unlike few. Why?

> Have you heard the term, "one upmanship"?

Yes I have.

> If you get the jump on the competition, you get the bonus of initial
> sales and possibly leadership sales if the camera catches on well with
> buyers.

So you have to use the trick of fooling the customers by using their
ignorance of buying anything labeled as "new". That makes sense if
only your product equals your rivals' instead of topping, or even fails
perhaps.

> Brand recognition is very important in sales

What does that have to do anything with publishing a roadmap or not?
Most other industries are doing that already, look at M$ for example -
they even have their 2008 roadmap published! Or movie industries -
every release date is scheduled and mostly maintained.
If I am loyal to some brand, I will wait till their promised model
shows up, given I have access to the roadmap.
Take a look at http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/tokina2006.jpg or
http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/dc/xeon/238663.htm?page=2
I do not see how this can harm any business other than jacking up the
competition for a better product, or help the customers synonimously.
Mark² - 19 Aug 2006 06:05 GMT
>>>> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and
>>>> won't post it on the internet.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Most other industries are doing that already, look at M$ for example -
> they even have their 2008 roadmap published!

Microsoft's needs are different, however.
THEY...need to persuade those who might be considering "jumping ship" to
Apple or Linux, or others...that Microsoft "really does have the latest and
greatest just around the corner..."  -So in other words, their message
is..."Wait just a LITTLE longer before you give up on Microsoft!  -You'll
love us in '08, so *don't invest your company in that Linux thing..."

>Or movie industries -
> every release date is scheduled and mostly maintained.

Movies are unique, and offer no basis for comparison here.
Totally different concept and product...and not based on technical specs
that require guarded secrecy.

> If I am loyal to some brand, I will wait till their promised model
> shows up, given I have access to the roadmap.

Or...You'll look at that future roadmap and use it as your rationale to
switch brands because the "other guy" has a more attractive map.

Look.  This is REAL simple.  The companies refrain from publishing this
because they have gone to great lengths in determining that it is in THEIR
interest to keep it secret.  Of course it would be great to know...but
that's not what they're after.  They're after you money, and they know darn
well that giving away their secrets doesn't help them get to your money as
easily.  If it would help...believe me...they would do it.

> Take a look at http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/tokina2006.jpg or
> http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/dc/xeon/238663.htm?page=2
> I do not see how this can harm any business other than jacking up the
> competition for a better product, or help the customers synonimously.

Tokina has nothng to lose.  They need all the attention they can get because
they are a small-time player--not known for innovation or ground-breaking
anything.  They are like clothing lines at Wal-Mart compared to Canon/Nikon
as Versace/Calvin Klein.  Nobody looks to Wal-Mart as the fashion standard.
They look to them as the standard for "cheap" sales and little else.

Signature

Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
       www.pbase.com/markuson

Bill - 19 Aug 2006 14:14 GMT
>> If you get the jump on the competition, you get the bonus of initial
>> sales and possibly leadership sales if the camera catches on well with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>only your product equals your rivals' instead of topping, or even fails
>perhaps.

Highly competitive electronics are very oriented towards offering more
than the competition for a given price point. This applies to things
like digital cameras, cell phones, computers, etc.

If no one could really offer anything new, then it wouldn't matter and
you could publish a roadmap.

>Most other industries are doing that already, look at M$ for example -
>they even have their 2008 roadmap published!

I don't think most industries are doing that. Some industries can get
away with it, but it's usually in a market with little competition.

As Mark said, for Micro$oft it's in their best interests to let
customers know that something is coming.

>I do not see how this can harm any business other than jacking up the
>competition for a better product, or help the customers synonimously.

If Canon knew a year ago that Nikon was going to release a new camera in
September with a 10mp sensor at $999, you could bet Canon would have
been ready to release a camera that meets or beats the performance in
August for the same price, taking sales away from Nikon.

Why do you think Nikon had a teaser before announcing the D80? They
wanted to keep customers from buying the Sony A100.
Darrell Larose - 19 Aug 2006 13:06 GMT
>> Is there a new Canon SLR to be announced end of August???
>> Think I read it somewhere recently.
>> Thanks.
>
> Maybe.  But then again maybe not.  Anyone that knows can't and won't post
> it on the internet.

The current Canon leak is Magic Lantern Guide is already marketing the
Digital Rebel XTi guide. The only new Canon dSLR that I've heard about is
the Rebel XTi. It has 8 megapixels, large LCD new processor and sensor shake
cleaning. The current XT will have a price drop and will likely remain in
production for at least 9 months. The sub $1000 is the "hot" market segment
right now.
Darrell Larose - 19 Aug 2006 13:10 GMT
"Darrell Larose" <spam@this.invalid> wrote in message news:...

>> Mark B. wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> The 350D/XT will have a replacement called the XTi that will be announced
> on the 24th of August. Canon will also reveal a line of HD camcorders.

There will be also a 22 megapixel 1Ds mk.II replacement with a 24x36mm CMOS,
I don't know if it will be announced next week or at PhotoKina 2006.

Rumours have suggested it was medium-format, my sources say it's a 24x36mm
NOT! 48x26mm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.