> I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> How sucessful is this - I appreciate that they'll only work as 'manual'
> lenses but that's how I use them now.
> > I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> They will also work in stop-down mode, which can be a bit of a hassle.
> Also, practically all of them will become telephoto lenses...
As I understand it, the effective focal length would double on the
E-500?
> > Any other comments positive or negative regarding the E-500?
>
> In value-for-money it's hard to beat, but personally I would recommend
> you get the two-zoom kit and forget about the OM lenses...it's probably
> not worth it. (except maybe if you have a nice 180mm f/2 or a 300mm or
> so.)
It was the two zoom kit I was considering getting - the ability to use
my OM lenses was really only a bonus. I've got three, all Zuiko which
work nicely with the OM-4 - I also use extension tubes quite a bit,
especially with the 50 mm f/1.8 for macro work.
> a website with lots of images (with all kinds of lenses) is
> http://www.myfourthirds.com
>
> ;-)
> Lourens

Signature
Larry Stoter
Lourens Smak - 09 Jul 2006 23:52 GMT
> > > I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> As I understand it, the effective focal length would double on the
> E-500?
approximately; the E-500 makes images in 3:4 aspect ratio instead of the
2:3 of the OM system, so it depends a bit if you calculate horizontally,
diagonally, or vertically...
> > > Any other comments positive or negative regarding the E-500?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> It was the two zoom kit I was considering getting - the ability to use
> my OM lenses was really only a bonus.
OK, that's a bit different maybe, but assuming you don't have OM lenses
below 14mm, that leaves longer telephoto's and maybe very fast lenses as
interesting add-ons.
> I've got three, all Zuiko which
> work nicely with the OM-4 - I also use extension tubes quite a bit,
> especially with the 50 mm f/1.8 for macro work.
For macro stop-down metering and such may not be that much of a problem,
but on the other hand I can also imagine it requires stopping down to
f/16 or f/22 often, which will be problematic in some cases as the
viewfinder will be practically unuseable then.
Personally I would get the E-system extension tube instead of the OM
adapter, if I were you. They cost about the same. It seems to work great
with the 40-150mm. Sample picture:
http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=15445
;-)
Lourens