Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Olympus E-500 DSLR

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Larry Stoter - 03 Jul 2006 19:33 GMT
I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.

One attraction is that I currently have an OM-4 with several lenses and
understand that is an adapter to convert the OM lenses to the 4/3
E-series.

How sucessful is this - I appreciate that they'll only work as 'manual'
lenses but that's how I use them now.

Any other comments positive or negative regarding the E-500?
Signature

Larry Stoter

Lourens - 03 Jul 2006 21:42 GMT
> I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> How sucessful is this - I appreciate that they'll only work as 'manual'
> lenses but that's how I use them now.

They will also work in stop-down mode, which can be a bit of a hassle.
Also, practically all of them will become telephoto lenses...

> Any other comments positive or negative regarding the E-500?

In value-for-money it's hard to beat, but personally I would recommend
you get the two-zoom kit and forget about the OM lenses...it's probably
not worth it. (except maybe if you have a nice 180mm f/2 or a 300mm or
so.)

a website with lots of images (with all kinds of lenses) is
http://www.myfourthirds.com

;-)
Lourens
Larry Stoter - 05 Jul 2006 20:38 GMT
> > I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> They will also work in stop-down mode, which can be a bit of a hassle.
> Also, practically all of them will become telephoto lenses...

As I understand it, the effective focal length would double on the
E-500?

> > Any other comments positive or negative regarding the E-500?
>
> In value-for-money it's hard to beat, but personally I would recommend
> you get the two-zoom kit and forget about the OM lenses...it's probably
> not worth it. (except maybe if you have a nice 180mm f/2 or a 300mm or
> so.)

It was the two zoom kit I was considering getting - the ability to use
my OM lenses was really only a bonus. I've got three, all Zuiko which
work nicely with the OM-4 - I also use extension tubes quite a bit,
especially with the 50 mm f/1.8 for macro work.

> a website with lots of images (with all kinds of lenses) is
> http://www.myfourthirds.com
>
> ;-)
> Lourens

Signature

Larry Stoter

Lourens Smak - 09 Jul 2006 23:52 GMT
> > > I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> As I understand it, the effective focal length would double on the
> E-500?

approximately; the E-500 makes images in 3:4 aspect ratio instead of the
2:3 of the OM system, so it depends a bit if you calculate horizontally,
diagonally, or vertically...

> > > Any other comments positive or negative regarding the E-500?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> It was the two zoom kit I was considering getting - the ability to use
> my OM lenses was really only a bonus.

OK, that's a bit different maybe, but assuming you don't have OM lenses
below 14mm, that leaves longer telephoto's and maybe very fast lenses as
interesting add-ons.

> I've got three, all Zuiko which
> work nicely with the OM-4 - I also use extension tubes quite a bit,
> especially with the 50 mm f/1.8 for macro work.

For macro stop-down metering and such may not be that much of a problem,
but on the other hand I can also imagine it requires stopping down to
f/16 or f/22 often, which will be problematic in some cases as the
viewfinder will be practically unuseable then.

Personally I would get the E-system extension tube instead of the OM
adapter, if I were you. They cost about the same. It seems to work great
with the 40-150mm. Sample picture:
http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=15445

;-)
Lourens
RichA - 03 Jul 2006 23:15 GMT
> I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> Larry Stoter

It works fine.  The adapter is the MF-1 which costs about $100.  You
can also get cheaper
Chinese knock-offs but I can't say how they work.  You can use any OM
lens on
the digital with the adapter, however, focus points can be slightly
shifted, for instance, the
infinity focus point of a 100-200mm is slightly different.  Shutter
speed priority does not
work (from what I've seen with my E-1) but P, A and M do work.
Experiment and bracket.
Here is what the adapter looks like:
http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/58854386

One benefit of using lenses (OM Zuiko) designed for 35mm film is the
size of
their image circle.  Generally, this mean zero or little vignetting on
a sensor
2x smaller.

http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/58937829

But, one important things is that you can buy things like the 50mm f1.4
for low-light
shooting because there is nothing available like it in Olympus digital
stocks.
Larry Stoter - 05 Jul 2006 20:38 GMT
> > I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> for low-light shooting because there is nothing available like it in
> Olympus digital stocks.

I have a 50 mm f/1.8 Zuiko, which I guess becomes 100 mm but is it still
f/1.8 on the E-500?
Signature

Larry Stoter

Lourens Smak - 09 Jul 2006 23:58 GMT
> I have a 50 mm f/1.8 Zuiko, which I guess becomes 100 mm but is it still
> f/1.8 on the E-500?

of course!
NB: the focal length also does not change. it will still be a 50mm
f/1.8. You will just be using a smaller part of the image that this lens
produces.

Lourens.
wilt - 04 Jul 2006 14:36 GMT
> I'm considering purchasing an Olympus E-500 DSLR.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> Larry Stoter

You should investigate 'WHAT, if anything...' can be done better with
the Olympus adapter for OM-to-E500 than mounting the same lens on any
other camera.  I use my OM lenses with my Canon 20D with an aftermarket
adapter.  Of course, it is manual focus manual diaphram.  But I love to
use them in low light, because I have all fast prime lenses (fastest
f/1.4 slowest f/2.8) or special lenses (24mm Perspective Correction)
from my OM system.  For available light the lenses will be used near
wide open anyway, so auto diaphram is no big thing (and I grew up in
the days that preset lenses were not uncommon like now).  I grew up
with manual focus and the 20D comes with a screen that is not terrible
for manual focus.
Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner - 05 Jul 2006 17:20 GMT
> One attraction is that I currently have an OM-4 with several lenses and
> understand that is an adapter to convert the OM lenses to the 4/3
> E-series.
> How sucessful is this - I appreciate that they'll only work as 'manual'
> lenses but that's how I use them now.

    I have an E-300 and a couple OM lenses I use with the adapter.  If
you're used to using them purely manually you should be pretty happy.
"Manual" focus on the native 4/3 lenses (really, fly-by-wire focus) is
kind of a pain, because it's slow and not very precise, but it's a joy
on lenses which were actually designed for manual focus.  A couple
points to be aware of are
a) the 2x effective focal length factor - on the downside, it means that
all your wideangles become normal lenses; on the upside, it means that
cheap and light 1000mm lenses are now within your reach!
b) it's fairly demanding on the lenses; pictures taken with mine are a
hair softer than I'd like.

Read http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/omz.html and
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/any-lens.html; the author addresses
some concerns about the use of non-4/3 lenses on 4/3 cameras.

Signature

Oh to have a lodge in some vast wilderness.  Where rumors of oppression
and deceit, of unsuccessful and successful wars may never reach me
anymore.  
    -- William Cowper

Larry Stoter - 05 Jul 2006 20:38 GMT
> > One attraction is that I currently have an OM-4 with several lenses and
> > understand that is an adapter to convert the OM lenses to the 4/3
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> all your wideangles become normal lenses; on the upside, it means that
> cheap and light 1000mm lenses are now within your reach!

I have a 200 mm f/4, which I guess becomes 400 mm but is it still f/4?
> b) it's fairly demanding on the lenses; pictures taken with mine are a
> hair softer than I'd like.
>
> Read http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/omz.html and
> http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/any-lens.html; the author addresses
> some concerns about the use of non-4/3 lenses on 4/3 cameras.

Signature

Larry Stoter

Stacey - 06 Jul 2006 01:33 GMT
> I have a 200 mm f/4, which I guess becomes 400 mm but is it still f/4?

Yes..

Signature


 Stacey

RichA - 06 Jul 2006 02:22 GMT
> > > One attraction is that I currently have an OM-4 with several lenses and
> > > understand that is an adapter to convert the OM lenses to the 4/3
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> --
> Larry Stoter

Yes, it's still f4, focal ratio doesn't change, nor does true focal
length, just effective
focal length.  You essentially put 8 megapixels into a scene 4x smaller
than you would
get with a 35mm camera, which translates into higher resolution than
another 8 megapixel camera with a smaller sensor "crop" ratio.  I just
picked up a 300mm f4.5
Olympus OM lens and it's nice to be able to carry a "compact" 600mm
f4.5 lens around
that only cost about $500.00.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.