Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
amateur photog or is it necessary to update
to the D70S. I was planning to purchase the
D50 and the better glass 18-70 lens.
However I am told I was should get the D70S
body with the 18 -55 lens.
Anybody out there with these cameras and lenses.
Your input will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Denny B
Rudy Benner - 27 Jun 2006 14:18 GMT
> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Thanks in advance
> Denny B
Bought the D-50 with the 18-70 lens. If I was to do it again, I would get
the D-70 with the same lens. I would not buy the D-70 with the 18-55 lens.
In particular, the extra features I would like are the top LCD illumination,
the DOF preview and the nose grease guard. I can live with the tiny SD card.
Rebecca Ore - 27 Jun 2006 14:38 GMT
> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Anybody out there with these cameras and lenses.
> Your input will be much appreciated.
Do go with the better glass. I've got the D50 and three lenses: the
18-70, the f/1.8 50 mm lens (great portrait lens and really sharp) and
the VR 105 macro (still new to me, very sharp). What's missing on the
D50 is wired shutter release (add-on), depth of field preview, and
some button control rather than menu control, and some additional
white balance control. The D50 has a somewhat newer sensor and is
supposedly better in low light.
If the two bodies are only $100 difference in price, I'd go for the
D70s, but with either the f/1.8 50 mm lens or with the 18-70. The kit
lens for the D50 has a plastic lens mount. The 18-70 has rubber
gaskets and a steel lens mount.
If you're not interested in manual controls that much and if you never
missed a depth of field preview on your earlier cameras, the D50 is a
fine camera. The f/1.8 50mm is well worth having as a cheap, good
low-light portrait lens:
http://pics.livejournal.com/mouseworks/pic/0005aqke/g14

Signature
Rebecca Ore
Clemens Dorda - 27 Jun 2006 15:17 GMT
Rebecca Ore schrieb:
> Do go with the better glass.
Yes, that's exactly the advice I'd like to give Denny, too. In general,
it's valid for each manufacturer. In my opinion, choose the better lens
& cheaper body combination, if you think about buying this or the better
body & cheaper lens combination. Each manufacturer, if it's name is
Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Pentax, ..., makes entry-level bodies which
are good enough for most amateurs. But the entry-level lenses have some
flaws in the most cases, so it's recommended to take the better ones.
Clemens
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 27 Jun 2006 15:04 GMT
> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
> to the D70S. I was planning to purchase the
> D50 and the better glass 18-70 lens.
> However I am told I was should get the D70S
> body with the 18 -55 lens.
What do you plan to do with the camera? In my opinion, the extra control
wheel is worth the extra cash alone with the D70s (I own the D70 and love it
... I am avoiding looking at the D200 to avoid temptation). Also, do NOT get
the 18-55mm lens ... it is no where near the image or build quality of the
18-70 AF-S lens (true AF-S).
> Anybody out there with these cameras and lenses.
> Your input will be much appreciated.
I have the 18-70 lens on my D70. I highly recommend it. I have handled the
18-55 in a store and found it to be noisy and cheap feeling. I have read
about the image quality, but have no evaluated the results first hand.
Here is a nice image I took with my D70 and 18-70mm lens over the weekend :-)
Lake Superior near Split Rock Lighthouse.
http://www.veldy.net/~veldy/pics/water.jpg

Signature
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
Dr. Boggis - 27 Jun 2006 18:33 GMT
> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
> to the D70S. I was planning to purchase the
> D50 and the better glass 18-70 lens.
> However I am told I was should get the D70S
> body with the 18 -55 lens.
It depends what you want. I am a first time SLR user, and I bought a D50
with the 18-70mm lens. It would have been another $100 or so to get a
D70s, but I spent that and a bit more on a longer zoom to go with it.
There are by far enough options on the D50 to confuse me, but if you're
more experienced then you might prefer the extra control of the D70s.
Don't get the 18-55mm lens though, it is considered rather poor. If you
get a D70s kit, it should come with the 18-70mm.

Signature
-Take out Ron to reply-
My random photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/boggissimo/
Bill - 27 Jun 2006 21:29 GMT
>Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
>amateur photog or is it necessary to update
>to the D70S. I was planning to purchase the
>D50 and the better glass 18-70 lens.
I think the other posts cover most of what I would have said - make sure
you get the 18-70mm lense with either body. It's definitely the better
lense with a wider zoom range, true AF-S motor offering full-time manual
focus, and great optics.
As for the body, the D50 is just as good as the D70s. The difference is
a few features and controls.
If you're new to SLR, then perhaps save your money and get the D50. But
if you have some experience and want more control, then the D70s has
more in this regard.
Peter A. Stavrakoglou - 28 Jun 2006 02:27 GMT
>>Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
>>amateur photog or is it necessary to update
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> if you have some experience and want more control, then the D70s has
> more in this regard.
There is one difference not noted thus far: the D50 has a newer
sensor than the D70s. Supposedly, the D50's sensor handles noise
better.
carl valle - 28 Jun 2006 04:20 GMT
>>> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
>>> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> sensor than the D70s. Supposedly, the D50's sensor handles noise
> better.
even though the D50 is supposed to handle noise better, the tradeoff is
that it is done in software not on the sensor so that the D70 is
actually a bit sharper but with more noise
Tien - 27 Jun 2006 23:09 GMT
> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
> amateur photog
Of course, this is a loaded question since there are "amateurs" and
then there are "Amateurs". Since money is always an issue for someone
who asks this question, the question should be rephrased according to
your level of expertise already achieved, what you expect to produce as
pictures compared to previous digital or film cameras and what your
future plans are.
If you are a neophyte, relatively speaking of course, the D50 is more
than enough to give you superior images than what most point and shoots
will provide. (If you take 20-25 rolls for 36 per year, or atleast had
done so in the past, you most likely will have more demanding tastes
and will be able to take advantage of the D70 or D200. If you take 3-5
rolls per year, the D50 is probably enough to satisfy you.) The most
improvement in picture quality however, IMHO will occur when you
purchase an SB600 or SB800 with these cameras. If you are more
demanding, you will want the SB800 but then, you should probably get
the D70s or D200 if you are thinking about the SB800. The big
difference apparently between the D50 and D70s is the finer white
balance control and commander function built-in found in the D70s, but
I have never used the D70s. I got the D50 and swapped it in for a D200
after 10 days. If you are a quick learner, you won`t be disappointed
with the D70s or D200 and I don`t think they are "too much camera" to
handle for an enthousiast.
Tien
PS: Sorry, I can`t help you with the lens selection since I use an old
20-35 mm but if you are a neophyte, a traditionalist like me would not
hesistate to recommend the trusty 50mm f1.8 as one of the essential
lenses. It is very sharp and great for full-lenth portraits.
Denny B - 28 Jun 2006 04:41 GMT
>> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
>> amateur photog
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> hesistate to recommend the trusty 50mm f1.8 as one of the essential
> lenses. It is very sharp and great for full-lenth portraits.
Thanks to all who replied to my posting. After work today
I went and had a look at the D50 and D70S. As of now I am settled
on the D70S kit. I find the D50 18-55 kit lens clumsy having to
use the very front of the lens to manual focus, this is not a way
a lens should focus. I find the 70S is a camera I can get used to,
however I am a guy who does not change equipment often, my Pentax film
slr collection built over the last 35 years can attest to that. I feel
I would like to rest my two spot meters, three incident meters and
seven manual lenses and enjoy the Nikon 70S mostly on auto light
metering and auto focus and enjoy taking pictures again and let all
the gadgetry have a rest.
Thank you all for your input.
Denny B
Bill - 28 Jun 2006 11:55 GMT
>Thanks to all who replied to my posting. After work today
>I went and had a look at the D50 and D70S. As of now I am settled
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>metering and auto focus and enjoy taking pictures again and let all
>the gadgetry have a rest.
Welcome to digital photography! If you liked film, and you like
computers, you're gonna love digital...
Happy snapping!
:-)
Denny B - 28 Jun 2006 14:03 GMT
>> Thanks to all who replied to my posting. After work today
>> I went and had a look at the D50 and D70S. As of now I am settled
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> :-)
Bill thank you, looking forward to it.
Will be my first digital camera. I did not
go the point and shoot route. Have remained
film up to now. Spend a lot of money every
year on film, Fuji Provia and Velvia slide film is
not cheap these days and you take it where
you can get it.
Thanks kindly
Denny B
J. Clarke - 28 Jun 2006 13:01 GMT
>>> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
>>> amateur photog
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> metering and auto focus and enjoy taking pictures again and let all
> the gadgetry have a rest.
Whoa, STOP. You have a Pentax system developed over 35 years? If that's
the case then I'd go with either Pentax or Canon, not Nikon, simply because
you can use your existing lenses. The D70s is a very nice piece of kit,
but very honestly even the most rabid Nikon fan will tell you that it's not
enough better than the Canon and Pentax equivalents to justify tossing your
existing system.
You may _think_ that you don't want to use those seven manual lenses, but if
you can't use them you'll miss them.
Personally I'd look _real_ hard at the Pentax K100 when it ships.

Signature
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Sheldon - 01 Jul 2006 02:03 GMT
> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Thanks in advance
> Denny B
I'd think you would be happy with either camera. The D70s has some
advantages, but would you need or use them? That said, definitely get the
18~70 lens. It's a great lens my anybody's standards, and it also gets
great reviews. Only drawback is it would be nice if the lens was a little
"faster." But, that would make it bigger and heavier, so the 18~70 on any
Nikon DSLR is a great package. As far as other lenses for your camera that
depends on what you like to take pictures of, but that 18~70 is an
incredible bargain and great all-around lens. If I had to walk out the door
with only one lens that would be it.
Jethro Bodine - 02 Jul 2006 01:01 GMT
>> Is a Nikon D50 an adequate camera for an
>> amateur photog or is it necessary to update
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>995) I love the hell out of it. The 18-70 is a fine lense but personally
>I don't want any more cheap glass.