I was in a store on Sat. and they had a rack of brochures. You don't
see this much
anymore with the internet, but I leafed through a Nikon brochure for
the D50. All I can say
is that they had a full page shot in it that IMO could not have been
taken with a sub-FF
dslr. It looked as good (detail, sharpness) as 4x5." There were
absolutely no flaws in it
to let you know that it was taken by a digital camera, no glowing edges
to indicate sharpening,
no artifacts, no blown out highlights, no grain/noise. I really wonder
whether it was in-fact
taken with the D50. If so, it was amazing.
Rudy Benner - 12 Jun 2006 19:01 GMT
>I was in a store on Sat. and they had a rack of brochures. You don't
> see this much
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> whether it was in-fact
> taken with the D50. If so, it was amazing.
So you went and bought the company? No?
Your line breaks are always weird, I know others have mentioned it.
Maybe its me that is weird, I know its been said by some.
I know they are wrong.
Everyone is entitled to their own stupid opinion afterall.
R.