Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SanDisk extreme II en III

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kris.vandevijver@gmail.com - 11 Jun 2006 09:37 GMT
Hi guys,

Simple question:   I've got a D70s,  would I benefit from an extreme
III CF as opposed to an extreme II card?

Thanks,
Kris
Pete D - 11 Jun 2006 10:22 GMT
I am doubtful that you would notice the difference unless you put it in a
card reader and ran some tests with a stopwatch.
.

> Hi guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thanks,
> Kris
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 11 Jun 2006 11:58 GMT
>Hi guys,
>
>Simple question:   I've got a D70s,  would I benefit from an extreme
>III CF as opposed to an extreme II card?

How often do you shoot in continuous mode and fill the camera buffer up
having to wait for images to be written to the card before you can take
another shot?  If not the only difference you would see is using a usb2
card reader to transfer files.
--
Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
Wolfgang Schmittenhammer - 11 Jun 2006 13:21 GMT
Personally, I stay away from anything with the SanDisk name on
it...........I stick with Kingston...

Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) wrote:

>>Hi guys,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Ed Ruf (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
> http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 11 Jun 2006 13:32 GMT
> Personally, I stay away from anything with the SanDisk name on
> it...........I stick with Kingston...

Kingston is a great manufacturer, but is a bit pricey for comparable memory.
For memory cards you can't beat Lexar for great quality and reliability at a
bargain basement price.  I used to swear by Kingston years ago, but haven't
bought or used any of their memory for almost seven years due to high
pricing and low value.  For servers and high-end workstations we use
Samsung.

Rita
Wolfgang Schmittenhammer - 11 Jun 2006 13:58 GMT
You obviously have more experience than me, but I have found problems
can be expensive and EXTREMELY time consuming..I am a wannabe geek, so I
 probably cause most of my own problems..  I don't know how much
cheaper you can get a card, but check this out Kingston 2gb elite pro
$56.99 + $4.99 shipping..  I bought one a month ago and it was $70+ ,
prices are falling like a rock....
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820160033

>> Personally, I stay away from anything with the SanDisk name on
>> it...........I stick with Kingston...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Rita
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 11 Jun 2006 21:24 GMT
> You obviously have more experience than me, but I have found problems
> can be expensive and EXTREMELY time consuming..I am a wannabe geek,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> prices are falling like a rock....
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820160033

That sounds like a reasonable price for the 50X Kingston.  I paid $70+ each
(After $100 rebate) as well for the 80X 2GB Lexars a few months ago.  The
Kingston is a bit slower, but this really isn't a problem for most people
anyway.  Kingston is quality and they do offer a fantastic warranty and
customer service.  So, really, it's a tossup of which one to buy.

Rita
Arild P. - 11 Jun 2006 22:00 GMT
I had the exact same question a couple of weeks ago prior to buying a
Canon EOS-350D camera and choosing a suitable memory card for it. I
stumbled across this site with memory card speed-tests for many
cameras. I'm sure the D-70s is among them.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-7699

In any case I came to the understanding that the Sandisk Extreme III
didn't give much of a speed advantage over the Ultra II, so I saved a
little money by picking up an Ultra II.
Steve Wolfe - 12 Jun 2006 03:49 GMT
> Simple question:   I've got a D70s,  would I benefit from an extreme
> III CF as opposed to an extreme II card?

 Here are some real-world numbers for you, on the D70.  He doesn't quite
have the D70s tests done:

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-6816

 In any event, real-world, in-camera performance between an Ultra II and an
Extreme III is usually 10% or less, often less than 5%.  Performance in a
high-end card reader (like the Lexar firewire model) may be different.
Whether that's worth it to you is your decision.

steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.