SNIP
> Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
That's why its non IR images, 99.998%, rock.
Bart
P.S. the approx. 0.002% are aliasing and a bit of IR sensitivity
which, apparently, is effectively removed to avoid ruining 99.998% of
the images.
Well it very much depends on the type of IR you want to do. It is not a
good choice for people or things that move (then again basically none
of the recent dSLRs really are good for this, unmodified). For
landscape work, it works well provided you do not mind using a tripod.
And afterall, most people's photography could benefit from using a
tripod :)
Cheers,
Wayne
Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog and Podcast http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Personal art site http://www.artinyourface.com/
> > Hi All,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
Wolfgang Schmittenhammer - 11 Jun 2006 02:10 GMT
> Well it very much depends on the type of IR you want to do. It is not a
> good choice for people or things that move (then again basically none
> of the recent dSLRs really are good for this, unmodified). For
> landscape work, it works well provided you do not mind using a tripod.
> And afterall, most people's photography could benefit from using a
> tripod :)
One I did with a Nikon D70 and Kodak wratten 87c
http://www.geocities.com/tonguesten@sbcglobal.net/mun_falls_ir.jpg
> Cheers,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>>Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
wayne - 11 Jun 2006 02:55 GMT
The link doesn't seem to work.
Cheers,
Wayne
> > Well it very much depends on the type of IR you want to do. It is not a
> > good choice for people or things that move (then again basically none
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >>
> >>Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
Wolfgang Schmittenhammer - 11 Jun 2006 09:44 GMT
What browser are you using???
> The link doesn't seem to work.
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>>>
>>>>Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
wayne - 11 Jun 2006 10:50 GMT
Firefox and Safari. I get the Yahoo message Page not Found.
> What browser are you using???
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> >>>>
> >>>>Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
Wolfgang Schmittenhammer - 11 Jun 2006 13:18 GMT
I also use Firefox, try Explorer, seems to act weird in Firefox???
Also try this (smaller file)
http://www.geocities.com/tonguesten@sbcglobal.net/mun_falls_ir_sm.jpg
> Firefox and Safari. I get the Yahoo message Page not Found.
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?
wayne - 11 Jun 2006 15:10 GMT
Ok, got it. Nice image. Great location
Cheers,
Wayne
> I also use Firefox, try Explorer, seems to act weird in Firefox???
> Also try this (smaller file)
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Not exactly the best choice for IR, is it?