Hi there ...
My trusty old Sony Trinitron monitor is finally fading to the point I
am making wicked contrast and saturation errors when souping up D100
pics in Photoshop. Also the new workstation I have set up has BARELY
enough room for a tube monitor.
Question ...
I've been looking all over the place for a LCD monitor that might do
the job, but every last one of them seems to have angle contrast issues
that are practically unbearable - for instance the brightness of the
reds can be so different from one angle to the next that things appear
a little different from one EYE to the next and actually makes it look
like things are glowing.
Now - I took at look at the iMac's and the Apple "Cinema" LCD monitors
and they seem to be using some new technology that prevents (or at
least reduces) the difference in brightness from one angle to the next.
Question - does anyone make a 3:4, preferable 17" LCD monitor with
similar technology?
Thanks!
Ax
tomm42 - 07 Jun 2006 17:39 GMT
> Hi there ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Ax
Look into Lacie LCDs, I have an HP 1940 that is excellent for editing,
good brightness that is adjustable, good contrast, and for the images I
have had printed on a Chromira right on. This is a 19 inch which I
feel is about minimum for editing. You don't have to be right in front
of the monitor to see it either, as you do with my laptop. The Mac
Cinema displays are excellent too, but not the only ones.
Tom
Bart van der Wolf - 08 Jun 2006 00:14 GMT
SNIP
> Look into Lacie LCDs, I have an HP 1940 that is excellent for
> editing,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> of the monitor to see it either, as you do with my laptop. The Mac
> Cinema displays are excellent too, but not the only ones.
From (recent) experience I can second the LaCie suggestion. My
Trinitron CRT expired its useful life, so I took the plunge (the Eizo
one I was eyeballing was too expensive for me). I got the LaCie 321
(21 inch, 1600x1200 native resolution) and it is very insensitive to
viewing angle. The gamut is roughly as large as the Trinitron was,
although a bit better in Red/Yellow than Blue.
Be aware that LCDs are more difficult to profile than CRTs, if you
work in a color-managed environment. A good profiling solution will be
able to 'tame the beast'.
Bart
ink - 08 Jun 2006 10:25 GMT
> "tomm42" <tmonego@wildblue.net> wrote in message
> news:1149698378.780583.246190@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> The gamut is roughly as large as the Trinitron was, although a bit better
> in Red/Yellow than Blue.
Bart,
just out of curiosity - which Eizo were you looking at?
Cheers,
ink
Bart van der Wolf - 08 Jun 2006 10:48 GMT
SNIP
> just out of curiosity - which Eizo were you looking at?
From their ColorEdge CG Graphics series,
http://www.eizo.com/products/graphics/index.asp , in particular the
CG220 for its wide gamut, or as a compromise the CG210.
The investment at this time was too steep for me,
e.g. <http://www.colormall.com/Graphics-Monitors-C64.aspx>
in particular if you recognize that LCDs also deteriorate over time,
albeit at a slower pace than a CRT.
Bart
ink - 08 Jun 2006 12:04 GMT
"Bart van der Wolf" wrote...
> SNIP
>> just out of curiosity - which Eizo were you looking at?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> in particular if you recognize that LCDs also deteriorate over time,
> albeit at a slower pace than a CRT.
Thanks a lot for that... woohoo! I can understand what you mean by
"steep"... OTOH my wife-to-be asked me a couple of days ago what I wanted
for my upcoming birthday... <chuckle>
Cheers & thanks again!
ink
ian - 09 Jun 2006 01:09 GMT
> "Bart van der Wolf" wrote...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Cheers & thanks again!
> ink
Have a phillips 170B4 17" TFT monitor. has srgb setting, 9500K and 6500K
for colour management. Seems fine to me. Good viewing angle and a spyder 2
calibrates it nicely.
Steve - 10 Jun 2006 01:16 GMT
I remember reading somewhere about a kind of background displayed along
with a photo that would indicate when you were viewing an LCD monitor at the
optimum viewing angle. I think it was a checker board pattern that
disappeared when the angle was correct, or something like that. Anybody hear
about this kind of thing? or where can a person get it?
Steve
> Hi there ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Ax
Simon Stanmore - 11 Jun 2006 00:42 GMT
> Hi there ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Ax
From a doc. I'm writing...
It is highly recommended that your imaging workstation uses a CRT monitor
(conventional Cathode Ray Tube) rather than a consumer grade flat panel
display. In general LCD monitors have a poor rendition in the quarter tones
and a small viewing angle that can make accurate density and colour
adjustment difficult. Exceptions to the rule are high-end LCD monitors
designed specifically for the creative worker. Some of these use 10-bit
colour internally and are much better at displaying colour and a full tonal
range accurately. They include:
§ Eizo Coloredge CG19 / CG210 / CG220
§ Lacie 321
§ NEC Spectraview 1980 / 2180
A cheaper option is an Apple Cinema Display. Avoid batches with uneven
backlights.
--
Simon
http://www.simonstanmore.com
http://www.pbase.com/stanmore
bmoag - 12 Jun 2006 18:53 GMT
Most high quality LCDs can be adapted even for finicky color managed work
although it is not necessarily as straight forward as setting up even a
medium quality CRT with color management. You may have to make some test
prints to tweak monitor settings for contrast and saturation but the process
is not all that difficult.
I tell myself this but every time I use an LCD I am very glad that my now
very old NEC CRT is still reliable for image processing . . .