> I've got a D100 and have gotten a lot of use out of it. Some of the
> things I don't like are the slowness of getting the picture to the
> compact flash and it has a tendency to under expose. I'm considering
> replacing it with a D200. Would anyone care to comment? I'm not a pro
> but an avid amateur.
I just upgraded from a Fuji S2 (which I bought in preference to the
D100) to a D200, and am also an avid amateur, so perhaps my reasoning
and experience so far will be of some use to you.
The D200 has a bigger buffer (about 19 pictures; it depends a *little*
on format apparently) so you can take longer bursts before the card
limits the shooting speed, and it also writes to the card much faster
(I timed it at 7.6 MB/sec to a Lexar 133x card with WA; about 4.6 to
an 80x with WA). I don't know the numbers for the D100 off-hand, but
I don't think it was far different from my S2, and this is *much*
faster than my S2.
These cameras seem to have the exposure biased to avoid burning out
even trivial amounts of highlights; yes, they tend to underexpose.
Can't compare to the D100 directly -- but there appears to be a custom
function setting that does permanent exposure bias in various modes.
If I'm understand that right (haven't used it yet) you can use that to
fine-tune the exposure to match your preferences.

Signature
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>