Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

D100 vs. D200

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AlJ - 05 Apr 2006 21:31 GMT
Hi

I've got a D100 and have gotten a lot of use out of it.  Some of the
things I don't like are the slowness of getting the picture to the
compact flash and it has a tendency to under expose.  I'm considering
replacing it with a D200.  Would anyone care to comment?  I'm not a pro
but an avid amateur.

We have a two week trip through Yellowstone and Glacier National Parks
in July.  If I get the D200, I might actually take both.  

Thanks
David Dyer-Bennet - 05 Apr 2006 22:06 GMT
> I've got a D100 and have gotten a lot of use out of it.  Some of the
> things I don't like are the slowness of getting the picture to the
> compact flash and it has a tendency to under expose.  I'm considering
> replacing it with a D200.  Would anyone care to comment?  I'm not a pro
> but an avid amateur.

I just upgraded from a Fuji S2 (which I bought in preference to the
D100) to a D200, and am also an avid amateur, so perhaps my reasoning
and experience so far will be of some use to you.

The D200 has a bigger buffer (about 19 pictures; it depends a *little*
on format apparently) so you can take longer bursts before the card
limits the shooting speed, and it also writes to the card much faster
(I timed it at 7.6 MB/sec to a Lexar 133x card with WA; about 4.6 to
an 80x with WA).   I don't know the numbers for the D100 off-hand, but
I don't think it was far different from my S2, and this is *much*
faster than my S2.  

These cameras seem to have the exposure biased to avoid burning out
even trivial amounts of highlights; yes, they tend to underexpose.
Can't compare to the D100 directly -- but there appears to be a custom
function setting that does permanent exposure bias in various modes.
If I'm understand that right (haven't used it yet) you can use that to
fine-tune the exposure to match your preferences.
Signature

David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.