> I have just posted an article on previsualization on my web at:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> like to see more of this type of article or if you prefer the technical
> articles. Send me an email and let me know.
Great image, nice article. But don't you narrow down previsualization a
bit too much in the last paragraph when you contrast it to autofocus
and autoexposure?
When I do candid portraits, I always know exactly what facial
expression I want to catch - somehing that I have decided is
characteristic for this person for this or the other reason. But just
because it is characteristic it doesn't have to occur very often - just
more often than in other people. And it is sometimes a very fleeting
moment in time - a particular type of quick smile, that has to be
captured in exactly the right fifth of a second, in a worst-case
scenario.
For these kinds of previsualizations, I feel that autofocus and
autoexposure are not something that detracts from, or diminishes
previsualization, but a necessary condition for the previsualized image
ever to be captured.
I know, as exactly as you, what I want to capture. I want to capture a
particular facial expression of a person whose moving aboutI can't, and
don't want to, direct.
And at least on my technical level, in the general case this simply
isn't possible without autofocus and autoexposure.
Jan Böhme
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) - 29 Mar 2006 15:09 GMT
>>I have just posted an article on previsualization on my web at:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> bit too much in the last paragraph when you contrast it to autofocus
> and autoexposure?
I agree. I also do not like the "pre" part of visualization.
It should be visualization, and composition.
I do both large format landscape and wildlife action photography.
Both require visualization and good composition. I can spend
45 minutes setting up to get a landscape image, and then wait
hours for the light, e.g.:
http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries/gallery.landscape-1/web/c072099_L4_01a2-600
b.html
Wildlife action photography requires the same things, While you must
arrive on site ready for the best light, you can't compose until the
moment happens. When it does, you may have only a fraction of a second
to move a big telephoto lens toward the subject, compose and shoot.
e.g.:
http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries/gallery.bird/web/c01.14.2003.img_5113.egret
-flight.f-600.html
http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries/gallery.bird/web/great.blue.herons.the.kiss
.JZ3F8149.f-700.html
Visualization is a skill that is required in all photography, and is
independent of autofocus, autoexposure and frames per second.
or frames per day. I have taken no pictures on an outing,
a handful other times, to more than 5000 per day on a wildlife
trek. All require the same visualization (including knowing there
are no pictures you want so not wasting your time).
Roger
ron - 29 Mar 2006 15:34 GMT
Jan,
Good point. I agree completely. In the next day or two, I will reword
that bit about the autofocus and auto exposure.
C J Southern - 29 Mar 2006 23:34 GMT
> Jan,
>
> Good point. I agree completely. In the next day or two, I will reword
> that bit about the autofocus and auto exposure.
And make it available in PDF?
(Web sites may come and go, but PDF is for keeps :)
Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 30 Mar 2006 01:09 GMT
>> Jan,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>(Web sites may come and go, but PDF is for keeps :)
People keep saying. What's the big deal? Get yourselves one of the any
number of free utils available that allow you to print to pdf and just
print the web page.
--
Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://EdwardGRuf.com