Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

advice

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mike walsh - 29 Mar 2006 01:36 GMT
Hi,

I own several point/shoot dsc's along with an old Canon AE1 film SLR that
still takes great pictures. I'm now in the market for a DSLR for
"recreational use" - vacations, kids' sporting events etc. I don't have any
AF lenses, so am not predisposed to any brand - though several frineds have
recommended Nikon over Canon for various reasons. Right now I'm leaning
towards the D50 as it seems to have the right price and features. I've also
been looking at the Sigma 18-200 lens as it seems like a good option for a
wide variety of shots.

Any thoughts/opinions would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
C J Southern - 29 Mar 2006 03:02 GMT
"mike walsh" <walshsw@comcast.net> wrote in message

> I own several point/shoot dsc's along with an old Canon AE1 film SLR that
> still takes great pictures. I'm now in the market for a DSLR for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> been looking at the Sigma 18-200 lens as it seems like a good option for a
> wide variety of shots.

Why would you buy a new Ferrari, and then attach square pram wheels to it?
Pete D - 29 Mar 2006 12:02 GMT
>> recommended Nikon over Canon for various reasons. Right now I'm leaning
>> towards the D50 as it seems to have the right price and features. I've
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Why would you buy a new Ferrari, and then attach square pram wheels to it?

D50 is hardly a Ferrari. Reasonably appropriate lens for the camera but I
believe the 18-125mm Sigma is a little better.
C J Southern - 29 Mar 2006 23:19 GMT
> D50 is hardly a Ferrari. Reasonably appropriate lens for the camera but I
> believe the 18-125mm Sigma is a little better.

I was being polite :)
Bill - 29 Mar 2006 04:58 GMT
>I own several point/shoot dsc's along with an old Canon AE1 film SLR that
>still takes great pictures. I'm now in the market for a DSLR for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>been looking at the Sigma 18-200 lens as it seems like a good option for a
>wide variety of shots.

Right now I think the Nikon D50 is the best entry level DSLR.

It performs well and it can use a wide variety of lenses. If you don't
have a need to stick with Canon due to lenses, then I highly recommend
the Nikon D50.

However, the kit lense is not very good. I recommend you find a place
that will sell you a "kit" with the D50 body and the Nikon 18-70mm lense
that's usually included in the D70 kit. The lense is very good and
covers the equivalent of a 28-105mm on a film body. Price will be higher
than the Sigma, but you get what you pay for. You can read about the
Nikon 18-70mm here:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1870.htm

The Sigma 18-200mm is a dog of a lense. It's only value is the wide zoom
range and small size. Image quality is mediocre at best. I suggest you
avoid it.

If you feel you have to have a single lense, see if you can get your
hands on the Nikon 18-200mm. It's a surprisingly good lense. You can
read about that one here too:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18200.htm

By the way, I use Canon gear and I try to remain unbiased when it comes
to this stuff. My investment in Canon lenses is the reason I use Canon
cameras.
ian lincoln - 29 Mar 2006 15:52 GMT
> Hi,
>
> I own several point/shoot dsc's along with an old Canon AE1 film SLR
Right now I'm leaning
> towards the D50 as it seems to have the right price and features.

traitor ;)
Charles Schuler - 29 Mar 2006 23:09 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Any thoughts/opinions would be appreciated.

Canon 350D with an efs 17-85 lens.

Just my opinion ... the Nikons are also very good cameras.
AaronW - 09 Apr 2006 17:07 GMT
> I own several point/shoot dsc's along with an old Canon AE1 film SLR that
> still takes great pictures. I'm now in the market for a DSLR for
> "recreational use" - vacations,

Canon 28/2.8
Olympus 0.7x

> kids'

Canon 50/1.8

> sporting events etc.

Canon 70-300/4-5.6 IS

> I don't have any
> AF lenses, so am not predisposed to any brand - though several frineds have
> recommended Nikon over Canon for various reasons. Right now I'm leaning
> towards the D50 as it seems to have the right price and features.

Canon 350D: 8MP
Nikon D50: 1/500s X Sync
Minolta 5D: Anti-Shake
Pentax DS: TTL Flash

http://digitcamera.tripod.com/#slr
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.