Hello.
I´m looking for a w-a lens for my camera.
It must be of comparable optical quality to
Nikons 50mm 1,8 and about 14-18mm.
Any suggestions
TIA
Regards, Ole Larsen.
New Images And Design Febr. 2006
http://home.tiscali.dk/muggler
http://www.supportdenmark.com
>Hello.
>
>I´m looking for a w-a lens for my camera.
>It must be of comparable optical quality to
>Nikons 50mm 1,8 and about 14-18mm.
>Any suggestions
My suggestion is that your should scrap your requirement that a lens
in the 14mm to 18mm range of focal lengths "must be of comparable
optical quality to Nikons 50mm 1,8". Why? Because that requirement
simply cannot be fulfilled by any lens in that focal length range.
The 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor AIS, AF, AF-N and AF-D lenses (all of which are
optically almost identical) offer outstanding resolution and contrast,
extremely low distortion and excellent colour rendition. The only
possible criticism of these lenses is that the bokeh is harsh. In the
14mm to 18mm range you are going to have to accept optical compromises
that are not forced on designers of 50mm lenses, and no lens in that
range of focal lengths will perform remotely as well.
You might like to consider the 14mm f/2.8D AF Nikkor:
http://www.nikonimaging.com/global/products/lens/af/wideangle/af_14mmf_28d/index.htm
or the 18mm f/2.8D AF Nikkor:
http://www.nikonimaging.com/global/products/lens/af/wideangle/af_18mmf_28d/index.htm
Of these two, the 18mm is optically superior, but that isn't much help
if you really need the 14mm focal length - there is a *huge*
difference in the field of view between these focal lengths.
Of the independent manufacturers, Sigma and Tamron make 14mm f/2.8
lenses. These two have performances that compare reasonably well with
the Nikon 14mm f/2.8 but both are cheaper. The Sigma is considerably
cheaper and probably offers the best value, subject to the usual Sigma
concerns about build quality and compatibility with future DSLRs.
In manual focus lenses, Tamron and Tokina make good 17mm lenses, but
they won't offer metering with your D70. Neither will the 15mm and
18mm f/3.5 AIS Nikkors.
Finally, why not consider a zoom lens? The Sigma 12-24mm and 15-30mm
both cover 35mm full frame and are optically surprisingly good.
The 12-24mm f/4 G AF-S DX Nikkor and the Tokina 12-24mm f/4 AT-X Pro
DX both cover only the APS-C sized digital sensor but the Tokina costs
less than half the price of the Nikkor. There is also a Sigma
10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC for the smaller sensor.
Given that the performance of the Nikon, Tamron and Sigma 14mm f/2.8
fixed focal length lenses is not stellar, these zoom lenses are well
worth considering. A Google search will reveal a wealth of reviews
and test data of variable quality.
For the best overall optical performance, the 18mm f/2.8D AF Nikkor is
probably the best of the lenses I have mentioned. Good luck with your
research and I hope you enjoy choosing!
Ole Larsen - 27 Mar 2006 14:56 GMT
Tony Polson skrev:
>> Hello.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> optical quality to Nikons 50mm 1,8". Why? Because that requirement
> simply cannot be fulfilled by any lens in that focal length range.
Thanks for your information. I guess I´ll have to do my own testing of
a 10/12-20/24 mm since results of the tests I have seen are so diverging

Signature
Med venlig hilsen, Ole Larsen.
New Images And Design Febr. 2006
http://home.tiscali.dk/muggler
http://www.supportdenmark.com
Paul Furman - 27 Mar 2006 17:07 GMT
> Tony Polson skrev:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks for your information. I guess I´ll have to do my own testing of
> a 10/12-20/24 mm since results of the tests I have seen are so diverging
If it's a fast lens you need, 28 or 35mm are the limit for f/2-f/1.4 range.
Ole Larsen - 27 Mar 2006 20:39 GMT
Paul Furman skrev:
>> Thanks for your information. I guess I´ll have to do my own testing of
>> a 10/12-20/24 mm since results of the tests I have seen are so diverging
>
> If it's a fast lens you need, 28 or 35mm are the limit for f/2-f/1.4 range.
No, I do not need a fast w-a, just a w-a ;-)

Signature
Med venlig hilsen, Ole Larsen.
New Images And Design Febr. 2006
http://home.tiscali.dk/muggler
http://www.supportdenmark.com
Paul Furman - 27 Mar 2006 21:27 GMT
> Paul Furman skrev:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> No, I do not need a fast w-a, just a w-a ;-)
OK then one of those zooms should work. If you are doing architectural
work, distortion would be an important consideration. Flare is another
important variable with those.
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 27 Mar 2006 22:50 GMT
> OK then one of those zooms should work. If you are doing architectural
> work, distortion would be an important consideration. Flare is another
> important variable with those.
And using the D70, distortion is not as big of a deal if you are willing to do
postprocessing. Photoshop has great tools for attempting to fix distortion.
I say attempt, because nothing is perfect, but it seems Photoshop can do
better than any wide angle lens.

Signature
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
David Dyer-Bennet - 27 Mar 2006 22:04 GMT
> If it's a fast lens you need, 28 or 35mm are the limit for f/2-f/1.4 range.
So you're saying my Nikkor 24mm f2 doesn't exist? (Or are you talking
about what's *currently made* rather than whats *possible*?)

Signature
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>