Is fredmiranda canon centric?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

l e o - 23 Mar 2006 23:39 GMT

I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there are
85 reviews for Canon's but only 22 reviews for Nikon's. Where do
Nikonians get their info?

Reply to this Message

Måns Rullgård - 23 Mar 2006 23:49 GMT

> I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
> Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there
> are 85 reviews for Canon's but only 22 reviews for Nikon's. Where do
> Nikonians get their info?

Have you tried nikonians.org?

Signature

Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com

Reply to this Message

Colin D - 24 Mar 2006 03:02 GMT

> I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
> Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there are
> 85 reviews for Canon's but only 22 reviews for Nikon's. Where do
> Nikonians get their info?

I should say that about reflects the relative popularity ...{:-)

Colin D.

Reply to this Message

cjcampbell - 24 Mar 2006 09:21 GMT

All us Nikonians are out shooting pictures instead of hanging around
the review boards bragging about our gear.

Reply to this Message

C J Southern - 25 Mar 2006 06:34 GMT

> > I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
> > Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> All us Nikonians are out shooting pictures instead of hanging around
> the review boards bragging about our gear.

It's absolutely true - Nikonians have nothing to brag about. Sad, but true.

Reply to this Message

Petri Lopia - 25 Mar 2006 08:22 GMT

>> > I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
>> > Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there are
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It's absolutely true - Nikonians have nothing to brag about. Sad, but true.
>:)

So I guess that you both are using Canon cos you are braging here? ;-)

Signature

Petri Lopia :: petri.REMOVElopia@iki.fi.invalid
Firework, Lightning, sun, moon, nature etc. photos
http://www.petrilopia.net/

Reply to this Message

C J Southern - 26 Mar 2006 02:58 GMT

> >> > I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
> >> > Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there are
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> So I guess that you both are using Canon cos you are braging here? ;-)

You guessed right in my case - Christopher on the other hand has aligned
himself with "the dark side" however. Also sad, but true. Then again, being
a flight instructor he probably can't afford anything better :P (uh-oh -
even lower than before!!!).

Reply to this Message

Paul J Gans - 26 Mar 2006 04:13 GMT

>I am looking at the review of wide angle lenses for Canon 10-22 and
>Nikon 12-24. Nikon's lens is 15 months older than Canon's but there are
>85 reviews for Canon's but only 22 reviews for Nikon's. Where do
>Nikonians get their info?

Perhaps that's the problem. More should write reviews?

----- Paul J. Gans

Reply to this Message